You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BirthTheGirth ago

Confusing. So Voat is anti-Trump now? Considering Trump has been proven to be on the Q team

BackAsswards ago

A vague coincidence is not proof.

playswithsquirrelz ago

Have you researched Q at all? There's 0 doubt Q and team work directly with Trump. If you're anti-all-things-Trump then fine; but there's no getting around the fact that Q is essentially Trump's guerrilla info team. You can call it Trump directed propaganda if you'd like.

One recent proof that I don't believe could be explained away: Anons ask Q for a 0 delta Trump tweet/Q drop. It is delivered within an hour or 2. - https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2712365

Vague coincidence?

This is one of the most convincing proofs. Many more out there. Also lots of weak proofs that I personally think are just Q-tards grasping at straws, but I suppose when considering all these as a whole then it amounts to something.

I can't make you believe in Q, Trump, et al, but I do strongly suggest you research it yourself - tons of important info is given out. Shit is gonna go down soon and researching Q drops will help all prepare and to not be shell shocked.

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

right a vague coincidence is not proof. Hence we didn't say vague coincidence we said proof. It's proof that comes in the format that the MSM cannot touch, because to do so would make them sound like "Conspiracy Theorist" remember... critical thinking and analysis that uncovers organized effort for a cause is a "Conspiracy Theory" and such has been set up in the normie conscious to be dismissed out of hand. This is how Q is "sticking to the enemy" as in martial arts. If one enters into the light, they both enter into the light and the evil that cannot stand the light will be destroyed by it.

BirthTheGirth ago

Being on AF1 as it flies over NK is not vague

Tzitzimitl ago

it proves only that this q person or group is or was high enough to get on AF1 once; the questions of intent and motive are indeed vague.

BirthTheGirth ago

So stating James Baker, Bruce Ohr, and Lisa Page were cooperating witnesses months before it was released publicly is vague?

Tzitzimitl ago

again, youve got rank but ignore motive and intent

BirthTheGirth ago

Um what? You keep using vague. The only thing vague so far are the dates in which the posts actually take place

Tzitzimitl ago

im noticing something else thats vague here - the thing that supposedly exists between your ears

BirthTheGirth ago

Like the vagueness between your legs? What does rank and such have to do with you saying the posts were vague? How much is Soros paying your kike ass?

Tzitzimitl ago

oh sweetie its okay dont strain yourself

thisistotallynotme ago

Sweetie

Another chick from GCHQ's internet forum task force. They never hire men.

Orfion ago

That was Trumps picture. Where is the proof Q was on that flight.

x13 ago

No one said Q took the picture, but Q goddamned for certain had the photo and posted it. Mountain ranges were located by the weaponized autists. It was also way way ahead of the later MSM NK discussion buzz.

Orfion ago

The picture was tweeted by Trump. Every one had the picture.

Humansized ago

I cant take qews seriously. Maybe if they didnt act like deranged cultists worshipping this q like a god.

playswithsquirrelz ago

Yea a lot of the community is really.... brutal... but that doesn't discredit Q and the info he shares. Interesting shit worth researching IMHO