I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
Posted automatically (#62336) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
I guess I've been too subtle when I repeatedly said, for months, that everyone's information is public. I asked if I should share the information I had when my site was attacked and nobody bothered to say yes or no... it was just a carnival of insults. Maybe everyone is ready to listen because I'd rather get back to posting good research and help solve some really glaring problems in government that merely need some exposure.
How many more criminal records would you wager it would take to finally get them to stop haunting me?
How many more criminal records would you wager it would take to finally get them to stop haunting me?
If I were you, I'd unload it all. The reason they're stalking you is because you have the information that can destroy them and they're just getting ahead of the game of slander in an attempt to both dissuade you and make more people question you if/when you finally do.
Full transparency. Dump it all. Fuck all of them. Just my two cents.
And yes, I'm saying that from someone who currently has an excel spreadsheet on posts for 5 years that accidentally DDoS'd Voat at one point because it checks about twice a second on every post it's indexed. (I apologized to Putt, it was years ago)
Heh. Noone is stalking him is the the thing. Ho got a couple downvoats a while back (literally one or two) because he was rapid spamming submissions to his pizzagatenews sub or whatever it is. Of course he imediately blamed Vindicator or those who are friends with him for it.
I don't think you understand the nature of the person you are talking to. I've tried to reason with him time and time again. Take a position contrary to his and you'll find yourself on a list too. That's been my experience anyway.
You keep being dishonest. Also, you have a wicked double standard because you supported @srazyie 's behavior and only now that she got doxxed are you having this conversation when I tried to have the same conversation months ago.
I am not opposed to the idea. Like Wikileaks, you can see how just a little bit of leaked information can send them into a tailspin. Their group dynamic suffered to the utmost extreme and they exposed themselves because dishonest people cannot escape honesty traps, whereas honest people cannot be trapped by an honesty trap. You can see 3 months ago where I already knew @srayzie was not being entirely truthful with us.
At that time I explained clearly that I was going to set a number of honesty traps to people I felt were being dishonest. Not all of those honesty traps have triggered, yet. So, sharing everything would still be premature. But sharing something? Probably an okay idea. I've had a lot of help on the way by a few smart people, and I'll start by asking them.
My time frame is paced to the election and given the rate of their self destructing credibility, I haven't really had a need to do anything other than show up and state my opinion once a week, or so. They made so many enemies that they are experiencing death by 1000 cuts.
One issue I have is I need to be sure about a few more things. I haven't really spent much time on this, but I'll take a closer look because shill farms are worth a look at. I have more data than I have time to sift through. Jeffrey Epstein's arrest might slow me down, because I have to do my due diligence, there, again. Sharing is also a logistical issue for me because of the volume of data. I can't just upload a single spreadsheet or a zip file until I've narrowed it all down. I should probably make a torrent or something. I've got so many leaked databases saved that I could probably start my own private intelligence company.
I'll think about what you said and try to have some ideas for you, soon. I'm thinking some type of solution to merge databases and just start by cross referencing usernames in an automated fashion, as opposed to one at a timing it. This idea, of course, will terrify everyone. It can also help identify ways for people to better protect themselves, as well.
I was recently presented with a few interesting samples of how to sift using a comparative analysis across a lot of users... like http://www.redditinvestigator.com/ but in bulk. I haven't tried it, yet, but it looks like you can type keywords that can help find users using alts. If you picked srayzie's most typical insults, like "faggot" then did a search, you can find other possible alts to look at. Insults are good indicators because people have a personal style to the way they insult others.
Either way, I'll think about it. Something public that everyone could use would be nice to keep the playing field level.
Posted automatically (#62362) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
This is a transparency ping. My post has remained unchanged since I edited it for a typo, and it should be clear to everyone it was made before various objections were made.
To be very clear, my offer is no longer on the table.
He'll probably write some long-winded reply that dances around your questions without really answering them. At least that has been my experience with that user. I wouldn't have a problem with him if he just did what he says he is here to do: research. I don't know if he's just butthurt because we got pissed off and took a shit on him because he was saying he was gonna dox @Vindicator a few months back or if there is something else going on with him. Either way he has entirely exhausted any goodwill from me.
