I am late but hell yes I agree!

Agree, @VieBlue, with all that you said and your choice of Vindicator. Would like to see this sub evolve and become more credible.

I am relatively new to pizzagate whatever, normally posting to pizzagate until I was banned by Millennial Falcon (MF) 4 days ago for spam after being a loyal member and poster for 6 months. I feel the need to explain my story to somebody, and I am sure this isn't the right place, but after 4 separate and detailed private messages pleading my case to pizzagate mods since banned, I have heard nothing and feel puzzled, confused, and not sure what to think about anything related to the pizzagate sub.

"Not over it," for 2 reasons, the 1st one being completely innocent as to the meaning of spam as it relates to pizzagate. A mod explained after I was banned that it meant I reposted after MF deleted my post. MF's reason was Rule #1, speculation, providing 1 short sentence to back it up. I immediately delved into new research, knowing that my prior post, even with my input and 4 credible links, had to be strengthened to suit MF's claim. I reposted with 3 additional links along with additional input and further explanation to disavow the "speculation" theory. I worked hard on this post and believed in it 100%. After reposting, MF sent me the message that I was banned from pizzagate with a ":("

My defense plea is that it was not a repost of the initial post and questioned as to whether or not MF even read the repost that contained a lot more additional info. To date, I have heard nothing, nada. If the mods still want me banned, so be it. I'll immediately be over it, but for that to occur, it is only fair and just that I receive a response to my plea.

Anyway, I posted the exact same article 2 days ago on this sub that remains under "Hot," the post discusses puberty blocker hormones, a topic that bears watching, and the possibility and potential of it benefitting pedophiles, sex trafficking, and the fact that it has been labeled as child abuse by pediatricians.

@RedGreenAlliance

sorry for the late ping - have pinged 200+ five at a time, ping anyone you wish -- thx

I vote for vindicator

I am inviting @3141592653 to join in our new sub Always stands up for our children and the Corrupt Crimes of the Elite on the American People. A Valiant Fighter.

I would like to add the name of @fogdryer We have all read his most enlightening posts on Racine Wi. He will be a most wonderful asset to our new sub.

lovely @UnicornAndSparkles the party doesn't really happen until you are here (and vote, opinionate, etc).

It took me a while to build up 100CCP, but I don't even make posts here. I'm a lurker for the my part. I always try to upvoat the posts that make the most sense so they don't fall too deeply down the page. I'm all for the 100CCP, and while I have noticed a bunch of freggin nonsense going around lately, I wasn't aware it'd been reversed. As far as ownership goes, I'm not in an informed enough position to comment on this. However, not knowing who the mods are is a bit sketchy. I do hope this gets worked out. I was a lurker over at reddit and jumped ship when voat got started up. I've seen the shills flooding in and it has felt like only a matter of time before this places is overrun again. LOL I read somewhere in the comments about Zerg rushing. - That's pretty much what it seemed like when reddit when down. I'd hate to see that happen here. Voat is the first and last place I visit every night. It keeps my fires burning to know I'm not alone in how I have felt about this world; the things I have seen. And there is a possibility for justice as long as people are fighting. For this, 100CCP is certainly not too much to ask. People complaining about it should just suck it up and start commenting and upvoating the people who are clearly in the trenches on this thing.A CCP reset? - Perhaps that's fine and fair. However, It seems like it would spark a race to dominate the boards. If you start such a situation, you'd better have a plan to win it. It seems the shills never sleep. Keep fighting the good fight.

I support all of those ideas!

Sorry for late reply. I agree with and support your proposals.

yes--- agreed to 100 point reinstatement. and yes, for Vindicator... absent landlords are of little use. as for the rest, i have limited understanding of the technical side of things, thanks to those that do!!

I agree with reinstating 100 ccp rule, and Vindicator gets my vote for sun owner

i don't submit a lot so i'm not actually versed in what the hinderances have been for people. my only thought is perhaps someone has big information and needs a quick burner account or is someone like an insider who doesn't use forums much and needs to share some info, they'd have trouble getting thru. but the likelihood of that vs. the high volumes of bullshit posts from shills lately might convince me.

