JEWISH CENSORSHIP: BYPASSED

Fucking unacceptable bullshit sockpuppets.

It was pretty easy to jump on the band wagon and become a holocaust denier

Yeah, facts will do that to you.

But something never sat right with me

About the holocaust.

something along the lines of if it was so obvious why are deniers a minority.

Not an argument. Appeal to authority. Appeal to majority. Appeal to popularity. Do you know anything about continental drift?

So I did a bunch of research independent of any forums

Such as purchasing a 1947 Encyclopedia Britannica to see that it makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of any holocaust, any genocide, and only says “thousands died in Nazi work camps”?

Oh, no, you didn’t do that.

I really did have to agree that:

Truth is not a matter of agreement. No one cares what you agreed with.

1. Deniers cherrypick.

Doesn’t happen. Fuck off.

I was overwhelmed by the sheer volume of war related documentation there is

So overwhelmed, in fact, that you likely didn’t read any of it. You didn’t read the Bletchley Park Decryptions* which show that there was no genocide planned, ordered, or carried out by any Germans anywhere, much less in the camps, and also shows that only 60,000 died at Auschwitz of typhus and malnutrition. You also didn’t read the post-Cold War German documents captured by the Soviets that were released, which show the same.

deniers only ever seem to use the few bits that suit their purpose

No, you’re thinking of jews. Such as when the Shoah Foundation only publicized the interviews that said it happened, and hid all the ones where the jews talk about “wow the beer we could buy was so watery” and “oy vey I had to draw the musical notation lines onto the paper they gave me because they didn’t have special musical paper already made!”

1. Overwhelming evidence about the gas chambers NOT being gas chambers turned out to not be so overwhelming afterall.

Except, you know, for the forensic evidence that proves they didn’t exist. And the physical impossibility of moving the gas in that fashion. And the physical impossibility of venting the room. And the physical impossibility of burning the bodies before they rotted. And the physical impossibility of burning that many bodies in the timeframe allotted. And the physical impossibility of burning ANY bodies WITHOUT FUEL, THAT ALLIED SPY RAIDS SHOW NEVER EXISTED.

Again deniers seem to only use evidence or methodology that suited their objectives.

Isn’t it funny how you refuse to substantiate any of your claims here?

So either the Jewish conspiracy is so huge and well funded that they are able to perpetuate a hoax of a scale grander than I can even imagine.

YES. THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING. You are saying “HURR DURR I TOO SMART TO BE FOOLED (because i say so) THEREFORE IT NO HAPPEN HURRRRRRRR” and thinking yourself a literal fucking god. You’re a solipsist of the highest degree. “I am the smartest being in the universe and anything which contradicts my experiences is not real. I cannot possibly imagine anything other than this, therefore nothing other than this could ever be real.” Divorce yourself of this thinking before the race war starts or you won’t last a week.

Or there actually is a lot of truth there.

There is no truth to any aspect of the holocaust narrative. “The camps existed and jews were put there” isn’t part of the narrative, because that has nothing to do with “a holocaust.” You know that words have definitions, right? “Holocaust” is a biblical term. Specifically, a Torahic one. Noah offered a holocaust unto the Lord when he got off the boat. Says it right in the Bible. Now what the fuck do you think THAT means, kiddo? Noah killed 6 million of his fellow kikes right then and there? But I thought that there weren’t too many left? Hmm… Maybe it means “A SACRIFICE BY FIRE”, as the jews did with animals millennia ago, and with Christian children today.

So “the holocaust” narrative means “being put into ovens and burned.” But we know that didn’t happen. So the holocaust didn’t happen.

Post something of substance if you’re not a coward or paid shill, so that we can set you straight.

Yeah this pretty much sums up deniers for me: attitude before substance.

Where’s your substance, dipshit? You posted nothing; you expected us to reply to it? I posted substance; where’s your refutation of it?

Fuck You Fight Me.

Fuck you, jewish shill. You deign to perpetuate my genocide.

Okay, the researcher who found veery low amounts of CN in the concrete taken from the wall of the 'gas chamber' at I forget where. Okay, except that the lab that did the testing was given no instructions beyond what the CN content, and they pulverised the sample diluting it significantly.

So go take another one. The building is right there.

So is that a complete fabrication or does it in fact draw his conclusion into question?

How about you read the 30 handbooks of forensic evidence and get back to us, then? The answer is right there.

And no I didn't make any claims, on purpose.

How about that. Just like the jews; always nebulous, never settling on anything definite.

My post was only ot ask if I the only one to change his mind back.

Why should we believe you ever changed in the first place?

I never heard of Bletchley Park Decryptions per se, though I assume you mean the Enimga cypher

Bletchley Park was the place in Britain where the transmissions were intercepted/recorded.

according to what I read indicates they knew about the death camps early on.

Funny how they never show up in the actual transmissions, then, huh?