Stop making stuff up. Why do you keep lying about me? None of what you are saying is true.
I do research. I am not posting it on Voat, atm, with any kind of requency because of people like you who keep making false accusations. What is your real agenda?
Chaotic good is an option dear Sir, in my understanding Chaotic Neutral lies for its own benefit regardless of the price to others and may be viewed as hypocritical in nature.
We don’t disagree, like I said the definition of it could be miss leading.
Showing the cards of your enemies is very tactful in nature and if you are concerned for the greater good at the end of it; then in essence you may actually be more aligned to Chaotic Good at the end of the day, just saying. :)
I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
Posted automatically (#62335) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Posted automatically (#57230) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
gothamgirl is a doxxing, harassing drug user with a voat-banned husbando after their tirade of doxxing, harassment, pinging pedos onto kids, and threatening to kill kids.
they're not victims. they're being punished and are guilty.
@srayzie is factually what you accuse @gothamgirl of being... which is conjecture, on your part.
Why do you have the double standard?
Also, you failed to answer my questions.
Should I be expected to just let my site be attacked and do nothing? Or should I react in a way that stops the attack? (I reacted it worked, problem solved. No more attacks.)
Should I have stood by and allowed @srayzie to harass multiple people, threaten lawsuits and call me a shill? (Again, this problem seems to have been solved by the existence of her criminal record.)
What solutions would you recommend that would have provided the same results?
Posted automatically (#62371) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
bullshit her face just accidentally slipped into the algorithm
What? I searched the pictures she posted, herself, using a facial recognition service. Even Bing has one. Upload anyone's face picture to bing and it will find similar faces.
what results? say them
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
Posted automatically (#62369) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
Reasons for what? You lost me.
well the thing done doesnt relate one goddamn bit so no wonder you drew a blank.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
You brought up my website. It is specifically why I responded to your comment where you brought up my site. You brought it up so I don't understand your criticism here. Can you please help me understand why when you bring it up it is relevant, but when I bring it up it is not? Help me understand your double standard.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill. I merely responded. I was not the aggressor, she and her friends were. Am I not allowed to defend myself? Again, I asked you to propose an alternative course of action, but you have given me nothing.
Every single point you've attempted to make is invalid. But, maybe you can help me understand. From where I sit, you just look emotional and are acting like a sore loser.
The lesson here for everyone is... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I have a bag full of stupid prizes and I bet a few other people do, too.
Posted automatically (#62368) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Posted automatically (#52041) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
You brought up my website.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
How is providing information provided by the state of California "doxxing"? It is publicly available.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
You just proved that you are not worth discussing anything with because you rely on insults, false logic and poor sophistry.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
I admitted to posting publicly available information that was provided by the State of California which you, yourself, are free to search, if you like. I know the legal definitions involved and @puttitout and @atko were not enforcing any kind of bans against doxxing before @srayzie was exposed.
What is your definition of doxxing? Because it sounds to me like your problem is with the State of California. Maybe you should write them a letter.
If @srayzie ever bothered to show up for court and pay her fines, she could have her record sealed.
Thus far, you have refused to answer any reasonable questions and I kept up with your dialogue to see if there was any substance to your claims. There is not.
You are biased, insulting, not using any kind of reasoned argument and the only question I have left is as to why you are so emotionally compromised and irrational. Did you get tit pics and are white knighting for a thot? Or did you not get tit pics and are under the impression you might still have a chance if you keep fighting for @srayzie, the known criminal.
By the way, i've been doxxed. I didn't react like a whiny little bitch. It isn't the information that is the problem. It is what people DO with the information. A call to harass is a crime. Exposing the truth is a virtue. Maybe you should reflect on that and stop being an ass.
Posted automatically (#62366) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Because @virge is slandering me and I offered him a chance to prove it. He signs NDAs at his lawyer’s office, meet in person, and he gets all my accounts and what ever info Putt can pull from anon postings. He is free to then say whatever he wants about me. The NDAs cover private’s PM info and my real world identity.
I told him 100k US dollars.
He has ghosted me ever since I posted that deal. He’s a larp and he scared to even address the fact he likes slandering me without even having balls to ping me.