Don't get discouraged by all the bullshit. This feed here can fill up pretty fast with hate speech and disinformation but there are still a lot of people out there doing the work to stop corruption and child abuse. This video is a great update on pizzagate/pedogate research. Honeybee and liberty columnist on Victurus Libertas talking about EVERYTHING that we are talking about here. Honeybee and liberty columnist are working on a documentary. Honeybee reveals Emma's identity. They talk about swordfish. And a lot more! Lets keep it up folks. We're almost there. Stay focused on helping the kids. This isn't political. This is about the kids.

A moderator of the Pizzagate subverse should have a Honeybee type mentality. At the current time the Pizzagate subverse has someting so alien to this type of mentality operating the mod controls (Falcon) that it is grinding the subverse slowly to pieces.

The disturbing component of this is the fact that Mil Falcon has demonstrated that he is not here for the good of the subverse and it's mission, but is here because he considers this subverse his own personal universe to do with as he pleases.

Falcon has demonstrated that the preferences of the voaters is of minor importance in comparison to his desire to be the Boss King of the pizzagate subverse.

This cannot be denied as he is banning posters who express their discontent with his moderation policies. He has made no attempt to openly and publicly discuss the subverse problems with voaters. Instead he sits behind the mod buttons like a king in an ivory tower wielding the mod controls in a dictatorial fashion.

This ability to mod this subverse has become more of an object of power for Falcon than a desire to do what is right and best for the mission of the subverse. The quality of the material that is allowed to exist in the subverse has been greatly eroded as a result.

Sure Falcon gets rid of obvious off topic trash, but at his sole discretion, Falcon throws out very much on topic, relevant, and important subject matter. Falcon disregards and enforces the posting rules at his discretion according to his personal preferences and not on accordance with the rules themselves or the desires of the voaters that make this subverse what it is.

Without the posting Voaters Falcon would have no mini universe to lord over. This situation is EXACTLY the same as the way the United States is run by it's government. Voaters have no real say in how things are run. Voaters, for lack of a better phrase "do as they are told or else."

This subverse, for all practical purposes, has been subverted, and diverted onto the rails of the ego of one person who has demonstrated unequivocally that he cares only for his own perspectives. A tyrant.

This topic of discussion will NEVER be free to operate and function in accordance with the mission until this subverse is either operating without Falcon or moves to a venu that is moderated by people that are here for the mission and not their own ego. I do not think this can be denied.

Falcon has demonstrated that he is more than willing to hold on to control of this subverse no matter how many people have to be banned or how destructive it is to the subverse. Falcon is so obsessed by remaining in control of this subverse that he is willing to ride it all the way into the ground because he knows nobody can get to the mod controls and remove him from the Ivory Tower.

The honorable thing to do would be to step down from the mod position for the good of the subverse and it's mission. Apparently that is not going to happen.

Agreed, you have my vote.

Minimum CCP to downvoat - but not necessarily to make submissions - must be returned to 100. Who changed this rule? By all means give Vindicator ownership. MF needs to look beyond petty infringements of rules and consider who benefits the subverse (2impendingdoom and Dathmath) and who doesn't (DonKeyote and Equinelover) before arbitrarily banning users.

Yes! @ Carmencita is an example for us all!

@gothamgirl @Atticus182 @enditnow @4warned

@pby1000 @dksogo158 @DantePerez2017 @The28th @ChangingPerspectives

@star_boi @gumshoe @zeropointnow @whitehand @DrainTheSwamp1776

I support :)

Way to go VieBleu! Thank you for initiating this really importantant conversation. I'm with you!

Aye from me on both motions. But what, pray tell, is a "ping"?

I hear you. at this time I did not include a rules change regarding this issue. I think it is how the rules are being implemented that is the main problem. I suggest you start a subverse on PizzagateEsoteric. I think your approach to the topic is interesting, and it could have its own subverse that could be put on the sidebar, but I agree that because it is not evidence based per se, it does not belong on the main sub. For example, the weak link in your post is that CERN is known to have had occult rituals.. That may or may not be true (some video indications, but not proof - it could have been a joke, larp, trolling, etc) and even if it were true, a random occult ritual at CERN does not prove a link to your other arguments

Thanks for commenting i'm sorry I couldn't be of more use to you.

Support.

yes yes yes

I'm here and with VB - they are everywhere, we are facing a full blown shill onslaught.

They are like fucking locusts - screeching their bullshit at us, reporting, down-voting, and crafting their paper thin divisive narratives.

We need to bring back 100CCP before this place gets zerg rushed.

WE CANNOT LOSE VOAT.

