I have written at least twice to "message the moderators" "https://voat.co/messages/compose?recipient=v/pizzagate" and received no reply. Does the link work or am I wasting my time even more?
I had a post deleted yesterday by Kwijibo. The post was 10 years ago William Sessions had evidence of fraud on Hillarys "Childrens Defense Fund" ( https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620595. It was judged by him to be a rule 1 violation.
This had got about 40 upvotes and there was helpful discussion to research further.
This was deleted, with no warnings. It would be polite , helpful and in the spirit of a research community to warn someone.
But no, all i get is a comment that "we don't warn people " "Read the rules" or similar and a simplistic venn diagram , but no explanation of why my post did not fit into that diagram in the deleters opinion.
As well as no explanation there is apparently no appeal so i cannot even try and convince a mod who does not understand why it is relevant. If ther eis no appeal, moderators should warn and be alot more careful that it is not their knowledge that is lacking.
Fine " It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate relevance." but for a researcher like myself who has been researching, writing and publishing child sexual abuse (pedophilia does not infer abuse takes place) for years, my mistake was to attribute a higher level of knowledge of child sexual abuse to a moderator than this one actually has.
It may not be clear to one moderator of why it does fit into pizzagate,( or he may be a shill) but I thought it was obvious enough putting fraud on Hillarys* "Childrens Defense Fund". To me then it is obvious if associated with Hillary, a satanist, criminal and sexual abuser and it may well be not actually saving children from trafficking but being used for child trafficking, especially if it is used to launder money. Do you not even think pizzagate should be investigating something called "Childrens Defense Fund" that is associated with Hillary? She was head for several years.
So no warning, no explanation from deleting mod, no appeal, no replies from other mods. I appear to be wasting my time on this forum.
But it was not just my posts that were deleted.
Jeffrey Epstein donation details to Chuck Schumer 50 upvotes https://littlesis.org/relationship/view/id/234060 ( i dont know why the voat thread does not copy) . Jeffrey Epstein is one of the keys to the child abuse. Why can this?
Chuck Schumer, Pay-for-Play schemes, EB5-5 investor visa program and human trafficking loopholes 63 upvoats https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620334. Human trafficking methods/ ratlines are in many cases the same as child trafficking. What is the child trafficking method from pizzagate?? You wont find out if you delete threads like this. (Chuck Schumer also may be relevant)
Do we have to ELI5 just so a post isnt deleted? Sorry that is not the best way to research and collaborate. Bring everyone down to the level of the most stupid mod. In fact it is guaranteed to shut down the research, by artificially restricting.
The following is great original research I saw some discussion of George Webb and Waco https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1621538 . If you find the cocaine ratlines, then they stand a good chance of overlapping and being the ratlines for child trafficking. Deleted without warning and any collaboration lost as the OP name does not now appear on it. Crazy. This research took much time. I know how long decent research takes. How do you think the poster feels?
If mods need to delete so many posts, then there is something wrong with the set up of the group.It was always clear that Pizzagate should be the initial group for any postings, as it is the one most people would join, due to the name, and another group set up for more in depth research. But that is not how it was chosen to be , so the structure is set that moderators will have to delete loads of posts and the baby gets thrown away with the bathwater.
It is clear that this is not a good structure for quality child sexual abuse research collaboration, in fact the structure and system confines it.
When people questioned some deletions and there were many - 50? last night - did they get useful answers,
No they got that deleted eg Millenial Falcon just deleted a potentially very important and relevant thread 41 uv 53 comments https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1621493
Some deleted posts may be shills but what about the genuine posters. how do they feel, and all those lurkers and survivors who feel that it will not be worth them posting?
Whilst writing probably my last post, as my time is better spent elsewhere, then the elephant in the room must be mentioned, Is Voat really about free speech? Voat has been said to be such but was Peter Thiel ever a champion of free speech.
He shut down Gawker http://archive.is/6OUun
and he created the best spying software for the spies, not the spied upon Palantir http://archive.is/Pd86d
I never even got to be a full member of Voat - i could not donwvote as i did not achieve enough comment points - a bizzare measure of whether someone can be allowed to downvoat. The initial lack of clarity about various things is another issue that needs to be addressed
Stanford Experiment explains how some mods on pizzagate act like they do - It is easy to let a little power go to your head and forget about the people in their positions doing genuine research and getting it deleted. Every mod should watch this on a regular basis Stanford Experiment https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1622469
Vindicator ago
Foxxy, just an FYI: you really need to ping mods directly, reply to one of their comments, or DM them to make sure they see questions.
