These "users" want to prove that WE downvote brigade?

Check this out. Why only kevdude, I wonder?

@Trigglypuff @kevdude @ExpertShitposter @Rotteuxx @Disappointed <--- pinged because interest, also, nobody but ((())) hates @Trigglypuff this much.

Long-time usernames that people recognize:

1. @9-11 - Accuses @kevdude of attacking Voat

2. @freshmeat - Thinks mods of SYSTEM subverses, quote:

I think subs have the right to get rid of troublesome users. I'd say Expert is more obnoxious than Sane was so it makes sense for subs who want to keep a standard of quality to ban Xir/Xer.

And claims to know how obnoxious Sane was despite existing for 5 months. Also using "Xir/Xer" as if he's being held to a Reddit standard of addressing people.

Also, admits to being MightyYetGentle who absolutely has used sock puppet accounts to spam shit.

Did I mentione he's also AMALEK?

3. @Grifter42 - Accuses Kevdude of banning him and when called on it, accuses kevdude of being another user.

4. @Womb-Raider - Accuses Kevdude of being SBBH and "destroy[ing] so many [subs]". No links to any subs that were destroyed, or mentioning of their names. Not that any real link to SBBH has been made.

5. @weezkitty claims SYSTEM subs aren't subject to VOAT rules only, but claims that MODS can direct the conversation how they see fit.

6. @SarMegahhikkitha - Accuses PV and SBBH of downvote brigades DESPITE PUTT BANNING THE USERS THAT DID SUCH THINGS and PV being completely untouched by that banwave.

7. @Dr_No - Accuses everyone involved of being SBBH then accuses @KatHarzso of being an @kevdude alt. No proof found.

Obvious sockpuppet low-time/low-contribution accounts:

1. @The_Grassy_Knoll - Asserts that Kevdude is SBBH despite the username existing for just over 1 day.

2. @youdumbcuckface - Calls kevdude a lying sack of shit despite existing for 13 days

3. @saltpricesplummet - "My sympathy is wearing thin for those getting booted from subs and then bitching about it. It's the "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you" mentality." Supports booting people from SYSTEM SUBVERSES despite existing for 1 month.

4. @Caesium-137 - "I dont see the issue, seems to me he was abusing the subverse. And as moderator @kadynce took action to make the verse better to the people who use it." User for EIGHT DAYS.

5. @Walkingman - Spouts about the same rhetoric as the two usernames above and has existed for one month with a massive 21ccp.

6. @Thrus2 - Thinks he knows how SYSTEM subs should operate despite barely contributing 10ccp/day he's existed, and ZERO SCP for 4 months.

7. @fagetty - Tells @kevdude to go back to SRS user for 22 days.

Almost as many easy-to-spot sock-puppet accounts to manufacture consent as there are usernames that people recognize.