I really like this account I haven’t checked @virge link yet but I can’t think of anything off hand that I dislike about virge (besides of course slandering @whiteRonin ) that said ain’t a 100k a bit rich for a voat acct?? It’s fairly ridiculous to presume anyone would pay that.
Of course he doesn’t want to pay it. But he’s always talking about his lawyer, his international business skills, his wealth that he can afford fine whiskey and cigars and is very comfortable in life. Yet, he slanders me and thinks I won’t call him on it. I did and he runs like a yellow belly chicken. He also probably thinks I use all my alts to down vote him. He won’t face me. Look at my posting history and see how he never responds directly to me. Don’t forget he deleted his unwanted history. You do know that he records everything in excel over the last 4 years and makes annotations about his interactions, right? Ever notice that his down votes always remain yet his history shows very little of up votes yet he’s got a mass of imaginary points. He’s also a builder!
Don’t believe what I say. Verify my words. I have a slew of posts calling him out about this. Look at his history and it’s mostly about guns.
Ya see this is what I find interesting he’s knowledgeable on guns seems very pro 1a/2a that’s why I’d like to sort out what can be done about the bumping of horns. People like us need to be on the same team. We all got bigger fish to fry.UNITE THE RIGHT
See, the original trouble started when he thought he could put fancy with frilly words and turn my points around and tried to make me look dumb.
I’m dumb.
But I saw through his game and called him out. Nigger couldn’t get past the gate I was standing at.
He then tried to make it look like I was a gonna push transparency because I called his crap out and he was all a gloating about how he got me. Well, that nigger once again tried to say from Day X in the future. He said I didn’t have balls to accept that. I told him to break the walls of hell down and open up all past history and at which time I caught he migger deleting shit. Zero transparency for builder Virge. He says I got alts and more alts. I said let’s do it. Open up the transparency gates and let Voat destroy itself. He couldn’t comprehend how Voat would totally go against my version of transparency. I later find out he’s playing on Team Syrazie and she has like 20-40 alts herself. Putt killed off 4 of them recently. During that transparency debate I called him and told him to put his money on the table and prove it by buying access to my accounts. He just boom ghosted me.
And now he lurks in shadows telling people like you bull shit stories.
I don’t care what his gun stance is. It’s the only history on voat he doesn’t delete even when most of his shit is negative counts.
I find it hard to believe anything he says is true. People don’t need to hide something if they are legit. He ensures his history is represented the way he wants. He rewrites history to ensure his narrative is clean. Why? Because he does it was his answer. Some bull shit deflection.
So, if you wanna like him over his pro-gun chats. Go for it. However, many others like me also believe in gun ownsershop rights and have no problem with people blowing holes in fuckers who invaded your property.
In my opinion (and that’s all this is) @virge is like a helper I think he deletes comments for fear of criticism.thats all it really is to me.You win let it go
You know TV is just not what it used to be and these spouts are often viewed purely as entertainment and also you are very unusual... so the question is like who are you?
Are you nefarious or an honest user, someone who can be trusted or do you glow in the dark?
Dude you have pretty much admitted to documenting data here, hopefully just your own otherwise others without consent...
Yeah, my OPSEC alarms go ringing, others do too and then you may witness clash of the titans coming to a subverse near you.
If you are truly an honest user with smarts then that has to be tested and hopefully confirmed...
Just my late night ramblings, not that you were speaking to me but merely using me as an in-between in your little online discourse with WR...
Posted automatically (#52010) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52009) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52008) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52007) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52006) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52005) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52004) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52003) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52002) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52001) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#52000) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
Posted automatically (#51999) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
Posted automatically (#51997) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#51996) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#51995) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#51994) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#51993) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Posted automatically (#51992) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
Redcobra ago
@thewebofslime is the hero Voat deserves
thewebofslime ago
I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
https://i.imgur.com/2FNOien.jpg
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62336) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
virge ago
@thewebofslime I wouldn't even grace this bullshit with a reply. I did it for you, let your silence speak volumes.
thewebofslime ago
I guess I've been too subtle when I repeatedly said, for months, that everyone's information is public. I asked if I should share the information I had when my site was attacked and nobody bothered to say yes or no... it was just a carnival of insults. Maybe everyone is ready to listen because I'd rather get back to posting good research and help solve some really glaring problems in government that merely need some exposure.