This place is our last bastion. This is the Alamo. Helms Deep. This is the last line of defense. If we lose this ground, we lose the war. There is no place else to retreat to from here.

The line must be drawn - and you have my full support in taking whatever moves are necessary to protect it. @Viebleu

In addition to the changes - I recommend we sticky a permanent "How to Spot Shills" post - along with the leaked psyop tactics document we obtained earlier in the month. New users need to know how to avoid upvoating them and how to spot and filter their trash.

I support these changes, VieBleu. Also, I support the reinstatement of DarkMath. I have never understood why DarkMath was ever called a shill. True, I am not here very often anymore so don't follow the drama, but DarkMath has always been an original thinker and I believe sincere even though I don't always agree with him/her. However, I am always interested in what DarkMath writes.

Yeah it shouldn't be one persons choice that is known to pick on others

Hey fam...checking in from shitposting at T_D. Thanks for the ping, and I agree with the 100 SCC rule...after being active here and on T_D and lurking /pol/, I can definitively say this place gets shilled hard. But, go figure, pizzagate is what they don't want investigated...

yep

Yes for the CCP. It seems like at key breaking news moments forum posts start getting nuked. It's like people lurk and wait till something breaks then downvoat all related context.

Big yesfor #1

It's an outrage they even took away the 100 ccp requirement to downvoat, that's a great way to keep things from being too easy for those with malicious intent. However, I believe anybody that's not banned should be able to submit or comment. Also I am cool with Vindicator so that's all well.

What I would really like to see is a new option on the Report button to flag posts as being non PG-related as per the sidebar rules. That way, mindless posts about pizza pictures and spiral logos that go nowhere can be removed from the sub, with a suggestion to take them to v/pizzagatewhatever. We have to have standards for content and everybody should have a chance to let their voice be heard, but not everything should be allowed especially when it offers no well thought out value or its too abstract or unrelated. For example, not every prostitution or pimping arrest is pizzagate related.

I think people really stretch the definition of what's directly related and we shouldn't let it water down the front page, thus the report option that will help mods clean it up and focus on the good content.

I can support 100 points before downvoting. That is how it was when I started and it really didn't seem too difficult to get the 100 points if you had an interest in pizzagate.

I don't have a strong feeling one way or another on ownership. I think Vindicator would be a good choice, though. And like you said, give it a try. I am all for reinstating @2impendingdoom and @DarkMath.

P.S. Do you or does anybody know if drainingswamps was banned too. As far as I can tell, they have been silent since release of last pizzagate cards. I am concerned they may be feeling some heat over them .

Why don't those of us here who give a shit start our own? @VieBleu can be the owner. I'd say just use this now that we all know we're here, but I'm not sure what the owner/mod situation is. This could work. I get wanting it out in the open for others to find/join, but not at the expense of investigating/sharing info. Maybe the regular pg sub can be used for more vetted topics, ones we vet here?

:))

Yup. I'm like that until I get royally pissed

I was pinged by @2impendingdoom.

Given the current situation going on, I would support the 100 CCP point rule. I do think Vindicator's initial ruling in getting rid of it is theoretically correct. It was one of the things I liked about the forum and subverse. I joined and posted pretty much immediately. It's the way it should be, but not when new accounts are being used to spam the forum with junk posts that push valid ones into oblivion, and that seems to be the tactic being used -- and effectively.

As for subverse ownership, don't know. MF is very inconsistent in post deletions, but don't see it as being maliciously done. I've had more positive reactions with Vindicator so I would more apt to support that move, but then again, I haven't had any bad ones with MF. Well, other than posts that are relevant to pizzagate getting deleted for no particular reason. Could just be he's overwhelmed by the massive amount of junk posts. Don't have strong feelings on this one.

On the subject of banning, yes, I would like to see 2impendingdoom reinstated. I didn't even know posting links to deleted submissions was a bannable offense. I mean, people can open up the link and view them. My interactions with 2impendingdoom have been nothing but positive, even when we disagree it's positive. Feel 2impendingdoom is an asset to the community and enjoy reading his posts.

Yeah we need to be adults. Donkeyhote and Equineluvr....horrible. But the ones that get banned are the ones that actually contribute instead of shill ever thread.

Thank you for your kind words:)

Agreed on all points

Yeah about time someone addressed this. I am tired to argue with shills about pizzagate/pedogate not being true on this Forum. I just ignore them now and down vote. But for me the hole point of having mods is that they prevent this.. "We are already on a forum for people that believe in PizzaGate.. And we are trying to investigate it. "Thats what the PG forum should be all about".