So who do I believe?

The truth. People don’t matter, dipshit. There is no reference to “death camps”, “genocide”, or any number of deaths greater than 250,000 for any reason other than wartime maladies in the actual decryptions themselves.

I'm not shilling for the Jews

You are INHERENTLY doing this by shilling a lie.

To be clear I never wanted to debate the issue

Just like jews. Too bad for you, then.

I don't really have any reply to your questions

That’s clear.

because #1 I cannot speak to them with any sort of authority

YOU’RE STILL FUCKING APPEALING TO AUTHORITY WHEN YOU, PERSONALLY, ARE BEING ASKED?! HOW JEWISH ARE YOU?

I no longer necessarily believe many claims made by deniers.

… THAT’S WHY YOU’RE BEING ASKED.

not only also sounded 100%

The problem is with YOUR PERSONAL COMPREHENSION, not with reality. The reality is that the holocaust did not happen in any form, period.

but looks at it from a larger perspective, which speaks to my earlier comments about cherry picking.

So… no. There is no “larger perspective”, there is no cherry picking, and you can’t even cite your claim. THE REALITY IS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Jews base their lives on numerology.
2. Jews want to steal the Holy Land.
3. Jews convince (threaten, steal, coerce, etc.) their puppet empire to declare the Holy Land as jewish soil.
4. This has absolutely no power or force since said empire doesn’t control it, so the jews lie to another nation to get them involved in a war which will GIVE control of the Holy Land to said empire.
5. Still not enough, though. No numbers involved.
6. Another war is created, this time with a fake genocide where fake numbers can be created
7. Now there’s physical justification (puppet empire owns the land), numerological justification (oy vey muh numbers!), and ideological “justification” (HOW HORRIBLE IT’S A GENOCIDE WE ARE SPECIAL WE ARE BETTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE GIVE US THIS LAND BECAUSE GENOCIDE HAPPENED BECAUSE WE SAY SO) for a jewish state.

That is the reason for “the holocaust.” Period. There is no other reason. It’s an invention. This is the “larger perspective.”

I am not trying to make an argument here

That’s clear.

I just was interested if anyone else had stepped away from holocaust denial

Why would they?

as I had

More like you never denied it in the first place.

Did 6 million-ish die as a result of Nazis? Yeah it was probably something like that

This is proven false by the jews’ own admission. This is proven false by the number of jews living in Nazi-occupied Europe. You have absolutely fucking nothing to go on.

Were they all done in gas chambers? Nope

Zero of them were, in fact.

And, always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

“HURRRRRRRRRRR DURRRRRRRRRRR MUH HORSHOFEEREE”

You’re fucking done. You’re clinically insane.

People generally go through three phases in understanding history:

(1) the simplified school version, i.e. "The Nazis have put Jews into death camps and gassed them."

(2) the edgelord version that shines light on things that the highly simplified school curriculum didn't touch, but in order to be contrarian rather than to get the whole picture, i.e. "There were also labour camps whose inhabitants died through supply shortages, not industrial murder, and there were even some leisurely camps like Theresienstadt, and the holocaust didn't happen."

(3) the enlightened whole picture, i.e. "Not all camps were death camps, some even were relatively pleasant, and not all Jews dying in camps died through the Holocaust - but yes, the nazis gassed 6 millions."

Most people only reach (1), never question it and view it as an annoying hurdle they need to take for a good grade, without ever developing a real interest into the subject. People who reach stage (2) are like those annoying teenagers who think that they are woke, that they have all figured it out and that the sheeple need to wake up. People who reach stage (3) are like the based, weary and disillusioned dads who have figured out that things aren't easy and obvious as they thought in their edgy teenage years, and that there is a reason why things are the way they are.

Congratulations for reaching Stage 3, stay critical and question everything. There are many other areas of your knowledge where you have never made it past stage 1 or stage 2. I know because everyone does, including me.

You have found evidence that supports 6 million?

This seems jewy. The holohoax is a hoax. Period. Its why it is illegal to investigate it or deny it DUH

Are you talking about the idea of Jews being put into concentration camps?

Or specifically "6 million Jews died from gas chambers"?

There are a lot of claims. The sheer volume of people supposedly gassed and cremated is beyond physics, and the Jewish censuses from before and after WWII don't support such high numbers of deaths.

Definitely many did die, and Jews were specifically targetted (along with many others). But the thing that seems to always get missed is nearly all holocaust deaths were Polish civilians and Soviet POWs, and only half were Jewish. We would expect lots of deaths when a country gets invaded, from many causes. These deaths seem to be lumped together as a specific targeted extermination, though. Forcing Germany to pay reparations would certainly encourage that.

People should take a trip to Auschwitz and see the prisoner cafeteria, store,theater,opera house, heated pool, library and soccer field. They should see how close the "gas chamber" is the the nazi officers quarters building (down wind) and then watch or read the Auschwitz survivor's admitting to lying. Yes the holocaust was real but not as described.

