Like let's take this thread: https://voat.co/v/QRV/3556138 "George Soros and his family should be executed publicly." 188 upvotes.
That's more upvotes than this thread has comments in total.
Someone calls for the murder of george sorros and his family. How far does "family" go? All of his 4 sons? His daughter? His ex-wives? Grandchildren? Aunts? Nephews? Siblings? Cousins?
Isn't there a single one who could be be innocent? Would you want to get punished for the crimes of your family members? I wouldn't. What about innocent until proven guilty? I understand it's difficult with people who are so powerful they are above the law... but if someone murders his daughter and ex-wife would you cheer on it?
Again, this company argument goes both ways. Do you like the company you're keeping?
Someone calls for the murder of george sorros and his family. How far does "family" go? All of his 4 sons? His daughter? His ex-wives? Grandchildren? Aunts? Nephews? Siblings? Cousins?
Global genocide-waging criminals, profiting off war criminals, groomed to be the global genocide-waging criminals...
Tell me something. If you knew your family would become fabulously wealthy and never want for another thing in their lives, all you had to do was be a massive bad guy and be responsible for many millions of deaths, then all it would take is YOUR death to pay that price, would you do it?
Some men starve to get 50,000 bucks for their families after they die.
How do you deter that behaviour? Historically, you wipe them the fuck out.
But hey, QRV isn't mine, so nobody gives a fuck.
Again, this company argument goes both ways. Do you like the company you're keeping?
It doesn't, and you very much miss the point. The answer to why I am the way I am is in my words. I really don't care if you figure it out or not.
This doesn't justify my ban. Certainly not anymore than reddit would be justified in banning QAnon for being a terrorist threat!
My comment was nothing but two Q-quotes and a link to an older thread while noting how old those are. That's it.
And out of 170 comments in this thread you have to scroll quite far down to find an asshole trying to doxx you.
Other than that lots of insults and calling your movement a jewish psyop etc. But if I'd worry about that I wouldn't be on voat or have a username that is clearly a reference to the chans (where Q himself resides! Not exactly nice company over there!) and I don't believe you are the person who is justified getting offended over it. Over the doxx attempt yes, but certainly not the insults or jew-calling.
If you want to establish that I should take responsibility or feel ashamed for the comments of my company then arguably it follows that you are responsible for violent imagery posted in your community (like the thread I commented in) and any false flags, threats or real violence that can be attributed to the Q-community. And I'm not even a moderator with power over those people. You can't have it both ways.
My comment was nothing but two Q-quotes and a link to an older thread while noting how old those are. That's it.
Woosh.
And out of 170 comments in this thread you have to scroll quite far down to find an asshole trying to doxx you.
Woosh.
And I'm not even a moderator with power over those people.
I don't have power over people. I remove horseshit and help people that don't want to be there and participate in what the sub is meant for find the exit.
You can't have it both ways.
As suggested above, you're missing the point. Maybe some day it'll dawn on you what I'm trying to convey.
Maybe some day it'll dawn on you what I'm trying to convey.
It dawns on me that you are a giant hypocrite. One who avoided talking to me directly in this thread (I wonder why) or even attempted to justify his decision on banning me over quotes and made it very clear that he doesn't care about free speech or what Q thinks about free speech.
I don't care.
I'm certain the rest of voat cares about censorship. I believe even most of QAnons care about censorship.
""Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. " - Q
It dawns on me that you are a giant hypocrite. One who avoided talking to me directly in this thread (I wonder why)
Because you were never going to understand.
or even attempted to justify his decision on banning me over quotes and made it very clear that he doesn't care about free speech or what Q thinks about free speech.
I don't care about what you think is free speech. You don't get to dictate what Q means when he says it.
I'm certain the rest of voat cares about censorship. I believe even most of QAnons care about censorship.
Sure, censorship is bad.
""Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. " - Q
Ok, I have no problem with this.
Do you know what the right to assemble is?
Do you know what a nationalist state is?
Do you know what a subverse is?
On the other end:
Do you know what a globalist is?
Do you know what a globalist does to nationalist states?
Do you know what they do with the right to assemble for those they don't like?
Do I need to make the connection with subverses for you?
It has come to my attention that my presence here has had a silencing effect on many of the users of this sub. Many of you refused to participate in rule changes out of fear of being banned by me.
You banned me from pizzagate, then stepped down because other people were afraid to speak freely.
In the comments, multiple users seem to enjoy posts claiming to be doxxing info on me. THIS COULD VERY EASILY GET VOAT DEPLATFORMED with the absence of putt,
Putt's absence is clearly the problem, yet you blame Voat Users?
Are you struggling to fall asleep with a mosquito buzzing somewhere?
Out of curiosity are you active in v/qrv and did you deduce that I post there? Perhaps even argued with me over there? Did that influence your decision in banning me?
view the rest of the comments →
ALIENS2222 ago
https://voat.co/v/qrv/3554558 that is all
VoatsNewfag ago
I don't want to harass him in real life.
If that's even him and not just someone with a similar name.
Crensch ago
Look around the comments of your submission. Do you like the company you're keeping? I wouldn't.
This is what they do. They already doxxed one owner of /GA off the site.
Who uses these kinds of tactics?
You're welcome.
QTipping ago
You tell him Wheels! Don't take his shit.
VoatsNewfag ago
Like let's take this thread: https://voat.co/v/QRV/3556138 "George Soros and his family should be executed publicly." 188 upvotes.
That's more upvotes than this thread has comments in total.
Someone calls for the murder of george sorros and his family. How far does "family" go? All of his 4 sons? His daughter? His ex-wives? Grandchildren? Aunts? Nephews? Siblings? Cousins?