Not for us to be harashed by shills that dont belive in the investigation. Or have our posts deleted just b/q we rise new questions that might not directly linked to PG but is pedo related. (thats how new leads are found) . And definitely not ban researcher that has been around for a long time.

Thats in my eyes, preventing an investigation from being done.

@DarkMath. I don´t like M_F, he delete posts left and right. (Without a really good answer, why?) There has been a lot of talk about him being a shill. How can we get you reinstated? Hate to loose a sane voice in this investigation.

I am all for having better requirements to make comments, downvote´s and more active and involved moderator´s.

Thanks for a great post @VieBleu @Vindicator

Interesting I didn't know it had changed to 0...I think 100 is better.

@quantokitty

Thanks for pinging! I fully support the two points. Also, kinda freaks me out that DarkMath was banned, I've always been ok with Vindicator, but never really got what people were bitching about re: MF. I happened to catch the exchange in question, and now I see what the problem is. I've always thought that voat IS the deep state; it's kind of a petrie dish for pizzagate study. Ima ping my favorite lurker @fartnigger.

You have my full support on all the points you've rasied and it's concerning that so many of us (inc myself) had no knowledge that the CCP req had been revoked. Well done for putting this together and Admin, reinstate the accounts @Darkmath & @2impendingdoom. Quit manufacturing internecines to justify your existence!!

1. On the main page sidebar it states - "Minimum CCP required to downvote in this sub: 0" I want to return to 100 CCP points (comment points) required before a new account can MAKE SUBMISSIONS OR DOWNVOAT.

To downvoat yes it should be reinstated but not for no comments or submissions until 100CCP. Or else you give accounts that shouldnt be banned like @darkmath @2impendingdoom too many hoops to go through when they make a new account just to get their voices heard. Meaning sucking up to the "hive mind" of the day to get points in order to place a submission.

Also I think that negative CCP restricts new users to like 3 posts an hour(?) and you cant message anyone until achieving 100CCP(?). And new submissions by shills or what not I consider harmless since they get downvoated any ways and it gives MF some work to do to make it look like he is doing something.

1. Vindicator would be willing to assume one Ownership slot

Dont care...the stale mod accounts should be removed tho.

You've got my vote.

Absolutely yes on the minimum CCP. Given the topics being discussed, it begs for shilling to derail. Why enable that?

I am definitely game, salute you VieBleu for taking the lead.

I am with you 100% thanks for taking charge and putting this post together.

I also support ownership to user who is active in subverse sunajAeon

I concur return to 100 CCP points (comment points) required before a new account can COMMENT OR DOWNVOAT sunajAeon

I agree. Should reinstate some rules to help clean things up.

If im not mistaken having anything but 0 will make the sub not appear on v/all

Thanks for pinging, VB.

1) I agree with reinstatement of the 100 CCP rule before receiving downvoating privilege.

1a) We may want to consider restarting everyone at 0 CCP in order to jettison the current shills that have been here a long time and have gathered points.

1b) I suggest that we encourage participants to bestow their upvoats mindfully so as not to encourage shills--based on the reading of an intentionally misleading headline, for instance.

2) I agree with installing Vindicator as an Owner who will be actively engaged in the subverse and effectively serving as a moderator.

3) I suggest that Millenial_Falcon rotate out of his moderator position.

4) I suggest that you, VieBleu, rotate into a moderator position.

5) I request that the term “spam” be officially defined and included as one of the posting rules so that we know what we’re being accused of when banned for it and ideally to avoid it in the first place.

6) I suggest that the subverses pizzagate and pedogate be combined because they so often bleed into each other and because much moderating and posting time is wasted in trying to prove a relationship to pizzagate and in deciding where to draw the line between them. Also, potential research connections are easily missed because of this separation.

@matheasysolutions, @DietCokeHead1

Could it be implemented that you must post in introductions before posting here? Then you can keep the 0 ccp for commenting. Should throw bots for a loop.

Maybe even implement a no voting without an introduction? We'll spot the bots and report them this way.

I would be more than happy to vote for Vindicator and a higher CCP downvoting requirement..