We primarily spend our time hanging out on NEW, refreshing the screen every few minutes and removing the avalanche of shitposts that flood the board at all hours of the day and night. Next priority after that is looking at personal inbox to answer comment replies and DMs. Often, I personally do not make it all the way through that! I almost always forget to check the generic subverse mod mail, as do most of the other mods, simply because there is not enough time and there's no flag anywhere reminding me. Rarely do I get over here to pizzagatemods to read posts. I have only been a mod for a month, and most of the active mods have been around less time than that and are still learning how to do all the things they need to do. Millennial_Falcon is on the most, but is usually way too busy cleaning up the overnight pileup of shitposts to check this subverse and the generic modmail.
So: if you need mod attention, ping or DM. One word of advice...we mods are volunteering to do this poop-scooping job because we genuinely care about corruption in our government that is harming kids and were users who were asked by a mod to help fend off shills so this forum can function. There isn't one of us that doesn't feel bad about removing a post on a helpful topic because it doesn't comply with the submission guidelines. But if we don't enforce the rules consistently, Voat will shut us down for selective censorship.
You will get much better results when you want mods to clarify a removal -- or a decision not to remove for that matter -- if you start with the simple courtesy of ASSUMING THE BEST INTENT when you address someone. The fastest way to get yourself not taken seriously by mods (or anyone at ProtectVoat) is to talk to them from the assumption they're an asshole with ill intent, as you did in this post. We deal with dozens of actual shills and trolls daily and that tone is the tone they use. The vast majority of removals are due to actual violations of the rules. Sometimes we make a mistake, because we've been removing shitposts for hours, are tired, are trying to keep up and just don't understand the connections the OP thinks he or she is making. Sometimes it's because different mods have slightly different understandings of the rules. However, we all WANT users to repost solid, compliant submissions that we can leave on the board.
Frankly, your psychoanalysis that mods here are on a power trip is insulting and actually evidence that it is YOU whose ego is involved, who feels entitled to judge others you literally know nothing about. None of us asked to be here...we were users who were invited based on our comments, who have given up other activities to help. You may want to examine your conscience, and start asking questions and listening more, instead of jumping to conclusions and telling people they're the problem.
Now, I have personally been trying to work with users I feel are people of good will whose posts I have had to remove on how to fix them so they can be reposted. If you would like help with a specific post, please DM me the link and I will attempt to assist.
foxxywoxxy ago
Still not a squeek from cowardly delete happy power crazed janitor Kwijibo [J] You are john wayne Stanford Experiment https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1622469. if you cant justify then dont delete
Crensch ago
Maybe you should ping him, then.
foxxywoxxy ago
how?
foxxywoxxy ago
Still no reply after 24 hours. The mods are negligent in their jobs and have no answers. Shameful
Crensch ago
You know, you're pretty stupid for not pinging the people you specifically want in the conversation.
Posting here is great, but not every mod checks this sub every day.
foxxywoxxy ago
I message the moderators, i post in the moderators sub then i get abused for not doing something else. hey look at yourself buddy as to why things are going wrong if thisis your attitude. try not doing ad hominem abuse and try addressing the message
foxxywoxxy ago
I dont even know how to ping him and i have written to him as well, as well as to the message the moderators. you are just rude and not helpful, and you are meant to be a mod? ffs
Crensch ago
@foxxywoxxy <--- ping
This isn't Reddit. There are no kid gloves here. If you want to engage in tone-fallacy while saying I'm not helpful, that's on you. My comments invariably are useful content, no matter whether delivered with sugar or venom.
The rules were set by the users of the subverse. If you cannot abide by them, then you do not belong there. The first post linked in your long, rambling OP was rightly determined to have fuck-all to do with pizzagate.
Another user suggested that "maybe there's a connection" - fine, then you make that connection before posting it.
Any questions?
foxxywoxxy ago
thankyou @crensch Strawman argument i never said it was reddit, nor am used to reddit. If you think my post is not to do with pizzagate then it is you that are ignorant, but at least defend it with an explanation not just abuse, If you think fraud on Hillarys Children defense fund is not clear enough , then it is you that is lacking in knowledge as well as good attitude. Your ad hominem abuse someone and dont answer the message, then it is me at fault lol No i dont belong here, as i dont want to be ruled by rude, arrogant and ignorant pedants who have a little bit of power and abuse it , and choose not to answer the question but just abuse the other person.
Crensch ago
Then you act like a redditor, with a username age coinciding with a reddit migration to Voat, congratulations.
Fraud has fuck-all to do with pizzagate. Period. Show where there's child trafficking and fucking going on, or piss off.
I answered everything, clown. Stop being dishonest, and admit if you can't nut-up to catch child fuckers.
I answered your question, bitch. Every one of them. Power abuse? Where. Show me where I broke the rules of the subverse with my mod powers. Please. Point it out to me so I can admit I'm wrong.
