I agree that his reasoning is illogical for Voat was fine before QVR came here. So his premise is false to say the least but what proof do you have of this accusation you are making. I am interested.
He is known for having 30+ alts including this one due to his beef with IronFist.
Well you guys are older than me here at voat you would know about that. But i wouldn't.
He used to run and moderate one of the biggest gore subverses back on reddit before his main there was banned.
I didn't know that background story, did he make an introduction when he arrived at voat about the subject? Or did he attempt to create a sub for the same purpose? I am just trying to get something concrete that can use to make my mind out of it.
Where else would you obtain such a high number of so specific gore pics of decent resolution. Its easy to find 30 gore pics, but its usually people. You have to be quite an enthusiast to fund so many that are gore+animal+cute animal+hi res.
Seems logical yet circumstantial.
Just after i said it here, with a ping to fresh, but without pinging the vHtF account, 2 more aww posts have poped up.
Still circumstantial but I guess I will have to take your word for it. Don't get me wrong, I know you guys tend to go full throttle to defend Voat of whatever comes to threaten the community. I respect that, but this is hardly hard proof. Specially for people that are not familiarized with the same background you guys have. So I will have to reserve my judgement on this.
He didn't answered my question of what did he mean by saying that he has talked with other site owners and find that something here at voat is fishy.
Begs to question how is someone this sick (with the gore sub he used to have and the continuous gore posts here at v/aww)going to say that something fishy is going on here at voat? Wouldn't he be happy that something wrong was going on so he could thrive out of it?
Not trying to put a reasonable doubt on the guy, I for starts don't trust him because he wouldn't answer the question in the first place. A simple and straight forward question. Evasion usually goes hand by hand with lies. So there is that. But the accusation you gave seems to be just based on your personal believe. Which again, I respect, but have to reserve my judgement on it.
For example when I accused @NoRoyalty of been a (((jew in the letter))) that tries to gain favour in this community is because I have proof of what he has posted: https://voat.co/v/politics/2875827 ----> I have taken a screenshot of it just in case he decides to delete it afterwards.
This is why I need proof. I may not like the guy either (right now just because he didn't answer the question at all and if he does I am sure he will be dismissive) but I have proof of that. I don't have proof of the gore posting, so I can't follow up there.
Posted automatically (#12790) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
I didn't see those threads so you are accusing me of being stupid out of an assumption that you are jumping on but I believe I have quoted this to you before you changed names here at Voat:
Proverbs 26:4 King James Version
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Why am i be mentioned with this? Im just a shit poster. Dont make it into more than it is. I don't have anything to do with this other crap you're talking about.
I didn't say you did, another assumption you jumped out of mere lack of logical thinking. I used you as an example to what I was arguing: I need proof to be able to state my position on a matter. If it is not of God (though He has given me many proofs) I will not trust it blindly.
view the rest of the comments →
WalkWithElias ago
Freshmeat jacks off to gore.
ExpertShitposter ago
@freshmeat is actually the gore poster in v/aww, he is the voathatesthefist account
https://voat.co/u/voatHatesTheFirst/submissions
sguevar ago
Got any proof of this?
I agree that his reasoning is illogical for Voat was fine before QVR came here. So his premise is false to say the least but what proof do you have of this accusation you are making. I am interested.
ExpertShitposter ago
Just after i said it here, with a ping to fresh, but without pinging the vHtF account, 2 more aww posts have poped up.
sguevar ago
Well you guys are older than me here at voat you would know about that. But i wouldn't.
I didn't know that background story, did he make an introduction when he arrived at voat about the subject? Or did he attempt to create a sub for the same purpose? I am just trying to get something concrete that can use to make my mind out of it.
Seems logical yet circumstantial.
Still circumstantial but I guess I will have to take your word for it. Don't get me wrong, I know you guys tend to go full throttle to defend Voat of whatever comes to threaten the community. I respect that, but this is hardly hard proof. Specially for people that are not familiarized with the same background you guys have. So I will have to reserve my judgement on this.
He didn't answered my question of what did he mean by saying that he has talked with other site owners and find that something here at voat is fishy.
Begs to question how is someone this sick (with the gore sub he used to have and the continuous gore posts here at v/aww)going to say that something fishy is going on here at voat? Wouldn't he be happy that something wrong was going on so he could thrive out of it?
Not trying to put a reasonable doubt on the guy, I for starts don't trust him because he wouldn't answer the question in the first place. A simple and straight forward question. Evasion usually goes hand by hand with lies. So there is that. But the accusation you gave seems to be just based on your personal believe. Which again, I respect, but have to reserve my judgement on it.
For example when I accused @NoRoyalty of been a (((jew in the letter))) that tries to gain favour in this community is because I have proof of what he has posted: https://voat.co/v/politics/2875827 ----> I have taken a screenshot of it just in case he decides to delete it afterwards.
And why I say he tries to gain favour of the community, because of this: https://voat.co/v/whatever/2877877.
Or when I expressed my suspicion to @Ghostskin that he was in fact @TheAmerican (i first confused with TrueAmerican but he was the one who corrected) and he confessed of it here: https://voat.co/v/whatever/2873776/15238465/10#15238465
This is why I need proof. I may not like the guy either (right now just because he didn't answer the question at all and if he does I am sure he will be dismissive) but I have proof of that. I don't have proof of the gore posting, so I can't follow up there.
MadWorld ago
I am assuming that you know who SaneGoatiSwear is. Here is something to get you started down the rabbit hole:
I don't know if that is worth your time, but good luck!
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#12790) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
sguevar ago
Just took a look on all the matter, the main thing I got is that Putt confirms that @freshmeat is sanegoat, so that is something I can cling on.
Thanks for the extra information.
sguevar ago
Appreciated I will look into it, give you my word.
GhostSkin ago
Oh, and moron. I've made the Reds with the title to saying that I was @TheAmerican. You're not Sherlock Holmes. You're pretty stupid actually.
sguevar ago
I didn't see those threads so you are accusing me of being stupid out of an assumption that you are jumping on but I believe I have quoted this to you before you changed names here at Voat:
Proverbs 26:4 King James Version
GhostSkin ago
You can just give me the proverb I have the Bible memorized
GhostSkin ago
Why am i be mentioned with this? Im just a shit poster. Dont make it into more than it is. I don't have anything to do with this other crap you're talking about.
sguevar ago
I didn't say you did, another assumption you jumped out of mere lack of logical thinking. I used you as an example to what I was arguing: I need proof to be able to state my position on a matter. If it is not of God (though He has given me many proofs) I will not trust it blindly.
GhostSkin ago
I couldn't even understand what you were trying to say to be honest