How many more criminal records would you wager it would take to finally get them to stop haunting me?
virge ago
If I were you, I'd unload it all. The reason they're stalking you is because you have the information that can destroy them and they're just getting ahead of the game of slander in an attempt to both dissuade you and make more people question you if/when you finally do.
Full transparency. Dump it all. Fuck all of them. Just my two cents.
And yes, I'm saying that from someone who currently has an excel spreadsheet on posts for 5 years that accidentally DDoS'd Voat at one point because it checks about twice a second on every post it's indexed. (I apologized to Putt, it was years ago)
Imagine if we combined our data together.
SandHog ago
Heh. Noone is stalking him is the the thing. Ho got a couple downvoats a while back (literally one or two) because he was rapid spamming submissions to his pizzagatenews sub or whatever it is. Of course he imediately blamed Vindicator or those who are friends with him for it.
I don't think you understand the nature of the person you are talking to. I've tried to reason with him time and time again. Take a position contrary to his and you'll find yourself on a list too. That's been my experience anyway.
thewebofslime ago
You keep being dishonest. Also, you have a wicked double standard because you supported @srazyie 's behavior and only now that she got doxxed are you having this conversation when I tried to have the same conversation months ago.
thewebofslime ago
I am not opposed to the idea. Like Wikileaks, you can see how just a little bit of leaked information can send them into a tailspin. Their group dynamic suffered to the utmost extreme and they exposed themselves because dishonest people cannot escape honesty traps, whereas honest people cannot be trapped by an honesty trap. You can see 3 months ago where I already knew @srayzie was not being entirely truthful with us.
https://voat.co/v/thewebofslime/3132012/17753489
At that time I explained clearly that I was going to set a number of honesty traps to people I felt were being dishonest. Not all of those honesty traps have triggered, yet. So, sharing everything would still be premature. But sharing something? Probably an okay idea. I've had a lot of help on the way by a few smart people, and I'll start by asking them.
My time frame is paced to the election and given the rate of their self destructing credibility, I haven't really had a need to do anything other than show up and state my opinion once a week, or so. They made so many enemies that they are experiencing death by 1000 cuts.
One issue I have is I need to be sure about a few more things. I haven't really spent much time on this, but I'll take a closer look because shill farms are worth a look at. I have more data than I have time to sift through. Jeffrey Epstein's arrest might slow me down, because I have to do my due diligence, there, again. Sharing is also a logistical issue for me because of the volume of data. I can't just upload a single spreadsheet or a zip file until I've narrowed it all down. I should probably make a torrent or something. I've got so many leaked databases saved that I could probably start my own private intelligence company.
I'll think about what you said and try to have some ideas for you, soon. I'm thinking some type of solution to merge databases and just start by cross referencing usernames in an automated fashion, as opposed to one at a timing it. This idea, of course, will terrify everyone. It can also help identify ways for people to better protect themselves, as well.
I was recently presented with a few interesting samples of how to sift using a comparative analysis across a lot of users... like http://www.redditinvestigator.com/ but in bulk. I haven't tried it, yet, but it looks like you can type keywords that can help find users using alts. If you picked srayzie's most typical insults, like "faggot" then did a search, you can find other possible alts to look at. Insults are good indicators because people have a personal style to the way they insult others.
Either way, I'll think about it. Something public that everyone could use would be nice to keep the playing field level.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62362) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
virge ago
Please respond to my line of inquiry in the ProtectGoats thread before we continue any further. I no longer stand by my previous posts until you do.
https://voat.co/v/ProtectGoats/3319514/19597380
virge ago
@sguevar @sandhog @Corpse_washer @crensch @argosciv
This is a transparency ping. My post has remained unchanged since I edited it for a typo, and it should be clear to everyone it was made before various objections were made.
To be very clear, my offer is no longer on the table.
SandHog ago
What changed, virge?
virge ago
It should be clear. I asked some questions about his collection habits and he ignored all of them.
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt he's taking his time to respond, but at this point it appears he's going to abstain.
Designation would be immediately resolved as hostile given my questions.
