dontforgetaboutevil ago

I don't have any alts faggot.

dontforgetaboutevil ago

It would be more honest than having a string of alts like you and your buddies.

Crensch ago

And that right there is my main weakness. I've no idea what users post like other users. No idea why, but I just cannot keep a writing-style profile in my head to compare against other usernames.

This kind of info really really helps me!

dontforgetaboutevil ago

Oh look its crenschs bottom bitch.

dontforgetaboutevil ago

Crensch most of what you post is such horseshit you sill go hours until someone fucked up enough comes along and upvotes any of your shit. Sane people dont have that same problem.

Crensch ago

Oh, and this makes it all the more hilarious. You just have an axe to grind against @kevdude, and voat as a whole.

All the voat-haters really coming out of the woodwork to defend this faggot.

Archives in order:

http://archive.is/BdSce

http://archive.is/0RcBA

http://archive.is/O5cpB

@Trigglypuff @xenoPsychologist @jewshekelstein1488

Come on guys... is this not getting a bit ridiculous? These voat-hating usernames that nobody knows coming out to defend this guy? Is this just some epic troll I'm not seeing, or does this appear to be legit(so to speak)?

Crensch ago

It's also pretty telling that you don't actually refute any of my points, just attack me as a person.

You're really quite pathetic.

Crensch ago

Sounds like the treatment of the 'tinfoil hat conspiracy nutters' before the last couple of years. I dig around, find information, archive, catalog, and put it together for others to see. I don't stop until I'm satisfied, yet that somehow seems to offend you enough to label me insane.

Your response is really quite amusing.

Crensch ago

@kevdude @disappointed @Trigglypuff @xenoPsychologist @jewshekelstein1488

Pinging y'all because I think this is horseshit, and I think the kikes on this site are in damage control mode pretty hardcore.

Let me know what you think.

Talc ago

my opinion, I'd be prepared to bet real money that its vote manipulation. Been studying spam and vote manipulation here since 2014 under this username and 2 previous ones, never seen an organic voting pattern look anything like this one.

regardless of who is in the right, who is in the wrong, who is a commie, faggot, or kike, vote manipulation is bad for the whole site and should be stamped out.

Disappointed ago

I'm gonna have to catch up on what this is all about but there's no doubt there are some big alt problems on Voat and I'm not even sure what the answer is beyond moving away from votes and giving users total control of what they see and how.

Crensch ago

If enough of us find it suspicious, one of us can let putt know. I'm not going to do it unless many users agree that it looks fucky.

xenoPsychologist ago

i cant say its DEFINITELY not organic, but it does look pretty suspicious. in my experience, the standard voat style drama posts between users dont usually get much in the way of votes. something to keep an eye on, i think. wouldnt get my jimmies too rustled YET.

theres still a chance hes just an arsehole with different opinions (which is a fine thing to be).

Crensch ago

I'd be quite happy if there was a plausible explanation for all of this. Many users I like happened to like MP and were saddened by what they were seeing when reading our posts. He really looks like a Jew, and they were unhappy to admit that.

By all means, if it's nothing and I'm just being a rabid dog about it, let me know.

Artofchoke ago

I respect and admire your willingness to listen to facts, always. You have integrity.

xenoPsychologist ago

he seemed fairly reasonable to me for quite a while. so, ill file this under maybe.

Crensch ago

I appreciate your candor.

xenoPsychologist ago

you are pretty enthusiastic when it comes to finding the enemy among us.

i tend to err on the side of "keep watching, they cant remain ambiguous forever. eventually the enemy tips his hand."

Crensch ago

I enjoy this kind of thing, and I'm pretty good at it. I can understand the wait and see philosophy, but I find myself unable to let things go once they start looking fucky.

Time kinda stands still for me as I'm digging, cataloging, archiving, linking, formatting, and presenting my findings.

xenoPsychologist ago

until fairly recently i wasnt entirely sure about the jew shill stuff. but then i encountered one who, in the course of the disagreement, says "no wonder we ashkenazim control a population 50x our size". at which point, "oh snap, it really is true" and "i got one to admit it" both go through my mind.

so, what you do seems... how to best say... its unfortunate that it is necessary, but it is indeed necessary.

middle_path ago

Prove to me it's been manipulated. Seriously. All you have is speculation because it was generated organically. A lot of people don't like you. I made a post calling out your tactics and now you're feeling weird that the light has been shined on you.

But honestly - find a way to prove what you are claiming. You won't be able to, because it's pure conjecture. Get Putt involved and let's see who's right. This is clearly a very big issue for you.

