Logistics, how was that managed when at most they only had capacity for about a half million total?
I'm sorry, that's just not true.
You can do the math yourself.
A single crematorium (which had many furnaces) could burn 1440 corpses a day under regular load. That's already more than 1/2 million a year.
There were 5 crematorioms of various sizes - two of this size, and 3 of half the size. That's well over 2 million corpses a year, and they were in service for longer than a year.
How can 1940s tech burn 1440 people a day into ash? Did they pay aliens for space age ovens? Do you not know how long it takes a body to fully burn? Do you not know how much fuel that would take for a wartime country to import and pay for? Their supply lines were pretty shot as well. How did they achieve this?
You're bullshitting all the answers. You're just believing the fake info that supports a physical impossibility, just because a piece of paper says so.
I bet you believe the official investigation into 9/11 too. How about that totally valid Warren commission? Lol
You're purposefully misconstruing the point, shill/spook. Rub the last 2 of your half-dead brain cells together to make a neuron pathway spark enough to make a coherent thought, and maybe you'll get it. Probably not.
You can count the furnaces, you can read the manufacturer's manual. You can do the math yourself.
But you won't do any of that, because you don't want to discover you might be wrong.
They built the fifth crematorium (with a lot of furnaces) in the same place as the first 4, meaning the first 4 running at full capacity weren't enough for them.
Please, explain to me what is physically impossible about this?
I have a coherent point, your shilling or blatant ignorance couldnt be more obvious. You clearly have no clue how long bodies take to burn to ash with X amount of fuel that burns for Y amount of time to burn Z bodies per day. No fucking clue.
You clearly dont, because 45 minutes to burn a corpse in 1940s tech is a blatant, impossible lie. You're either directly shilling for authority, or too stupid to realize when you're believing obvious propaganda.
You're just assuming asinine things and making random bullshit statements, then expect me to believe your source info. That's moronic. You talk like a boomer.
They were built to prevent disease from spreading into the ground water. haahahaha. everyone in the areas used the furnaces to cremate, not just the concentration camp. Even the locals brought their dead in to burn because of the high water table in the area that prevented burial.
The fact that you cant even reiterate what I say in text accurately shows you have no love for the truth, you just care about winning an argument, most likely as a paid shill, due to the autism you spout. I guess you believe the official 9/11 story as well, as you have your nose so far up authoritarian promoted information's ass that your eyes turned brown.
Posted automatically (#35458) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Posted automatically (#35448) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Posted automatically (#35438) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Posted automatically (#35428) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Cool, now explain the the incredible amount of fuel that would have been needed to accomplish those numbers and then explain how they were able to provide and transport all of that fuel during a Total War economy.
After they had 4 crematorioms able to burn around 2500 bodies a day, they decided to build a fifth one at the same location that can burn over 700 more a day.
Why did they need that fifth one, if they couldn't get enough fuel for the first 4? Why did they need a fifth one of the first 4 were not used?
The guy above here asked you a very simple question - would you mind answer that before trying to change the subject?
I'm saying this because you're not doing your cause any favors by behaving like this. I'm all for an honest analysis of the matter but the way you're "debating" just proves you have no arguments.
In all honestly. If I were to post you a picture of a document that says "the holocaust didn't happened" signed schomo kikenberg would you say "well ok"?
I really don't know or care. I know what the jews have been up to since the end of the war, and that makes me think that the Germans had very good reasons to do what you're implying they did anyway. You know, the jew will tell you what's been done to him, but never why.
No idea why you keep hammering on those points. It has been established (and now I'm weaseling myself, but no reason not to when you clearly do not know what that is or do not care) that the above points are not a proven over and over again. There's laws that prevent people from digging further. That, plus what I said in the above paragraph, is more than enough for me to make up my mind.
It didn't happen? Well now what do we have have to cry about schlomos everytime people call you out on your subversion?
It did happen? They sure earned it, if you look at what they do today.
We can't by law question it? Oh well. That sure points in one direction but who am I to jump to conclusions.
No it hasn't. You sound like flat Earthers saying "it has been established that the Earth being a glob isn't proven over and over"
Again, no. Bring me proof if you want, but again, I think it just doesn't matter, as I spelled out above here. Please do not reply if you can't wrap your head around those simple statements above.
view the rest of the comments →
Splooge ago
Where are all the bodies?
Logistics, how was that managed when at most they only had capacity for about a half million total?
So they buried them?
Why haven't any been exhumed?
But underground radar studies have found nothing anywhere since the supposed event.
