Seemingly my comment in v/PeotectVoat was regarded as breaking a rule in his subverses:
v/therealenvironment
v/freepoliticaldisc
Link to Comment:
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3059449/17005719
@bfwilley I publicly and humbly apologize for suggesting that by using a Facebook referral link that you look on while unsuspecting Voaters pleasure themselves.
Please enlighten me (and other potential violators) as to how we may correct this clearly egregious error so that all may be free to civilly discuss politics and free to civilly discover the real environment.
Thank you in advance.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this v/whatever comment by @shadow332.
Posted automatically (#27990) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
shadow332 ago
I got banned for posting in your thread as well.. @heygeorge, @MadWorld, read @kobold's completely unsuspicious and benign response to me simply mentioning his post history. Wouldn't you totally respond like that if you were up to nothing? Haha seems he learned from the same school as @bfwilley.
kobold ago
fuck you shill
kneo24 ago
Why is your lot interested in making "no u" statements and completely diverting away from the issue at hand?
kobold ago
my only issue is that asshole332 came into my thread and started insulting me and all the other people there. that and wasting my time with your 'concerns'. ysk i am not here to push your agendas , ideas or whatever you are after.
kneo24 ago
If you felt it was a waste of time, you wouldn't have responded at all, unless you're some complete retard who doesn't understand the value of their own time.
sguevar ago
Serious questions:
Why do you prefer to give the direct link to the site you are sharing instead of archiving the link?
Why is it a problem to even considering archiving the site?
Why do you result in a continuous insults to address the questions being asked?
kobold ago
who are you?
why do you care?
what gives you the idea that i own you any answers?
looking forward to hear from you, best regards
sguevar ago
So your reply to my questions were a diversion.
I am sguevar, I think you can look at my posting history if you want to know more about me.
I am trying to understand why you are so unwilling to archive the links you share on here as it seems you take personally that you are being called out for posting those links in the first place.
I am actually trying to see if one can argue any reasonable doubt on your intentions and help with the accusation that other users are doing of you.
I am still waiting for your answers but doubt you will give them since you showed to be dismissive already, oh well...
kobold ago
why do you care about me being accused?
and again, why do you care about archiving and why should i care about it?
sguevar ago
I care about defending users (any for that matter) if there is reasonable doubt to defend them.
Because of data mining.
As you know Voat or sites like it premise anonymity as one way to defend Freedom of Speech and as you can understand because you are here, the majority of views that users express here are frowned upon in the outside world.
Sites like the ones that you share, promote the data mining of such users that would like otherwise to remain anonymous to the world so they don't feel persecuted for expressing their views that are considered politically incorrect and within the legal boundaries of the law. Of course in this site you will see the same type of behavior by certain groups but you will still be able to post and express yourself. Even when some argue that is a lie, they are still posting here and expressing their discomfort about the site with no major repercussions.
I am actually amazed that you do not care about it because of the fact that those sites could mine your clicks, and so on and so forth. And even if it seems like a small detail, through that mining they are able to promote adds for certain things and also track the activity of said users. How do you think that FB is able to do studies of the manipulation of their members emotional status so effectively, for example?
I find the concerns of @shadow332 and @kneo24 reasonable and justifiable. I find your lack of interest concerning however I want to see if there is a possibility to argue reasonable doubt on your favour and hence reason with you to let you understand why we have such a problem with this.
On my personal level, I really don't care if I ever get doxxed. But I do defend the right to privacy of the rest of the community if they so want to defend it. As well as I would defend any user if he/she is falsely accused or accused of an intention they might not have had.
Still waiting on your replies, so far you have been diverting and this to my eye, even if you don't care about it, doesn't look good and may be used against you as a proof of their accusations towards you.
kobold ago
sorry, too much kafka for me, this conversation is over. in your place i would worry about yourselves, look in the mirror sometimes, and mind your own business before interfereing with others.
your buddy shadow is an asshole, he gets nothing but abuse from me for how he behaved in my thread:
https://voat.co/v/politics/3057904/16991176 <-unprovoked insult
https://voat.co/v/politics/3057904/16991508
https://voat.co/v/politics/3057904/17005678 <- a lie
https://voat.co/v/politics/3057904/16993355 <- unprovoked insult
sguevar ago
If your actions endanger the community don't expect us to.
His approach can be different than mine but you are no better when addressing counter arguments, not only you show dismissals and diversions as your defence but you also use more insults than they do. I mean I even read their replies.
Thanks for proving them right.
kobold ago
i have an idea: get on tor you guys, if its good enough for drug dealers it will be good enough for you too. hopefully, it will make you less paranoid
sguevar ago
Research about data mining son š
shadow332 ago
@sguevar, I hope @kobold has now convinced you of his non-site-shilling innocence, by:
never addressing why he doesn't archive
using baseless namecalling
calling you paranoid
talking about some random youtube videos you posted which have nothing to with shilling for greenmedinfo
telling you it's too kafkaesque when you calmly and clearly laid out all of your arguments.
Although I'm going to be honest here, after grilling him a bit and reading all of his replies to everyone, he just seems like a complete loser and not someone actually pushing a specific site. The other (bigger and more post prolific) accounts just ignore us when we point this out; this guy just comes off as massive retard. What got me is the complete misuse of Kafka. :-)
kobold ago
fuck off asshole322
shadow332 ago
Lol, hope you're not spamming some site with your alts. I'll be watching you now, you little genius. XD
kobold ago
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/urgent-mandatory-hpv-jabs-school-kids-fl-100-vaccine-bills-flood-30-states
click it, monkey!
kobold ago
i care a lot /s
idiot.
sguevar ago
LMAO... Yes in all of his answers and evansions he did proved to be exactly what you claim here.
Sadly, I extended my help but was rejected due to lack of objectivity. Either way thanks for the work you guys put on here.
shadow332 ago
No problem, I loved reading your exchange btw. You phrased everything so well and he just stumbled and faltered over himself. Great stuff!
sguevar ago
Well I think that while others have a more direct and bold approach, I could have a more subtle yet not cucked one.
Some like it some don't, such is life (shrug) XD
kobold ago
you are posting youtube links in your costa rica sub, dad
sguevar ago
True, I still have to learn to upload on invidio
kobold ago
and nyt and bbc...
sguevar ago
I believe I have apologized on each of those postings and it is not a frequent activity I do like yourself.
You have try harder if you want to show anything here. Have anything else?
kobold ago
peace
sguevar ago
Have a good one son.
Chempergrill ago
I posted. I got banned :)
heygeorge ago
I presume you were not civil? Iām really hoping that u/bfwilley will elucidate me on how he views civility.
Chempergrill ago
Of course I wasn't :)
MadWorld ago
Was just about to make a submission here. The snake shows its tail... I cannot remember if I have ever crossed his subverses or interacted under his subverses. And I got a banned too XD.
This:
and this:
It probably has more to do with @shadow332's report or another one of those submissions that called him out.
sguevar ago
To me I am amazed that you got banned for Rule #1 because you are one of the most civil people I have met here. Just because of that I do distrust the Mod, but I do clarify that his rules are clear. Nothing more to it.
I am not interested in his subverses at all.
heygeorge ago
@bfwilley see above. @MadWorld is a civil and kind person