@sguevar @adeshda @Corpse_washer @crensch @argosciv
SandHog ago
He'll probably write some long-winded reply that dances around your questions without really answering them. At least that has been my experience with that user. I wouldn't have a problem with him if he just did what he says he is here to do: research. I don't know if he's just butthurt because we got pissed off and took a shit on him because he was saying he was gonna dox @Vindicator a few months back or if there is something else going on with him. Either way he has entirely exhausted any goodwill from me.
thewebofslime ago
Stop making stuff up. Why do you keep lying about me? None of what you are saying is true.
I do research. I am not posting it on Voat, atm, with any kind of requency because of people like you who keep making false accusations. What is your real agenda?
Nadeshda ago
I think he is busy researching the Epstein case and just sporadically looking in, he alluded to that in his comment to you.
https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/3317546/19600356
virge ago
That's the reason I said I'm waiting for a reply.
virge ago
@Nadeshda this is a signal flare.
Nadeshda ago
Beauseant is a war-cry of the ancient Templars.
Chaotic good is an option dear Sir, in my understanding Chaotic Neutral lies for its own benefit regardless of the price to others and may be viewed as hypocritical in nature.
virge ago
We find ourselves at a point where we disagree.
There are times when the tactic of the enemy is necessary to determine your enemy in the first place.
Nadeshda ago
We don’t disagree, like I said the definition of it could be miss leading.
Showing the cards of your enemies is very tactful in nature and if you are concerned for the greater good at the end of it; then in essence you may actually be more aligned to Chaotic Good at the end of the day, just saying. :)
virge ago
This is the end state of any Crusade. It's iteritive.
theoldones ago
also, member how the website for webofslime tracks your damned IP?
thewebofslime ago
I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
https://i.imgur.com/2FNOien.jpg
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62335) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#57230) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
virge ago
This entire post made me laugh at how glad I am I've never used Linkedin for my line of work.
theoldones ago
gothamgirl is a doxxing, harassing drug user with a voat-banned husbando after their tirade of doxxing, harassment, pinging pedos onto kids, and threatening to kill kids.
they're not victims. they're being punished and are guilty.
thewebofslime ago
@srayzie is factually what you accuse @gothamgirl of being... which is conjecture, on your part.
Why do you have the double standard?
Also, you failed to answer my questions.
Should I be expected to just let my site be attacked and do nothing? Or should I react in a way that stops the attack? (I reacted it worked, problem solved. No more attacks.)
Should I have stood by and allowed @srayzie to harass multiple people, threaten lawsuits and call me a shill? (Again, this problem seems to have been solved by the existence of her criminal record.)
What solutions would you recommend that would have provided the same results?
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62371) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
theoldones ago
not fucking doxxing srayzie might be an idea, since bullshit her face just accidentally slipped into the algorithm
what results? say them
for what reasons? say them
thewebofslime ago
@srazyie doxxed first. Invalid argument.
What? I searched the pictures she posted, herself, using a facial recognition service. Even Bing has one. Upload anyone's face picture to bing and it will find similar faces.
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
Reasons for what? You lost me.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62369) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
theoldones ago
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
well the thing done doesnt relate one goddamn bit so no wonder you drew a blank.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
thewebofslime ago
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
You brought up my website. It is specifically why I responded to your comment where you brought up my site. You brought it up so I don't understand your criticism here. Can you please help me understand why when you bring it up it is relevant, but when I bring it up it is not? Help me understand your double standard.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill. I merely responded. I was not the aggressor, she and her friends were. Am I not allowed to defend myself? Again, I asked you to propose an alternative course of action, but you have given me nothing.
Every single point you've attempted to make is invalid. But, maybe you can help me understand. From where I sit, you just look emotional and are acting like a sore loser.
The lesson here for everyone is... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I have a bag full of stupid prizes and I bet a few other people do, too.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62368) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/BloodOfEurope submission by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#52041) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
theoldones ago
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
thewebofslime ago
How is providing information provided by the state of California "doxxing"? It is publicly available.
You just proved that you are not worth discussing anything with because you rely on insults, false logic and poor sophistry.
I admitted to posting publicly available information that was provided by the State of California which you, yourself, are free to search, if you like. I know the legal definitions involved and @puttitout and @atko were not enforcing any kind of bans against doxxing before @srayzie was exposed.
