I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
gothamgirl is a doxxing, harassing drug user with a voat-banned husbando after their tirade of doxxing, harassment, pinging pedos onto kids, and threatening to kill kids.
they're not victims. they're being punished and are guilty.
@srayzie is factually what you accuse @gothamgirl of being... which is conjecture, on your part.
Why do you have the double standard?
Also, you failed to answer my questions.
Should I be expected to just let my site be attacked and do nothing? Or should I react in a way that stops the attack? (I reacted it worked, problem solved. No more attacks.)
Should I have stood by and allowed @srayzie to harass multiple people, threaten lawsuits and call me a shill? (Again, this problem seems to have been solved by the existence of her criminal record.)
What solutions would you recommend that would have provided the same results?
bullshit her face just accidentally slipped into the algorithm
What? I searched the pictures she posted, herself, using a facial recognition service. Even Bing has one. Upload anyone's face picture to bing and it will find similar faces.
what results? say them
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
Reasons for what? You lost me.
well the thing done doesnt relate one goddamn bit so no wonder you drew a blank.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
You brought up my website. It is specifically why I responded to your comment where you brought up my site. You brought it up so I don't understand your criticism here. Can you please help me understand why when you bring it up it is relevant, but when I bring it up it is not? Help me understand your double standard.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill. I merely responded. I was not the aggressor, she and her friends were. Am I not allowed to defend myself? Again, I asked you to propose an alternative course of action, but you have given me nothing.
Every single point you've attempted to make is invalid. But, maybe you can help me understand. From where I sit, you just look emotional and are acting like a sore loser.
The lesson here for everyone is... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I have a bag full of stupid prizes and I bet a few other people do, too.
Posted automatically (#62368) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Posted automatically (#52041) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
You brought up my website.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
How is providing information provided by the state of California "doxxing"? It is publicly available.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
You just proved that you are not worth discussing anything with because you rely on insults, false logic and poor sophistry.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
I admitted to posting publicly available information that was provided by the State of California which you, yourself, are free to search, if you like. I know the legal definitions involved and @puttitout and @atko were not enforcing any kind of bans against doxxing before @srayzie was exposed.
What is your definition of doxxing? Because it sounds to me like your problem is with the State of California. Maybe you should write them a letter.
If @srayzie ever bothered to show up for court and pay her fines, she could have her record sealed.
Thus far, you have refused to answer any reasonable questions and I kept up with your dialogue to see if there was any substance to your claims. There is not.
You are biased, insulting, not using any kind of reasoned argument and the only question I have left is as to why you are so emotionally compromised and irrational. Did you get tit pics and are white knighting for a thot? Or did you not get tit pics and are under the impression you might still have a chance if you keep fighting for @srayzie, the known criminal.
By the way, i've been doxxed. I didn't react like a whiny little bitch. It isn't the information that is the problem. It is what people DO with the information. A call to harass is a crime. Exposing the truth is a virtue. Maybe you should reflect on that and stop being an ass.
Posted automatically (#62366) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
view the rest of the comments →
theoldones ago
also, member how the website for webofslime tracks your damned IP?
thewebofslime ago
I'm totally happy to discuss my decisions behind this.
First, let me clarify that in my line of work, I already use facial recognition services. I did not sign up to specifically doxx @srayzie. I informed @shewhomustbeobeyed that I had run all of the pictures through facial recognition months ago. I sat on it, because I didn't want to get invovled despite multiple parties trying to drag me into it in weird ways. If you see what I do on reddit, where I am not under attack, you can see my posting is pretty straight forward and I mostly keep to myself.
Second, I would like you to consider your dishonesty or, possibly, ignorance, in how the Internet works. IPs are legally required to log IPs and every website keeps logs of IPs. If someone comes to my site, I don't bother looking up their IP. What I look at are the security logs that log the IP addresses of attacks. So, I started with the IP addresses of people who were maliciously using their computer against my database. Every site does that and your argument against me, in that regards, is completely disingenuous.
Furthermore, Google and Amazon use your own devices to report to the entire world where you are visiting. You can go to the stat sites hosted by many companies that are using your own device to track site visits. This means that, even if you use ad blocker, your device is betraying you. Google analytics is what I used to see who was going to and from my site, but ultimately, I have a cousin who is a professor of computer science who helped me set it all up and who found the attacks and who identified the attackers. I posted all of this information when it happened.
My site has far less tracking than Voat. In fact, all I have are security logs. Google is doxxing you constantly and it is making your information publicly available and it is far from the only one.
When this all went down, I came to Voat to ask them what to do and I was just met with false accusations, drastically reducing any sympathy I might have for users I had been familiar with for a while. @Vindicator wanted to paint me as the bad guy and called me a LARP, a David Brock shill, etc. Like @crensch, he also liked to insult for me not being "dangerous" or whatever but apparently sharing state information about crimes is the most dangerous thing on Voat, now? Enough to FINALLY make doxxing bannable?
I HAVE BEEN WARNING EVERYONE FOR MONTHS THAT NOBODY'S INFORMATION IS SAFE. Check out every post I've made in /v/ProtectVoat.