Men13 ago
I'm sorry, that's just not true.
You can do the math yourself.
A single crematorium (which had many furnaces) could burn 1440 corpses a day under regular load. That's already more than 1/2 million a year.
There were 5 crematorioms of various sizes - two of this size, and 3 of half the size. That's well over 2 million corpses a year, and they were in service for longer than a year.
You are just wrong.
Astroqualia ago
How can 1940s tech burn 1440 people a day into ash? Did they pay aliens for space age ovens? Do you not know how long it takes a body to fully burn? Do you not know how much fuel that would take for a wartime country to import and pay for? Their supply lines were pretty shot as well. How did they achieve this?
You're obviously a new shill or a fucking moron.
Men13 ago
Oh, now you are really reaching. How can 1940s tech is fire? Really?
No, they just built a lot of ovens.
Yes, I do. Do you?
Yes, I do. Do you?
Easily. Burning people is cheaper than feeding them.
Astroqualia ago
You're bullshitting all the answers. You're just believing the fake info that supports a physical impossibility, just because a piece of paper says so.
I bet you believe the official investigation into 9/11 too. How about that totally valid Warren commission? Lol
Men13 ago
I don't think this means what you think it means.
It's impossible to burn people in furnaces? What is so impossible about it?
Astroqualia ago
You're purposefully misconstruing the point, shill/spook. Rub the last 2 of your half-dead brain cells together to make a neuron pathway spark enough to make a coherent thought, and maybe you'll get it. Probably not.
Men13 ago
Because you don't have a coherent point.
You can count the furnaces, you can read the manufacturer's manual. You can do the math yourself.
But you won't do any of that, because you don't want to discover you might be wrong.
They built the fifth crematorium (with a lot of furnaces) in the same place as the first 4, meaning the first 4 running at full capacity weren't enough for them.
Please, explain to me what is physically impossible about this?
Astroqualia ago
I have a coherent point, your shilling or blatant ignorance couldnt be more obvious. You clearly have no clue how long bodies take to burn to ash with X amount of fuel that burns for Y amount of time to burn Z bodies per day. No fucking clue.
Men13 ago
I actually do know how long it takes. I've read the manufacturer's specifications for these furnaces.
45 minutes to fully burn a corpse, but you can put in a new corpse after just 25 minutes even though the old corpse is not fully burnt yet.
Also, if the corpses are smaller (like children), you can put in multiple corpses at once. That's part of the manual as well.
Now tell me, if they couldn't afford the fuel for the furnaces, why did they continue to build more crematorioms at the same place?
Astroqualia ago
You clearly dont, because 45 minutes to burn a corpse in 1940s tech is a blatant, impossible lie. You're either directly shilling for authority, or too stupid to realize when you're believing obvious propaganda.
Men13 ago
Write, you mean they didn't know how to burn things in 1930s? Fire technology wasn't evolved yet?
Burning things isn't hard. Talk about being too stupid to see propaganda, you just believe easily disprovable lies.
Just like flat Earthers. That is literally how you think.
How long do you think it took to burn a corpse in 1930?
Astroqualia ago
You're just assuming asinine things and making random bullshit statements, then expect me to believe your source info. That's moronic. You talk like a boomer.
Men13 ago
You said it's impossible. The furances exist, they were built, yet your say it's impossible to fuel them. Claiming they were built for... what, fun?
I gave you a memo from the base Commander detailing how many corpses a day were cremated in each crematorium. You don't care.
What do you have? Vague statements that's "it's impossible".
"It's impossible to have enough fuel for all the furnaces"
"It's impossible to burn corpses that fast"
You saying it doesn't make it so. Prove it. I gave proof, you gave nothing.
zxcvzxcv ago
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
They were built to prevent disease from spreading into the ground water. haahahaha. everyone in the areas used the furnaces to cremate, not just the concentration camp. Even the locals brought their dead in to burn because of the high water table in the area that prevented burial.
hahahahahahahha. maybe try reading more
Astroqualia ago
The fact that you cant even reiterate what I say in text accurately shows you have no love for the truth, you just care about winning an argument, most likely as a paid shill, due to the autism you spout. I guess you believe the official 9/11 story as well, as you have your nose so far up authoritarian promoted information's ass that your eyes turned brown.
Men13 ago
Talk talk talk. Give actual sources that support you or shut up
theoldones ago
buddy, you seem full of fuck and kike.
zxcvzxcv ago
You are correct. Kike confirmation here: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3184346
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Identitarians comment by @shadow332.