Isn't there a single one who could be be innocent? Would you want to get punished for the crimes of your family members? I wouldn't. What about innocent until proven guilty? I understand it's difficult with people who are so powerful they are above the law... but if someone murders his daughter and ex-wife would you cheer on it?
Again, this company argument goes both ways. Do you like the company you're keeping?
Crensch ago
Global genocide-waging criminals, profiting off war criminals, groomed to be the global genocide-waging criminals...
Tell me something. If you knew your family would become fabulously wealthy and never want for another thing in their lives, all you had to do was be a massive bad guy and be responsible for many millions of deaths, then all it would take is YOUR death to pay that price, would you do it?
Some men starve to get 50,000 bucks for their families after they die.
How do you deter that behaviour? Historically, you wipe them the fuck out.
But hey, QRV isn't mine, so nobody gives a fuck.
It doesn't, and you very much miss the point. The answer to why I am the way I am is in my words. I really don't care if you figure it out or not.
VoatsNewfag ago
Why bring up my company if you don't care about company?
Crensch ago
Do you read the words you type before posting them?
VoatsNewfag ago
"Do you like the company you're keeping? I wouldn't."
Crensch ago
When you figure out why my words are different than yours throwing them back at me, let me know.
VoatsNewfag ago
This doesn't justify my ban. Certainly not anymore than reddit would be justified in banning QAnon for being a terrorist threat!
My comment was nothing but two Q-quotes and a link to an older thread while noting how old those are. That's it.
And out of 170 comments in this thread you have to scroll quite far down to find an asshole trying to doxx you.
Other than that lots of insults and calling your movement a jewish psyop etc. But if I'd worry about that I wouldn't be on voat or have a username that is clearly a reference to the chans (where Q himself resides! Not exactly nice company over there!) and I don't believe you are the person who is justified getting offended over it. Over the doxx attempt yes, but certainly not the insults or jew-calling.
If you want to establish that I should take responsibility or feel ashamed for the comments of my company then arguably it follows that you are responsible for violent imagery posted in your community (like the thread I commented in) and any false flags, threats or real violence that can be attributed to the Q-community. And I'm not even a moderator with power over those people. You can't have it both ways.
Crensch ago
I don't care.
Woosh.
Woosh.
I don't have power over people. I remove horseshit and help people that don't want to be there and participate in what the sub is meant for find the exit.
As suggested above, you're missing the point. Maybe some day it'll dawn on you what I'm trying to convey.
VoatsNewfag ago
It dawns on me that you are a giant hypocrite. One who avoided talking to me directly in this thread (I wonder why) or even attempted to justify his decision on banning me over quotes and made it very clear that he doesn't care about free speech or what Q thinks about free speech.
I'm certain the rest of voat cares about censorship. I believe even most of QAnons care about censorship.
""Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. " - Q
Crensch ago
Because you were never going to understand.
I don't care about what you think is free speech. You don't get to dictate what Q means when he says it.
Sure, censorship is bad.
Ok, I have no problem with this.
Do you know what the right to assemble is?
Do you know what a nationalist state is?
Do you know what a subverse is?
On the other end:
Do you know what a globalist is?
Do you know what a globalist does to nationalist states?
Do you know what they do with the right to assemble for those they don't like?
Do I need to make the connection with subverses for you?
VoatsNewfag ago
Do you have authority in your subverse?
Crensch ago
Low effort. Try again.
VoatsNewfag ago
That's evasion on your part. Q says we shouldn't use authority to stifle free speech.
Do you have authority in your subverse? Did you use said authority to take away my ability to speak in your subverse?
Crensch ago
This seems to have hurt you deeply. Do you want to talk about it?
VoatsNewfag ago
Not as much as I will hurt the credibility of your "awakening" movement.
Crensch ago
You're the only one that seems to be having a problem. Let's talk about it.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Many people have problems with you Crensch. @voatsnewfag
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3464523/20892904
You banned me from pizzagate, then stepped down because other people were afraid to speak freely.
let's talk about it.
Crensch ago
You sound butthurt. Thank you for reminding me that you exist, and letting me read some of your gnashing of the teeth.
NOMOCHOMO ago
You're the only one that seems to be having THE problem ;)
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3556619
Crensch ago
Gnashing of teeth.
NOMOCHOMO ago
your post claiming a google search is a dox?
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3556619
Putt's absence is clearly the problem, yet you blame Voat Users?
virge ago
He banned me for having the audacity to log in. Zero participation in GA. Fancy that.
Whoever this is, it's not Crensch. I remember Crensch, and that's not him.
VoatsNewfag ago
Dude, if you had no problem with me you hadn't banned me.
And I already told you I'm no longer interested in convincing you.
Crensch ago
Why would I have problems with a swatted fly?
You've been taking about me constantly since this began. If you hadn't I'd have forgotten all about you.
VoatsNewfag ago
If this fly still annoys you it stands to reason that you suck at swatting.
Crensch ago
Swat one in your home, there are still billions outside that cant wait to announce their existence to you by buzzing all around.
Buzz buzz
VoatsNewfag ago
I told you I'm interested in convincing by bystanders and that you will feel it.
Crensch ago
Yawn.
VoatsNewfag ago
Are you struggling to fall asleep with a mosquito buzzing somewhere?
Out of curiosity are you active in v/qrv and did you deduce that I post there? Perhaps even argued with me over there? Did that influence your decision in banning me?
If so you know that I'm stubborn and relentless.
Crensch ago
Wouldn't that mean I did what I did because of that fact?
VoatsNewfag ago
To motivate me further?
Also being stubborn and relentless doesn't mean I'm wrong or did anything wrong.
m_1 ago
GO BRONCOS!!!
ALIENS2222 ago
Probably is just a similar name. Just tossing it out there for visability. More of a warning to all about how Anonymity is valuable... simple as that.