What I do is perfectly legal and ethical.
It is perfectly legal to look up someone's criminal history. I am not the criminal in this situation.
@srayzie repeatedly doxxed, but the complaint is when I doxx her? That is true hypocrisy.
I have been telling you all, if you read between the lines, that I had this information. I have been warning you all. Two things happened that aggravated me when I chose to share the .18 BAC DUI where @srazyie was also under the influence of other drugs. Years ago, I was in a car that was T boned by a drunk driver, killing one of my friends, who I watched die. This propelled me into a career in firefighting, which transformed into other things. I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers. They should be forced to sober up because their need to get loaded, in their mind, outweighs the rights of others to live.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit. Repeatedly, that is legally harassment. That is a crime that a court will grant a civil harassment restraining order for if it is repeated. @srayzie has also engaged in harassing MANY users and has NEVER avoided the opportunity to use personal information to harass them. I'm not the bad guy. I did not threaten to misuse the courts for a stupid vendetta. I would never use the courts in such a way and it is truly a lowlife scumbag who would. @sandhog responded by calling me the scumbag. Clearly, @srayzie is the scumbag and anyone who defends her behavior should be viewed with suspicion.
@Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
All I want is the downvote brigading against me to stop and for people to stop making the false claim that I am a shill. I laugh at the money a shill makes. My research is a hobby and I automate a lot of it so that I don't have to be on the Internet every day.
So, I have doxx. I am not all talk. If anything, I've been trying to politely say "STOP FUCKING WITH ME" and avoid wasting my time with this drama. I genuinely think there is a case for multiple parties to file for civil harassment restraining orders against the known criminal, @srayzie, and I stand by my offer to help anyone file for a restraining order against her who deserves it. I am familiar with the courthouse in her jurisdiction. I know the state and local forms and the people in the courtrooms.
And, as much as anyone wants to ban publicly available information from a STATE/COUNTY website, I say that, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, I DID NOT "DOXX". Most of you don't know what doxx even is.
So, go ahead and make more false accusations against me, but keep in mind, I might get fed up with it and do something about it. Voat wastes too much of my time for the amount of impressions/views it generates. It would help everyone if @srayzie and @crensch were banned. Then, you can see who is left still trying to create an uprising against @kevdude because it is almost certain they are a shill.
I get a lot of people don't like him, but when I see multiple false accusations against one person, I know that it is because of paid shills. Remember how everyone was accusing him of doxxing @srayzie? Well, everyone who did that is a stone cold liar and they are worth ostracizing if they aren't willing to apologize for it.
I don't downvote brigade ever.
I don't harass people with alts.
I didn't doxx anyone, I just posted publicly available information that anyone can get from searching for @srayzie's name in the Fresno and Kern county databases. Go ahead and you can see that I didn't share everything that was available. She loves to rack up "failure to appear" in her county.
The next person who threatens a lawsuit against people better be aware that there are those who actually know how to file lawsuits for free and write subpoenas for free.
@srayzie threatened @kevdude with a subpoena, which means you need a court case number and a clerk stamped form from a court clerk.
That was a bad idea on her part. I won't stand for it. I won't stand for sustained harassment that occasionally tries to wrap me up in the targeting. I didn't do anything except post good research and try to tell people how to solve the problem of Pizzagate. Guess what... that involves a lot of doxxing, as well.
Look at how easy it is to find FBI agents and "revolving door" government employees...
https://i.imgur.com/2FNOien.jpg
All you have to do is put names and addresses in your Google contacts list and the social media sites will find your targets for you.
Do you think that if all these Rothschild name and passwords https://pastebin.com/cB1DvFKb are publicly available but somehow, magically, yours are not? Stop deluding yourselves. I've been telling you over and over. It is all easy to find. It is all tracked and it is all leaked. The feeds and streams of data are open intentionally so that they can feed the machine learning/AI machines the government uses. You don't have to be a top secret entity to use these feeds.
Not only can your data be found, you can be found using publicly available cameras. https://www.earthcam.com/
Ethically, I have no problem with being given the ability to check up on government employees and agencies. The spy apparatus SHOULD be turned the other way. That is the only way equality will work out. @srayzie thought she was clever when she was doing some "lite doxxing" but the truth is that complete information about each and every one of you is publicly available. I HOPE YOU ARE ALL FINALLY HEARING ME.
I just want to do research and post information. I have automated scripts that archive everything off of /v/Pizzagate... what @shewhomustbeobeyed does manually. I have tools to catch actual criminals. Actual pedophiles. I actually report them and I have no problem going to court to testify against them. This drama is just a distraction. It is coordinated by shills. @crensch is a shill. @srazyie is a shill. If I wasn't under attack specifically by Voat members, I would have shared those tools with Voat long ago.
@srayzie (who has literally "done time") was finally able to start paying off her DUI when she got involved with GreatAwakening after years of not paying. So, she sits at home all day long on the Internet and finally has extra cash? Do the math. Paid shills should be banned from Voat. That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So, @theoldones, what was the alternative to my decisions? Let people hack my site and do nothing? Let this harassment and doxxing on Voat continue? No. I solved the problem by doxxing the golden child and, like magic, now doxxing is no longer okay for anyone. From where I sit, it looks like I earned a win for both sides. Doxxing is finally no longer tolerated.
