I personally agree with the ban he got on v/gaming for "spaming" the verse.

However a good number of degenerates in v/gaming defend him for the simple reason that the loli posts he does is about game characters, and they see it as related to gaming. Under that "logic" you could also spam content about franchises that inspired games like DBZ, X-men, LOTR, Power Rangers, Spider-Man, ETC... just because they have game characters and cosplay of them.

To me is simply preposterous to make that comparison of a user that has never engaged the v/gaming community about gaming topics at all . Only spammed images of degenerate content to basically have his dopamine rush, much like @Obrez showed yours multiple times.

Clearly several in the v/gaming community are ok with this nonsense, however not the majority as it clearly showed on the petition to ban him from the subverse in comparison with the other posts made to defend him. More people in the v/gaming community do not want the degenerate content u/Aged is spamming there. And the wishes for the majority to run their system verse as they want to is being trumped here by an individual that likes to discredit Voat's entire platform.

Though the evidence of u/Aged being a pedophile is merely circumstantial, his ill intentions, the nature of his postings and the frequency with what he does them are more than enough proof to me to call him out on his faggotry. Spamming random "drawings" as some like to describe them, of game characters has little to do with gaming in a whole and I honestly feel your disappointment about the v/gaming subverse allowing this trash to go on and on.

That said, the posts are considered legal as per the US laws. So I am not looking here to ban the faggot pedophile from Voat entirely, I am simply looking for him to post his trash on the subs he can post it and not in subs he wishes to attack with his "spam".

In addition, you stating that v/ProtectVoat is so weak that we are unable to do anything about this I see it as disingenuous for two reasons:

• The main goal, as I have been able to appreciate, is to denounce publicly the behaviors of users that are engaging in power moderation and vote manipulation. Obviously there are other denunciations made like for example the use of suspicious links. You seem to be disappointed that you were not able to use the subverse as a tool to attack an specific user you clearly dislike, as much as I do.

• You have been proven to lack objectivity in the past, to harass userrs in the past for the simple reason you didn't like them. You have been called out to post, without knowing so, suspicious links and you have been called out as well complaining about censorship when you have applied it yourself in your own subs. Basically you are the least credible user to complain about v/ProtectVoat. We are not a brigade team. We are simply here to publicly denounce as a service to the community so others can see what is going on and they make their minds about the whole matter.

As of the moment the ban was lifted for Aged, the only solution v/gaming has is to downvote his unproductive posts. Sadly that is the only choice the subverse has.

I am still open to a public vote by the subverse to see whether the user in question should be banned or not. That hasn't been done at all and I find it disappointing as well.