The proof is on the devs side and only they can access it, which they have cooperated with law enforcement on this issue. Atko has been under a gag order for some time now which is why he left, and PuttItOut clearly isn't the same person who started that account.

More claims, zero evidence. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed, just as easily.

Typical SRS faggot argument. Trying to establish an "in" group and any possible chance of meta discussion outside of that group's control is clearly a threat and must be labeled as "not part of the community" when in fact i've been here and contributed far more than your faggot ass. Back when this site used to get 5-8k views on my original account's posts.

In other words, you openly admit you use alts to make baseless claims against other Voat Goats' character. Further, without evidence of who your main is, your claim of "contributed more than you" is baseless bullshit. We can claim we are whomever we want to be on the Internet. What we claim to be doesn't matter, only what we can back up with evidence (Screencaps, Archives, etc.), analytics (CCP/SCP, Alexa rankings, etc.), or other solid proof.

It's objective lurkers I care for.

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you seem to think it means. Anyone who is truly objective is going to do as I have, and ask where the proof is, instead of taking an ad hominem fallacy at face value from a self-admitted Character-Assassination Alt.

You have already made it clear you are just a virtue signaler if you can't even approach my claims intellectually honestly...

Yet another phrase you seem to spout off like some deranged Leftist without knowing the definition of. Lots of projection in this post you've made here, but how odd that the very thing you accuse me of not doing (Intellectual honesty) is the very thing I have done (Insisting on seeing the evidence and pointing out fallacies and personal attacks) whilst you do the very thing you accuse others of.

you defend Empress of all people.

I didn't defend anybody. I simply said it's rotten to accuse other of heinous crimes behind their backs (AKA accuse someone of pedophilia in a thread without tagging them) and then insisted on seeing the evidence said person supposedly has, to back up their claim. Do you disagree that attacking someone's character through gossip and baseless (AKA lacking evidence) claims is an unethical thing to do? Of course, that question is rhetorical, because I know you're not actually going to answer it, you're just going to deflect and make more baseless claims.

Because I've never said anything that isn't very easily a possiblity. I'm just here to tell the truth.

No you're not, and the proof is in how those two statements contradict each other. Because, you see, if something actually happened (AKA It's 'The Truth'), there will be evidence it actually happened. Meanwhile, you focus on vagaries and 'what is possible', as your defense when someone calls you out for not providing evidence of what you claim. If what you claim is true ("Empress is a tranny pedo faggot.") is actually true, then you would have evidence of that claim and would provide it immediately on request to bolster your case. Instead, when called out on your bullshit, you fall back to "It's entirely possible..."

You're here as a manipulator, plain and simple and your constant weasel words and vague language, as well as refusal to provide any evidence to back your claims whatsoever proves it. Go fuck yourself up the ass with a red-hot poker, and have a nice day, faggot.