Agree with the 100 CPP points. Mods should be voted on by the group, or some other kind of selection process that creates accountability. Or maybe we just make a rule that posts with a certain # of downvotes get removed, put it in control of the people rather than 9 questionable "leaders." This control-the-narrative-by-fiat bs we have is outrageous.

1 More Vote! I agree that both @2impendingdoom and @DarkMath should be reinstated. They have always been valuable assets to our cause and ready to fight our adversaries (if you know who I mean). Also I agree that Millennial Falcon has caused some members much aggravation and is not easy to deal with. My vote is for @Vindicator being much easier to reason with and has been more of a help than a hindrance, like some. Also I would like to say that no shills should be suggested for the list, please. The down voating has been profuse, for many of us, as you all well know. I only request one very special addition to be added @Wolftrail7272

Yep... Agreed 100%. Anything we can do to ensure legit contributions and quiet the shill forces.

I think that's what was meant.

@RedditRefugee, @flyingcuttlefish, @3141592653, @EmeraldRoses,

@Silverlining, @duhiki, @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt, @River_Otter, @Ushi, @AmyJames

@JimmyLionstar1, @noone222, @The1stLantern @exposethecrininals, @xtzx4

@pizzagate3456, @Amino69, @HollandDrive,@Gilderoy @Benkitchen105

@BackAtItAgain, @KillAllPedos, @GumShoe @piglifter @truthseekertx, @twistedmac11,

To be clear, requiring 100 comment points to 'comment" would require a user to earn all those points from "posts?" Or do I have the terminology mixed up? I believe the only limitation I've had here and in other subs is the inability to downvote with less than 100 comment points .

Beyond that clarification, I don't think I'm qualified to provide much helpful input. I'm not a big social media guy and have only been here a few months. On the plus side, you won't find me posting stuff just to toot my horn or earn points.

Lastly, I do generally oppose pinpoint censorship of any speech including antisemitism. The argument that it makes us look bad seems too weak to justify censorship.

I will say that I admire @Vindicator and others for the devotion of their time and withstanding the scrutiny for their efforts. I just choose other heroic acts to save the world. ;-)

@LostandFound @Psalm144-1, @Godwillwin @redditsuckz, @pbvrocks

@EricKaliberhall, @pizzagate007, @Shillary, @RagingShieldMaiden, @ThighHighSwampBoots

@pete2016, @LionElTrump, @Tanngrisnir, @EvaEverywhere, @Judgejewdy @2003408

@EQJ, @anonymousgate, @FoxMcCloud11, @Amino69, @Drainingswamps, @pby1000

@SecondAmendment, @Verite1, @sarrah, @FirstAmendment, @pizzagatecharlottte

@DerivaUK @AssFaceSandwich2, @sunajAeon, @nightshiftowl, @Shillaxe

@bibigirl_, @pungent @ourdreamtoo @truthseekertx, @RebelSkum,

I agree with both! Thank You for including me in the vote😀

what about the change back to 100 comment points to downvoat or comment?

points for commenting - 100 limit before commenting or downvoating keeps shills from making new accounts constantly and running wild

Yes to both suggestions.

I agree to these changes.

Given the incident a month ago with that mass scale false flag attempt against both us and r/thedonald, should we have a rule 5? One against "false flag baiting"?

I'm glad that and the change to "evidende planting of anti semitism failed. Good thing I got that tip from my man on r/thedonald regarding CNN and sounded the alarm here.

I'm still a bit on edge, being on "Yellow Alert" status or this entire month.

@carmencita

Thank you for taking the time and making the effort to research these proposed changes and post this, @VieBleu. Mad props to @Vindicator, too, because I've seen you take on a Herculean task and handle it very well here. You both most certainly have my support, and if there is anything that I can do to help in any way, please let me know. I have been here since Day One, although I lurked for the first couple of months (under a different UserName). I lurked for a relatively long period of time, and by the time I was ready to post -- BAM -- I had forgotten my password. I had to create a new account and start from scratch, so here I am.

Back in the olden days of the Pizzagate Forum (i.e., November 2016), new accounts were not allowed to join right in. I distinctly remember how much more civil, peaceful, and pedagogical (a GOOD kind of a "ped" word!) this place was in the early days of this sub. I'm sure that the reason it's gone downhill into a shill-infested swamp is because of the CCP requirement changes that you mention.

