Your weak ass reply and playing the "troll" card, only show your character when confronted by your own actions. I just hope the admins will see this to. I am very serious about these issues, hence I pinged both of them. You would have issues with this to, if this was done on any other major sub besides /v/protectvoat .
In any case I had my say, gave you a fair chance to explain yourself and gave you a chance to speak out against brigades directed from your sub. You did none of that, so in my eyes you are nothing but a hypocrite bully who is condoning and stimulating SRS like practises on voat. Honestly instead of protecting voat, you went through the looking glass and came out as the SRS on voat. (this is exactly what I warned you about over a year ago)
I made my point and will await a response from the admins when they have the time.
/u/Cuckbot made a comment directly after this sticky was posted, with a link to this live thread: https://voat.co/v/news/1379577/6726153 . As anyone can clearly see this is a call for a brigade. There was minimal follow through, but i believe that has more to do with my swift reply pointing out that this was a brigading call, then with the intention of the poster.
/u/kevdude apperantly condones and stimulates organized brigades on Voat contributors. As you can read up in this thread; see him dodge the question "Do you condone @cuckbot's comment/behavior" multiple times, instead he actually tries to justify this kind of behaviour.
/u/Kevdude posted and stickied a direct live link in /v/protectvoat : https://voat.co/v/news/1388508 . As you can clearly see kevdude got heavily upvoted and anyone else got heavily downvoted. As this post barely got any visibility on /v/news due to downvotes, traffic had to have come from this sticky on /v/protectvoat. This makes it an organized brigade.
I would also like to point out that this is the general tone in which /u/kevdude communicates with fellow voat moderators, spouts unfounded assumptions at them and a prime example of the state of his paranoia.
view the rest of the comments →
Boukert ago
Your weak ass reply and playing the "troll" card, only show your character when confronted by your own actions. I just hope the admins will see this to. I am very serious about these issues, hence I pinged both of them. You would have issues with this to, if this was done on any other major sub besides /v/protectvoat .
In any case I had my say, gave you a fair chance to explain yourself and gave you a chance to speak out against brigades directed from your sub. You did none of that, so in my eyes you are nothing but a hypocrite bully who is condoning and stimulating SRS like practises on voat. Honestly instead of protecting voat, you went through the looking glass and came out as the SRS on voat. (this is exactly what I warned you about over a year ago)
I made my point and will await a response from the admins when they have the time.
Summary for /u/puttitout :
/u/Cuckbot made a comment directly after this sticky was posted, with a link to this live thread: https://voat.co/v/news/1379577/6726153 . As anyone can clearly see this is a call for a brigade. There was minimal follow through, but i believe that has more to do with my swift reply pointing out that this was a brigading call, then with the intention of the poster.
/u/kevdude apperantly condones and stimulates organized brigades on Voat contributors. As you can read up in this thread; see him dodge the question "Do you condone @cuckbot's comment/behavior" multiple times, instead he actually tries to justify this kind of behaviour.
/u/Kevdude posted and stickied a direct live link in /v/protectvoat : https://voat.co/v/news/1388508 . As you can clearly see kevdude got heavily upvoted and anyone else got heavily downvoted. As this post barely got any visibility on /v/news due to downvotes, traffic had to have come from this sticky on /v/protectvoat. This makes it an organized brigade.
I would also like to point out that this is the general tone in which /u/kevdude communicates with fellow voat moderators, spouts unfounded assumptions at them and a prime example of the state of his paranoia.