Quite the contrary. The Germans kept impeccable records and even tattooed their prisoners to keep an accurate catalogue. During the Nuremberg trials, those records were used against the awful Germans. 635,000 jews were interned. 60,000est were "slaughtered" with at least half dying of malnutrition when the efficient German machine was stopped. Prison guards left their post and the timid jew sat starving until rescued by the benevolent white man. Keep doing research...or get a better script. Your shit is weak and wrong.

Sorry @Crensch but this dipshit needs to be put in his place, and I don’t seem to have your standard disproof link anymore.

It was pretty easy to jump on the band wagon and become a holocaust denier

Yeah, facts will do that to you.

But something never sat right with me

About the holocaust.

something along the lines of if it was so obvious why are deniers a minority.

Not an argument. Appeal to authority. Appeal to majority. Appeal to popularity. Do you know anything about continental drift?

So I did a bunch of research independent of any forums

Such as purchasing a 1947 Encyclopedia Britannica to see that it makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of any holocaust, any genocide, and only says “thousands died in Nazi work camps”?

Oh, no, you didn’t do that.

I really did have to agree that:

Truth is not a matter of agreement. No one cares what you agreed with.

1. Deniers cherrypick.

Doesn’t happen. Fuck off.

I was overwhelmed by the sheer volume of war related documentation there is

So overwhelmed, in fact, that you likely didn’t read any of it. You didn’t read the Bletchley Park Decryptions* which show that there was no genocide planned, ordered, or carried out by any Germans anywhere, much less in the camps, and also shows that only 60,000 died at Auschwitz of typhus and malnutrition. You also didn’t read the post-Cold War German documents captured by the Soviets that were released, which show the same.

deniers only ever seem to use the few bits that suit their purpose

No, you’re thinking of jews. Such as when the Shoah Foundation only publicized the interviews that said it happened, and hid all the ones where the jews talk about “wow the beer we could buy was so watery” and “oy vey I had to draw the musical notation lines onto the paper they gave me because they didn’t have special musical paper already made!”

1. Overwhelming evidence about the gas chambers NOT being gas chambers turned out to not be so overwhelming afterall.

Except, you know, for the forensic evidence that proves they didn’t exist. And the physical impossibility of moving the gas in that fashion. And the physical impossibility of venting the room. And the physical impossibility of burning the bodies before they rotted. And the physical impossibility of burning that many bodies in the timeframe allotted. And the physical impossibility of burning ANY bodies WITHOUT FUEL, THAT ALLIED SPY RAIDS SHOW NEVER EXISTED.

Again deniers seem to only use evidence or methodology that suited their objectives.

Isn’t it funny how you refuse to substantiate any of your claims here?

So either the Jewish conspiracy is so huge and well funded that they are able to perpetuate a hoax of a scale grander than I can even imagine.

YES. THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING. You are saying “HURR DURR I TOO SMART TO BE FOOLED (because i say so) THEREFORE IT NO HAPPEN HURRRRRRRR” and thinking yourself a literal fucking god. You’re a solipsist of the highest degree. “I am the smartest being in the universe and anything which contradicts my experiences is not real.”

Or there actually is a lot of truth there.

There is no truth to any aspect of the holocaust narrative. “The camps existed and jews were put there” isn’t part of the narrative, because that has nothing to do with “a holocaust.” You know that words have definitions, right? “Holocaust” is a biblical term. Specifically, a Torahic one. Noah offered a holocaust unto the Lord when he got off the boat. Says it right in the Bible. Now what the fuck do you think THAT means, kiddo? Noah killed 6 million of his fellow kikes right then and there? But I thought that there weren’t too many left? Hmm… Maybe it means “A SACRIFICE BY FIRE”, as the jews did with animals millennia ago, and with Christian children today.

So “the holocaust” narrative means “being put into ovens and burned.” But we know that didn’t happen. So the holocaust didn’t happen.

Post something of substance if you’re not a coward or paid shill, so that we can set you straight.

I feel like the evidence that the holocaust is at least misrepresented is pretty compelling. Its hard to get straight facts from that era though. The gas chambers were likely delousing chambers. Most deaths in the camps can be attributed to famine and disease from intense allied bombing. Only the camps that were not allowed to be inspected by post-war counsel were deemed death camps. Archeological evidence the camps were altered to appear like death camps after the war. These are all things I've at least read about, but who knows?

The most damning evidence to me is modern day consequences for challenging the narrative. If the ideas countering the holocaust narrative are so benign and easily defeated then why must we persecute 90 year-olds who espouse such ideas? Why not let them compete in public forum and be trounced with logic? This is my crux with the holocaust narrative.

No. Same as with Ron Paul. No one has ever said, "I USED to support Ron Paul."

Ideas come to through legit thought and research aren't easily swayed.