Don't worry, everyone, though. I can still use Dissenter to post criminal records... which is totally legal to do. In fact, it is ethical to post people's criminal histories so that we can all warn each other about what kind of people really are. I have one case against me that was dismissed. If anyone finds it (I have been doxxed), then I will be happy to explain it.
Maybe all the "researchers" can get off their asses and start looking up the criminal records of suspected pedophiles and stop harassing @gothamgirl et al.
theoldones ago
gothamgirl is a doxxing, harassing drug user with a voat-banned husbando after their tirade of doxxing, harassment, pinging pedos onto kids, and threatening to kill kids.
they're not victims. they're being punished and are guilty.
thewebofslime ago
@srayzie is factually what you accuse @gothamgirl of being... which is conjecture, on your part.
Why do you have the double standard?
Also, you failed to answer my questions.
Should I be expected to just let my site be attacked and do nothing? Or should I react in a way that stops the attack? (I reacted it worked, problem solved. No more attacks.)
Should I have stood by and allowed @srayzie to harass multiple people, threaten lawsuits and call me a shill? (Again, this problem seems to have been solved by the existence of her criminal record.)
What solutions would you recommend that would have provided the same results?
theoldones ago
not fucking doxxing srayzie might be an idea, since bullshit her face just accidentally slipped into the algorithm
what results? say them
for what reasons? say them
thewebofslime ago
@srazyie doxxed first. Invalid argument.
What? I searched the pictures she posted, herself, using a facial recognition service. Even Bing has one. Upload anyone's face picture to bing and it will find similar faces.
The moment I spoke up about my site being attacked and shared details of how I was tracing attacks, the attacks stopped. They originated from Voat and they stopped when I took the problem to Voat.
Reasons for what? You lost me.
theoldones ago
explain you doing it to it srayzie being apparently okay, if gotham girl got harassed is not okay.
5 seconds ago you were arguing about srayzie, now you're talking the website. it kind of sounds like you dont have a point.
well the thing done doesnt relate one goddamn bit so no wonder you drew a blank.
YOU PARTICIPATED IN THE HARASSMENT OF SRAYZIE. you are guilty as a doxxer and harasser.
thewebofslime ago
I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. @srayzie doxxed multiple people and spent at least a year harassing @gothamgirl. In your book, that was okay. But when I do link publicly available information on a county website, it's not? I don't understand the double standard.
You brought up my website. It is specifically why I responded to your comment where you brought up my site. You brought it up so I don't understand your criticism here. Can you please help me understand why when you bring it up it is relevant, but when I bring it up it is not? Help me understand your double standard.
No, I didn't @srayzie harassed me and called me a shill. I merely responded. I was not the aggressor, she and her friends were. Am I not allowed to defend myself? Again, I asked you to propose an alternative course of action, but you have given me nothing.
Every single point you've attempted to make is invalid. But, maybe you can help me understand. From where I sit, you just look emotional and are acting like a sore loser.
The lesson here for everyone is... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I have a bag full of stupid prizes and I bet a few other people do, too.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62368) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/BloodOfEurope submission by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#52041) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
theoldones ago
please admit to more doxxing, the more you do you the shadier you look.
fuck off with that srayzie was the topic.
in the first quote in this comment you blatantly admitted to doxxing.
should i perhaps ping @Atko or @puttitout to make your confession official?
thewebofslime ago
How is providing information provided by the state of California "doxxing"? It is publicly available.
You just proved that you are not worth discussing anything with because you rely on insults, false logic and poor sophistry.
I admitted to posting publicly available information that was provided by the State of California which you, yourself, are free to search, if you like. I know the legal definitions involved and @puttitout and @atko were not enforcing any kind of bans against doxxing before @srayzie was exposed.
What is your definition of doxxing? Because it sounds to me like your problem is with the State of California. Maybe you should write them a letter.
If @srayzie ever bothered to show up for court and pay her fines, she could have her record sealed.
Thus far, you have refused to answer any reasonable questions and I kept up with your dialogue to see if there was any substance to your claims. There is not.
You are biased, insulting, not using any kind of reasoned argument and the only question I have left is as to why you are so emotionally compromised and irrational. Did you get tit pics and are white knighting for a thot? Or did you not get tit pics and are under the impression you might still have a chance if you keep fighting for @srayzie, the known criminal.
By the way, i've been doxxed. I didn't react like a whiny little bitch. It isn't the information that is the problem. It is what people DO with the information. A call to harass is a crime. Exposing the truth is a virtue. Maybe you should reflect on that and stop being an ass.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakeningMeta comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#62366) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thewebofslime: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
So was everything the user @ScrubbinOutOldBlue posted. Why was he banned, and you were not?
thewebofslime ago
The repeated efforts.
theoldones ago
you still posted her private info. that's a doxx.
blah blah blah suck my dick
thewebofslime ago
It is public info. You already lost that argument repeatedly. You lack the ability to have an adult conversation. Blocked.