What is your definition of doxxing? Because it sounds to me like your problem is with the State of California. Maybe you should write them a letter.
If @srayzie ever bothered to show up for court and pay her fines, she could have her record sealed.
Thus far, you have refused to answer any reasonable questions and I kept up with your dialogue to see if there was any substance to your claims. There is not.
You are biased, insulting, not using any kind of reasoned argument and the only question I have left is as to why you are so emotionally compromised and irrational. Did you get tit pics and are white knighting for a thot? Or did you not get tit pics and are under the impression you might still have a chance if you keep fighting for @srayzie, the known criminal.
By the way, i've been doxxed. I didn't react like a whiny little bitch. It isn't the information that is the problem. It is what people DO with the information. A call to harass is a crime. Exposing the truth is a virtue. Maybe you should reflect on that and stop being an ass.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62366) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
So was everything the user @ScrubbinOutOldBlue posted. Why was he banned, and you were not?
thewebofslime ago
The repeated efforts.
theoldones ago
you still posted her private info. that's a doxx.
blah blah blah suck my dick
thewebofslime ago
It is public info. You already lost that argument repeatedly. You lack the ability to have an adult conversation. Blocked.
virge ago
Oh noes, he knows your VPN's external IP. ALERT CNN WE HAVE BREAKING NEWS.
Looking up someones pictures to see if they match their face is not doxxing you fuckin' spergie.
404: Outrage not found, just fucking Boomer tier logic about how the world works.
theoldones ago
many people dont have VPNs you dickhole
virge ago
And those people don't care about privacy in the first place, you Boomer faggot.
Redcobra ago
That time I publicly agree w virge
virge ago
And all those other times I also thought you were agreeing with me.
Nadeshda ago
Lol... dude!
virge ago
Haha.
WhiteRonin ago
https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/3317546/19575015
Haha!
Redcobra ago
Oh yeah I’d like a briefing on why you and @whiteRonin initially started bumping horns.
WhiteRonin ago
Because @virge is slandering me and I offered him a chance to prove it. He signs NDAs at his lawyer’s office, meet in person, and he gets all my accounts and what ever info Putt can pull from anon postings. He is free to then say whatever he wants about me. The NDAs cover private’s PM info and my real world identity.
I told him 100k US dollars.
He has ghosted me ever since I posted that deal. He’s a larp and he scared to even address the fact he likes slandering me without even having balls to ping me.
Redcobra ago
I really like this account I haven’t checked @virge link yet but I can’t think of anything off hand that I dislike about virge (besides of course slandering @whiteRonin ) that said ain’t a 100k a bit rich for a voat acct?? It’s fairly ridiculous to presume anyone would pay that.
WhiteRonin ago
Of course he doesn’t want to pay it. But he’s always talking about his lawyer, his international business skills, his wealth that he can afford fine whiskey and cigars and is very comfortable in life. Yet, he slanders me and thinks I won’t call him on it. I did and he runs like a yellow belly chicken. He also probably thinks I use all my alts to down vote him. He won’t face me. Look at my posting history and see how he never responds directly to me. Don’t forget he deleted his unwanted history. You do know that he records everything in excel over the last 4 years and makes annotations about his interactions, right? Ever notice that his down votes always remain yet his history shows very little of up votes yet he’s got a mass of imaginary points. He’s also a builder!
Don’t believe what I say. Verify my words. I have a slew of posts calling him out about this. Look at his history and it’s mostly about guns.
Redcobra ago
Ya see this is what I find interesting he’s knowledgeable on guns seems very pro 1a/2a that’s why I’d like to sort out what can be done about the bumping of horns. People like us need to be on the same team. We all got bigger fish to fry.UNITE THE RIGHT
WhiteRonin ago
See, the original trouble started when he thought he could put fancy with frilly words and turn my points around and tried to make me look dumb.
I’m dumb.
But I saw through his game and called him out. Nigger couldn’t get past the gate I was standing at.