Posted automatically (#35458) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever submission by @shadow332.
Posted automatically (#35448) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/politics comment by @shadow332.
Posted automatically (#35438) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/Identitarians comment by @shadow332.
Posted automatically (#35428) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
kikeniggerfaggot ago
Enlighten us with the actual numbers/sources then. I don't, in all honesty.
Letting them starve is even cheaper
Men13 ago
No, it's really not. Starving people fight back, also you still need to dispose of the body somehow.
sparts ago
Starving people fight back but people being pitched into ovens don't? Seems legit...
Men13 ago
They weren't put in the oven alive you know...
SouthernSon ago
With all those tankers of fuel driven by pixies on mystical highways
Dr_Ed_G_ShitlordPHD ago
Cool, now explain the the incredible amount of fuel that would have been needed to accomplish those numbers and then explain how they were able to provide and transport all of that fuel during a Total War economy.
Also, where are you getting 1400 from?
Men13 ago
Cool cool.
Now you explain this to me:
After they had 4 crematorioms able to burn around 2500 bodies a day, they decided to build a fifth one at the same location that can burn over 700 more a day.
Why did they need that fifth one, if they couldn't get enough fuel for the first 4? Why did they need a fifth one of the first 4 were not used?
Dr_Ed_G_ShitlordPHD ago
So just to clarify, you can't answer my question and instead you provide an unverified document as proof of your original claim?
Men13 ago
Your question was where I got the 1400 number from. I answered that question.
You didn't answer why the Nazis would build a fifth crematorium, with a lot of new furnace, if they couldn't afford the fuel for the first 4.
What makes you think it took that much fuel to run? Compared to feeding millions of prisoners that is.
That document isn't all the proof. The furnaces still exist, you can see them yourself. You can count them.
There's also the manufacturer instructions, which includes how often you can put in a new corpse. The numbers match this document.
Your only rebuttal is "lol I know nothing about was, but obviously this world be to d expensive to run lol". Then why did they build it?
kikeniggerfaggot ago
The guy above here asked you a very simple question - would you mind answer that before trying to change the subject?
I'm saying this because you're not doing your cause any favors by behaving like this. I'm all for an honest analysis of the matter but the way you're "debating" just proves you have no arguments.
Men13 ago
Oh, sorry - I forgot to link to that.
It's from the German's own calculations - see the official letter here: https://i.imgtc.com/aACquuM.jpg
Note that these numbers INCLUDE time for cleaning an maintenance.
kikeniggerfaggot ago
That is really what you consider to be proof?
In all honestly. If I were to post you a picture of a document that says "the holocaust didn't happened" signed schomo kikenberg would you say "well ok"?
Men13 ago
That's not all the proof. The furnaces still exist - you can count them yourself.
There's the manufacturers instructions about maintenance and how long you should wait between bodies.
You can do the math yourself and get the same results.
There's testimony of German soldiers who worked there
There's a lot of evidence of this. But I suspect you wouldn't accept any evidence at all.
In your heart you know this is true - your just saving face because you really want there to be a conspiracy.
kikeniggerfaggot ago
I really don't know or care. I know what the jews have been up to since the end of the war, and that makes me think that the Germans had very good reasons to do what you're implying they did anyway. You know, the jew will tell you what's been done to him, but never why.
No idea why you keep hammering on those points. It has been established (and now I'm weaseling myself, but no reason not to when you clearly do not know what that is or do not care) that the above points are not a proven over and over again. There's laws that prevent people from digging further. That, plus what I said in the above paragraph, is more than enough for me to make up my mind.
Men13 ago
No it hasn't. You sound like flat Earthers saying "it has been established that the Earth being a glob isn't proven over and over"
And just like flat Earthers - just saying it doesn't make it true.
This happened. Get over it.
You said nothing in the above paragraph. But it's fitting, because you don't need anything to believe what you want to believe.
There's proof. There's a LOT of proof. You just don't care. Because reality doesn't matter to you.
kikeniggerfaggot ago
Let me spell that out for you again
It didn't happen? Well now what do we have have to cry about schlomos everytime people call you out on your subversion?
It did happen? They sure earned it, if you look at what they do today.
We can't by law question it? Oh well. That sure points in one direction but who am I to jump to conclusions.
Again, no. Bring me proof if you want, but again, I think it just doesn't matter, as I spelled out above here. Please do not reply if you can't wrap your head around those simple statements above.
gentronseven ago
Out of his ass since he made it up.