@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion
Post in question
@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.
All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.
Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.
EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post
I rest my case.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
Join the club bro, tons of people have left because of this. More are leaving every week.
Crensch ago
"This" what?
ESOTERICshade ago
He is insinuating himself and his opinion into the research topics. Its all in the deleted thread. This was a brilliant thread, to say the least. It takes a brilliant mind to make all these types of connections. This is just one of hundreds he has deleted and the best researchers the sub ever had have left over it.
Matter of fact @swordfish69 and @letsdothis1 are the only two left I can think of right now. There used to be dozens.
Planned Parenthood works with pimps that sex traffic children. They run the trafficked children through Planned Parenthood and sell the fetal tissue products. The pizzagate community wants a light shone on it and Falcon thwarts it as "abortion politics."
He is the one making it political, not us. All we care about is the fact that sex trafficked children are being used to prop up the fetal tissue sales as a closed loop system. Groom child sex slaves, harvest their fetuses, rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat.....
Falcon says "yes but they make medical treatments for stem cells and help people with it too." Maybe so but we don't care what he thinks. We don't hear his philosophy, or his politics. We just want to be allowed to go where the facts lead us. Period.
That is just ONE of the brilliant associations that were connected to Marina Abromavic, Welcome Trust, Democrats, Podesta, and a whole host of complicated connections.
We don't feel that its his job to give us his opinion and philosophy about our findings. He does not have to like it. We don't like where it leads us either but we go there to shine a light on it.
You guys can defend him all day long and it won't solve anything at this point because the posting community has no faith left in him at all. It expired. To put it bluntly we want him gone.
This place is a shadow of its former self and in my opinion it is because he has driven off the best pizzagate minds and researchers in the business. We can argue about that all day, or not, but the fact is that the sub has suffered and will continue to do so. This aint' rocket science. Just my opinion but I want for this sub to cut its losses with this mod.
He has a history of banning people like me and i'm one of the few that will speak because I don't care if he bans me or not. I just want decent moderation and he is not it.
If it has come down to the point that we have to fight him over research this good because of his opinions then we are all just spinning in the mud. It does not have to be this hard, he makes it this hard.
I'm sick of this so bad I don't even check this sub and read it like I used to, like a lot of other people.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2390929
@kevdude @vindicator @swordfish69 @think- @letsdothis1
Crensch ago
No, it wasn't.
letsdothis1 ago
I've just seen my report card. I agree that sometimes I didn't make some connecting sentences with this post because I had so much information and was pressed for time. Some people did understand what I was getting at but those would be the ones who have been here a while and already have some background knowledge.
I don't really understand the need to delete without giving someone the opportunity to clarify certain bits when clearly the post contains much information, but as Esoteric says, it's your subverse.
If this platform was truly evolving over time we shouldn't have to constantly create posts for people who have zilch knowledge of our research here i.e. pander to the lowest common denominator. To be honest, I'm surprised this forum has lasted as long as it has here.
I see now you are suggesting a poll. Now where have I seen that before ? Hmm... now let me think....
Crensch ago
This is the level of your posts.
Nah, but you should be able to point to something that weaves it all together when you go to present your findings to others.
Or are you just researching it for your own benefit?
Who are you going to convince with that? Yourselves? A court? A jury? The normies?
letsdothis1 ago
Irony?
My posts are not just a random collection of unrelated links. They already 'weave' together - though granted, I'm not always 100% successful and explaining every point and in that regard some posts are weaker than others.
Who am I trying to convince? Depends on the data...and who's listening.
Crensch ago
That's what they look like.
Voat has a fuckton of lurkers. Are you not trying to convince everyone?
This post is one of my lowest-voted posts. 1.6 years ago.
All I said was that there's no good reason to believe the Holocaust happened.
So I set out to present my findings about it to Voat. I made a claim, then linked information about it.
Have you seen the front page of Voat?
What have you done?
ESOTERICshade ago
You were also given the opportunity to do so right? Did the mod tell you that your lead in was not descriptive enough and deny you the opportunity to prove your premise?
Crensch ago
All right, I lied. I'm going to respond to this ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT.
I MADE THAT SUBVERSE MYSELF YOU RETARD.
MY WORK WAS SO GOOD THAT THE ENTIRE WEBSITE CHANGED THEIR GODDAMN MINDS.
Your work, however?
Kek.
ESOTERICshade ago
That was my point
Crensch ago
Then make your own subverse, retard.