He then tried to make it look like I was a gonna push transparency because I called his crap out and he was all a gloating about how he got me. Well, that nigger once again tried to say from Day X in the future. He said I didn’t have balls to accept that. I told him to break the walls of hell down and open up all past history and at which time I caught he migger deleting shit. Zero transparency for builder Virge. He says I got alts and more alts. I said let’s do it. Open up the transparency gates and let Voat destroy itself. He couldn’t comprehend how Voat would totally go against my version of transparency. I later find out he’s playing on Team Syrazie and she has like 20-40 alts herself. Putt killed off 4 of them recently. During that transparency debate I called him and told him to put his money on the table and prove it by buying access to my accounts. He just boom ghosted me.
And now he lurks in shadows telling people like you bull shit stories.
I don’t care what his gun stance is. It’s the only history on voat he doesn’t delete even when most of his shit is negative counts.
I find it hard to believe anything he says is true. People don’t need to hide something if they are legit. He ensures his history is represented the way he wants. He rewrites history to ensure his narrative is clean. Why? Because he does it was his answer. Some bull shit deflection.
So, if you wanna like him over his pro-gun chats. Go for it. However, many others like me also believe in gun ownsershop rights and have no problem with people blowing holes in fuckers who invaded your property.
Redcobra ago
In my opinion (and that’s all this is) @virge is like a helper I think he deletes comments for fear of criticism.thats all it really is to me.You win let it go
virge ago
He doesn't even remember. I do. I made a post one day and he's been doing what he's doing now ever since.
You tell me what you think about that. I think I hit a bit too close to home and he's been trying to run me off ever since.
WhiteRonin ago
Shekels! Buy me out nigger!
WhiteRonin ago
https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/3317546/19575015 .. .
Nadeshda ago
I guess it is like free advertising, keep dropping that post and see if it gets traction... :)
virge ago
That's the only thing @WhiteRonin is good for.
WhiteRonin ago
Niggers like you always run when confronted
Nadeshda ago
That’s not nice... stawp
virge ago
If he stops giving me the opportunity, I'd love to.
Never let a good opportunity go to waste.
WhiteRonin ago
Hey Jew ! Buy me out!
Chicken fagget
WhiteRonin ago
https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/3317546/19575015
. ..
Nadeshda ago
Dude you guys... man... totally a dude thing... lol
virge ago
Pretty sure I broke him, actually. The whole ignoring thing really seemed to get to him.
I actually might legitimately be impossible for part of his mental breakdown. I should feel bad. In his case, I don't.
Nadeshda ago
No you didn’t break him, lol...
You know TV is just not what it used to be and these spouts are often viewed purely as entertainment and also you are very unusual... so the question is like who are you?
Are you nefarious or an honest user, someone who can be trusted or do you glow in the dark?
Dude you have pretty much admitted to documenting data here, hopefully just your own otherwise others without consent...
Yeah, my OPSEC alarms go ringing, others do too and then you may witness clash of the titans coming to a subverse near you.
If you are truly an honest user with smarts then that has to be tested and hopefully confirmed...
Just my late night ramblings, not that you were speaking to me but merely using me as an in-between in your little online discourse with WR...
virge ago
There is no such thing.
Why? To what end? I don't want to join anyone's group - all the groups I see on Voat are faggots.
WhiteRonin ago
Niggers like you run when confronted.
https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/3317546/19575015
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52010) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/TheGunClub submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52009) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/AskVoat comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52008) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52007) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52006) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52005) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Showerthoughts comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52004) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Showerthoughts comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52003) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Showerthoughts comment by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52002) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Correction submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#52001) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV submission.
Posted automatically (#52000) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRVoat submission.
Posted automatically (#51999) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/OldGoatsFamily submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51997) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/AskVoat submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51996) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/WTF submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51995) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51994) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/BEATLESTROLLARMY submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51993) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/SoapboxBanhammer submission by @WhiteRonin.
Posted automatically (#51992) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@virge: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @WhiteRonin)
WhiteRonin ago
Buy me out larp!
WhiteRonin ago
Tsk tsk tsk @redcobra
He’s pointing to what he wants. Lol
Redcobra ago
Ok thanks for the link I’ll get to it after dinner so I’ll be in touch then
Redcobra ago
Ya but this time I’m publicly stating I do also @webofslime is a good account idkw old ones would fuck w/ him and ride w/ srayzie but whatever