i'm learning that i am far from the only one who hates Aged. that's a spot of good news at least.
i'm learning that v/protectvoat is apparently so weak that a single proven pedophile is beyond its reach to deal with
i'm learning that many voat users are A-okay with letting this pedophile run free
i've already had one user in a private message ask me if its even worth using voat is this problem is beyond its reach. perhaps they might be right.
i'm learning that a loli-pedo can run around and shit all over everyone's fun with no self-policing response against them
i'm now aware of the fact that if i want to avoid this pedophile, i'd have to hop on to another entire social network. i wonder how much this problem exists on minds or gab...
@puttitout i am disappointed in the entire website you've created, and all who use it.
this is an elephant in the room that has gone unaddressed for so fucking long, and NO ONE HERE HAS THE BALLS TO DEAL WITH IT SEEMINGLY
pathetic. do you fucking cucks even deserve v/BloodOfEurope
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
I personally agree with the ban he got on v/gaming for "spaming" the verse.
However a good number of degenerates in v/gaming defend him for the simple reason that the loli posts he does is about game characters, and they see it as related to gaming. Under that "logic" you could also spam content about franchises that inspired games like DBZ, X-men, LOTR, Power Rangers, Spider-Man, ETC... just because they have game characters and cosplay of them.
To me is simply preposterous to make that comparison of a user that has never engaged the v/gaming community about gaming topics at all . Only spammed images of degenerate content to basically have his dopamine rush, much like @Obrez showed yours multiple times.
Clearly several in the v/gaming community are ok with this nonsense, however not the majority as it clearly showed on the petition to ban him from the subverse in comparison with the other posts made to defend him. More people in the v/gaming community do not want the degenerate content u/Aged is spamming there. And the wishes for the majority to run their system verse as they want to is being trumped here by an individual that likes to discredit Voat's entire platform.
Though the evidence of u/Aged being a pedophile is merely circumstantial, his ill intentions, the nature of his postings and the frequency with what he does them are more than enough proof to me to call him out on his faggotry. Spamming random "drawings" as some like to describe them, of game characters has little to do with gaming in a whole and I honestly feel your disappointment about the v/gaming subverse allowing this trash to go on and on.
That said, the posts are considered legal as per the US laws. So I am not looking here to ban the faggot pedophile from Voat entirely, I am simply looking for him to post his trash on the subs he can post it and not in subs he wishes to attack with his "spam".
In addition, you stating that v/ProtectVoat is so weak that we are unable to do anything about this I see it as disingenuous for two reasons:
The main goal, as I have been able to appreciate, is to denounce publicly the behaviors of users that are engaging in power moderation and vote manipulation. Obviously there are other denunciations made like for example the use of suspicious links. You seem to be disappointed that you were not able to use the subverse as a tool to attack an specific user you clearly dislike, as much as I do.
You have been proven to lack objectivity in the past, to harass userrs in the past for the simple reason you didn't like them. You have been called out to post, without knowing so, suspicious links and you have been called out as well complaining about censorship when you have applied it yourself in your own subs. Basically you are the least credible user to complain about v/ProtectVoat. We are not a brigade team. We are simply here to publicly denounce as a service to the community so others can see what is going on and they make their minds about the whole matter.
As of the moment the ban was lifted for Aged, the only solution v/gaming has is to downvote his unproductive posts. Sadly that is the only choice the subverse has.
I am still open to a public vote by the subverse to see whether the user in question should be banned or not. That hasn't been done at all and I find it disappointing as well.
Obrez ago
Theoldones made a thread asking people to vote on it, before, his alts and friends have too, the issue is it gets to the front page where the masses voat in favor without knowing any details but in the comments most users agree that aged has not broken any rules.
I've been saying this since the beginning: add a new rule to v/gaming , <low effort smut posting is a ban offense("low effort" being defined as: if you didn't make it, commission it or contribute to it's production and said content bares no significance to current events, culture or news.)
I think spamming ban requests against users should be a ban offense too. V/gaming is tired of the aged/theoldones ban demands more than they are of aged himself at this point.
I appreciate the thought that goes into your posts but from my experience in having to make and enforce rules online expanding definitions leads to a bad time, strict narrow definitions with freedom of responsible moderators and admins to make new rules using narrow definitions and terms is far less likely to lead to rule offense stretching like we see for "off topic" bans on reddit. And gives the community a formal rule or definition to complain about instead of just shouting "mod abuse".
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/gaming submission by @sguevar.
Posted automatically (#32993) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.