So I, for one, would love to see the minimum CCP requirement return. Think of it as our very own Wall, and Mexico doesn't even have to pay for it. This place is a tough enough place to visit, even without the shills, simply because the subject matter is so shocking, gruesome, and nauseating. If we can reinstate the CCP requirements I think the forum will become a much more focused, streamlined place, and we won't have to waste our time dealing with downvoats and insults to the shills who are among us.

So my vote is "YES." Thank you, @VieBleu. I'll help if there is anything I can do. #MakeVoatPizzagateSubforumGreatAgain

You've got my full support!!!!

Thanks for the PING! I have been BANNED from Pizzagate for linking to the removed submissions where a lot of great posts were indiscriminately deleted by M_F. I was accused of SPAM :) I know that DarkMath has also been banned. I can no longer comment in v/Pizzagate

I would like to be reinstated. Anyway I think that, as a community, there should be some consideration of what M_F is really doing here. If he isn't going to apply the rules consistently either he should go or we should think of migrating elsewhere. Anyway, thanks for the opportunity to comment and forgive me for adding five more good posters to your list:

@ESOTERICshade, @independenceday, @Godwillwin, @Jem777, @flyingcuttlefish.

Agreed on all points! Thank you for leading the charge.

^^

Change #1 sounds like a no brainer. I can't believe it had changed either.

I don't know how much help I will be but I definitly agree about the 100 CCP points @pizza-party-pooper @2impendingdoom @Tyranny-News-Network @Jem777 @GeorgeT @micha_ @Trumpocrat2020 @Benkitchen105 @Darlingnikkiaz @GrDec @DarkMath @4_InquiringMinds @Turnovers @PizzaGateDiscovery @Infopractical @waxdino @kazza64 @carmencita @Gothamgirl @PM_Me_Your_Clam_Pics @ThePedoHunter @privatepizza @crystalclear

@sprok @THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

@dickfart @cakeoflightylight @witch_doctor1 @sound_of_silence @bronwynne

@victuruslibertas @zlomsocz @2impendingdoom @wellington33 @mandevilaffect

@JeremiahSinclair @Angelight @keepthefaith @zzvoat @21yearsofdigging

@keepthefaith @nitro169 @LadyLiberty @nosy @Catchthem

@Enigmatic_Continuum @stellarcorpse @FoxDen @DarkMath @TheGrimReader

@YingYangMom @V____Z @Lantana @anonOpenPress @rwb

@truth_will_out @Mrs_Ogynist01 @Sheilaaliens @Mad_As_Hell @SeekingWithin

@meowski @Commoner @TrishaUK @EvaEverywhere @MolochHunter

@Piscina @cantsleepawink @LA_Trump @redditsuckz @Fateswebb

@Mammy @carmencita @SoSpricyHotDog @madmama @lawyer4justice

@SecondAmendment @trueringstrue @Alois_sticklgruber @GoodGodKirk @anotherdream

@neo50 @sugarskull @Pizzalawyer @Cc1914 @momadona

You have my vote.

I had no idea this was removed. That's ridiculous.

1. On the main page sidebar it states - "Minimum CCP required to downvote in this sub: 0" I want to return to 100 CCP points (comment points) required before a new account can COMMENT OR DOWNVOAT. The forum started like this, most of us went through it with little problem, and it provides a thin membrane of protection for the sub from new account shills which are our worst problem. This CCP requirement was removed without notification months ago, and it does this forum no favors in the shill department. I want to see the 100 point requirement reinstated.

On a side note.. Voat only registers the first 5 pings. Do the others 5 at a time in the comments.

@shoosh @SoldierofLight @Laskar @fartyshorts @wokethefkup

@WhyAserverWasBuilt @concernedvegan @hypercat @DerivaUK @badastrid

@Blacksmith21 @Tyranny-News-Network @Mylifeforanorange @mooteensy @Votescam

@ProudTruther @Warmoose76 @Jem777 @Criticalthinker615 @11-11

@FBI-ANON @angry_mob @JesusRules @Factfinder2 @whitehand

@icuntstopswearing @B_dog @DeathTooMasons @Takeitslow @darkknight111

@SayWhatNOWAY @Dressage2 @equineluvr @1ew @LongTimeReader

@SturdyGal @emeraldeye @CreepsNo @druhill007 @duhiki

I believe only the first five of your pings went through. Maybe thats only for comments, Im not 100% sure.

AND YES !!!! I was just thinking about this the other day..

NO SUBMISSIONS UNTIL 100 POINTS ARE ACHIEVED