https://files.catbox.moe/xgmuhz.png
https://files.catbox.moe/5z8yla.png
https://files.catbox.moe/7w4j2p.png
https://files.catbox.moe/lpykli.png
Does anyone think the above legit?
This is just one of many examples of what appears to be going on here. A counter-narrative psyop is being pushed, and if you're falling for it, kindly take your frustrations to another Q sub.
If you don't see what's going on behind the scenes. If you don't see their system being dismantled. If you don't see that what is going on is one of the LEAST awful things that could happen to destroy their thousands of years old webs throughout the world, that's fine.
Take your whining elsewhere.
https://files.catbox.moe/96uk4a.png
Take your shilling elsewhere. Stop inviting the above into GA.
@bopper @MolochHunter
Edit:
The above screenshots were taken from this now-deleted submission of a very frustrated Q follower.
I don't think @Johnny_Ninja is a shill. But if you're interested in why I've decided to remove the submission and ban many of the usernames commenting under it, find the ones pushing anti-Q, then click on their usernames. Submissions? Comments? Account age? Contribution points?
That's what was invited with that submission. It's okay to lose hope or get battle fatigue. It's okay to be disenfranchised by the predictions of the Q FOLLOWERS (not Q) known as "date-fagging".
If and when that happens to you, kindly take it elsewhere. Otherwise, you'll have posts celebrating your submission by people proven to defend and support pedophiles.
view the rest of the comments →
UltronWasRight ago
Wow. I'm at a loss for words. As an outsider and a lurker, this has made it very clear to me I would never be welcome here if I felt strongly pro-Q or pro-Trump, because the first time I said something you disagreed with I would be shut down and removed from the dialogue. I've lurked GA, tga, and QRV since I've created my account. This entire situation has very bad optics all-around, and your responses make you appear very high-strung. Take a breath, it will be OK.
MolochHunter ago
hey, congratulations on making your second only ever comment
Voatering4life ago
Who the fuck cares? He isn’t tearing anyone down. These are legitimate thoughts that many people share...he isn’t shilling and if he was, brigade him (or ignore or slide whichever). Voat really is starting to circle the drain as an OP before me has stated...pull it together folks.
MolochHunter ago
ur relatively new around here aintcha?
Voatering4life ago
I have read for long enough to know sometimes I am watching a passing match that does not accomplish the goal of free speech.
MolochHunter ago
what ive learnt in my time here dealing with co-ordinated attacks by professional shills & sleeper accounts that'speing to life' to defend some clear and present assholery is that Freedom of Speech is one Contitutional Right that can be misused to deny people another Constitutional Right - Right to Peaceable Assembly
and that therefore it is something you cant pursue as an Absolute; its something that much be held in Balance against other Rights
Voatering4life ago
So are you saying that the thread was an unpeaceable assembly? And that peaceable is a higher standard than ‘free’? If your answer is yes, I did not see unpeaceable but I also did not get all the way through the comments...
This is a serious question as I am starting to understand your position.
MolochHunter ago
was that thread in and of itself a breach of peaceable assembly? No. But the intention and the aggregate effect of this shill operation is
its like when women want to hold a meeting in a public library about the loss of their bathrooms and sports to transgender freaks, and the transactivists bash on the windows and yell abuse at any of the women entering or leaving the meeting
Voat has free speech. You can go make a Q sub yourself that tolerates any level of anti-Qery
we started out that way. We decided after a moderator got doxxed with death threats and rape threats against her children, and gay porn spam and a whole bunch of other shit, that we reserve the right to kick people acting disruptively out
Voatering4life ago
Given- I didn’t get to all the post/responses but I did not see the level of shillery you mention. Maybe the original 2 rich OP’s were fake but I did not see anything close to disruptive.
Crensch ago
That's because you haven't been swimming in what they're capable of for the past two years.
Nearly every username that agreed with the op and bashed Q was not a Great Awakening user or a q follower at any point. They were account specifically designed to be activated to cast shade whenever the opportunity presents itself.
Voatering4life ago
Well...we can have opposing views. Manufactured consensus is The Repbublics’ MO (not talking bout the 2 political groups here) it is a fact of life. I will continue to rise above it with my 10,000 foot view.