Talc ago

why don't you "prove" it's not manipulated, link to some other posts which exceeded 1.88 votes/min for over 1/4 hour.

the only person who can really prove anything either way is the person with access to the server logs. Nothing anyone else offers here is actual proof, just evidence, assumption, or assertion. A good pile of evidence is pretty close to proof however, so give it a go!

Crensch ago

Thanks for the math, and good point!

middle_path ago

You said yourself that no one can prove this unless they have access to server logs.

I'm not the one making the claim, I have nothing to prove. Why don't you prove your submissions aren't be manipulated?

Talc ago

did you even try thinking before you typed that?

You said yourself that no one can prove this unless they have access to server logs

yes, that's what I said. All anyone can do is build a mountain of anecdotal evidence that someone is manipulating votes, only server logs can provide canonical evidence.

Why don't you prove your submissions aren't be manipulated?

I said that no-one can prove this unless they have access to the server logs. You acknowledged that I had said this. One line of typing later your weak mind appears to have forgotten this important fact. Is this intellectual paucity your normal standard of discourse or have you taken some mind-altering substance?

All "we" can do is gather anecdotal evidence that votes appear to be manipulated. Voting patterns on certain posts are very different to normal organic voting on the site.

If this were my site I would have published the server logs as soon as this started. (if this were my site quite a few things would be different on the abuse handling side of things, because that's what I do for a living and I would apply everything I've learned in almost 20 years of abuse desk, but it's not my site and its owners have a different viewpoint, it's their site and they get to decide how it should run.)

it also occurs to me that a malicious 3rd party could cause loads of infighting by carefully targetting users with a botnet, find an existing argument and downvote the crap out of one side, who will naturally blame the other side for the downvotes. could also be done with upvotes, or a mixture of both. There's plenty of precedent for this sort of behaviour on uncensored forums, it's not so far different to the "usenet performance art" of the 1990s.

I am keeping as much of an open mind as I can, I'm saying what I see which is blatantly unnatural voting patterns, I'm not saying who is doing the voting because I can't see that. I can only see who appears to gain and who appears to lose.

Crensch ago

Prove to me it's been manipulated. Seriously. All you have is speculation because it was generated organically.

That's not exactly how things work on forums, faggot.

A lot of people don't like you. I made a post calling out your tactics and now you're feeling weird that the light has been shined on you.

I don't really care if people don't like me, and I'm happy to have the light shined on me. Cool, call out my bullshit. Show me where I'm wrong.

All you've done is make me more and more sure that you're a fucking kike, or at the very least taking shekels to subvert this place. I bet you're the high-paid shill if that is indeed your situation.

But honestly - find a way to prove what you are claiming.

I just archived it because I find it suspicious as fuck. I don't really give a shit what you think, and I'm pretty sure voaters will tell me what they think.

You won't be able to, because it's pure conjecture. Get Putt involved and let's see who's right. This is clearly a very big issue for you.

Unlike you Jews, I don't call for Putt every time a Jew pulls his Jewish bullshit. I'll do my digging, and present my findings to the court of Voat.

And if I think there's been some shill-damage-control bullshit going on, I'll continue digging until I'm satisfied that it's not.

middle_path ago

So you have no proof? Cool, exactly what I thought.

Crensch ago

Every single time I make a submission about you, it gets downvoted exactly as much as it's upvoated for the first hour. I'm not the only one that notices this.

middle_path ago

I noticed that too, actually. It is weird. Not my doing, but strange.

RimeTheBard ago

thinking the goyim don't know

SickOfNiggers ago

You are such a blatant habara shill if anything jewish related comes on here you try to shut it down and then start new posts so that you and your friends can regain the karma you got after being down voated for being a shit stain.

Same things you jews do on reddit. SOP.

middle_path ago

2 day old account

Every.Fucking.Time.

SickOfNiggers ago

Are you denying the fact that you are a jew shill who posts politically correct karma farming in order to up voat your friends and down voat your detractors?

middle_path ago

Are you denying the fact that you are a jew shill who posts politically correct karma farming in order to up voat your friends and down voat your detractors?

Yes, I am denying that loaded question.

Crensch ago

@SickOfNiggers that means he's either denying that he's a kike, or that he's a shill. That or he's trying to play a semantic kike game about the definition of "politically" or "correct" or "karma" or "farming" or "friends" or "detractors"

@middle_path this won't go away as long as shit looks suspicious, and unlike on the other website, you can't hide suspicious shit here.