Until then, you're a clown, and nobody should ever take you seriously.
foxxywoxxy ago
@crensch If your mind cannot see that a Hillary stop trafficking organisation involved in fraud could just well be the opposite and actually be a child trafficking organisation, then it does not say much for your knowledge or intelligence. by that score then Hillary paid $265,000 by company caught illegally selling human organs/marrow/tissue! with 420 upvotes should be deleted. doh Do i have to point out that hillary is connected to podesta too??
foxxywoxxy ago
Did I say you absued you power as a mod. No . But you did abuse me. yes Did you answer my questions in this ? no @crensch
I have written at least twice to "message the moderators" "https://voat.co/messages/compose?recipient=v/pizzagate" and received no reply. Does the link work or am I wasting my time even more?
I had a post deleted yesterday by Kwijibo. The post was 10 years ago William Sessions had evidence of fraud on Hillarys "Childrens Defense Fund" ( https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620595. It was judged by him to be a rule 1 violation. This had got about 40 upvotes and there was helpful discussion to research further.
This was deleted, with no warnings. It would be polite , helpful and in the spirit of a research community to warn someone. But no, all i get is a comment that "we don't warn people " "Read the rules" or similar and a simplistic venn diagram , but no explanation of why my post did not fit into that diagram in the deleters opinion.
As well as no explanation there is apparently no appeal so i cannot even try and convince a mod who does not understand why it is relevant. If ther eis no appeal, moderators should warn and be alot more careful that it is not their knowledge that is lacking.
Fine " It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate relevance." but for a researcher like myself who has been researching, writing and publishing child sexual abuse (pedophilia does not infer abuse takes place) for years, my mistake was to attribute a higher level of knowledge of child sexual abuse to a moderator than this one actually has.
It may not be clear to one moderator of why it does fit into pizzagate,( or he may be a shill) but I thought it was obvious enough putting fraud on Hillarys* "Childrens Defense Fund". To me then it is obvious if associated with Hillary, a satanist, criminal and sexual abuser and it may well be not actually saving children from trafficking but being used for child trafficking, especially if it is used to launder money. Do you not even think pizzagate should be investigating something called "Childrens Defense Fund" that is associated with Hillary? She was head for several years.
So no warning, no explanation from deleting mod, no appeal, no replies from other mods. I appear to be wasting my time on this forum. But it was not just my posts that were deleted.
Jeffrey Epstein donation details to Chuck Schumer 50 upvotes https://littlesis.org/relationship/view/id/234060 ( i dont know why the voat thread does not copy) . Jeffrey Epstein is one of the keys to the child abuse. Why can this?
Chuck Schumer, Pay-for-Play schemes, EB5-5 investor visa program and human trafficking loopholes 63 upvoats https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620334. Human trafficking methods/ ratlines are in many cases the same as child trafficking. What is the child trafficking method from pizzagate?? You wont find out if you delete threads like this. (Chuck Schumer also may be relevant)
Do we have to ELI5 just so a post isnt deleted? Sorry that is not the best way to research and collaborate. Bring everyone down to the level of the most stupid mod. In fact it is guaranteed to shut down the research, by artificially restricting.
The following is great original research I saw some discussion of George Webb and Waco https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1621538 . If you find the cocaine ratlines, then they stand a good chance of overlapping and being the ratlines for child trafficking. Deleted without warning and any collaboration lost as the OP name does not now appear on it. Crazy. This research took much time. I know how long decent research takes. How do you think the poster feels?
If mods need to delete so many posts, then there is something wrong with the set up of the group.It was always clear that Pizzagate should be the initial group for any postings, as it is the one most people would join, due to the name, and another group set up for more in depth research. But that is not how it was chosen to be , so the structure is set that moderators will have to delete loads of posts and the baby gets thrown away with the bathwater.
It is clear that this is not a good structure for quality child sexual abuse research collaboration, in fact the structure and system confines it. When people questioned some deletions and there were many - 50? last night - did they get useful answers,
No they got that deleted eg Millenial Falcon just deleted a potentially very important and relevant thread 41 uv 53 comments https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1621493
Some deleted posts may be shills but what about the genuine posters. how do they feel, and all those lurkers and survivors who feel that it will not be worth them posting?
Whilst writing probably my last post, as my time is better spent elsewhere, then the elephant in the room must be mentioned, Is Voat really about free speech? Voat has been said to be such but was Peter Thiel ever a champion of free speech. He shut down Gawker http://archive.is/6OUun and he created the best spying software for the spies, not the spied upon Palantir http://archive.is/Pd86d
I never even got to be a full member of Voat - i could not donwvote as i did not achieve enough comment points - a bizzare measure of whether someone can be allowed to downvoat. The initial lack of clarity about various things is another issue that needs to be addressed
Stanford Experiment explains how some mods on pizzagate act like they do - It is easy to let a little power go to your head and forget about the people in their positions doing genuine research and getting it deleted. Every mod should watch this on a regular basis Stanford Experiment https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1622469
Crensch ago
Ho, ho! This is getting interesting.
Do you remember when you wrote this?
Because that looks suspiciously like exactly you acusing me of abusing my mod power.
What question did I not answer?
Only active mods will look at "message the moderators", and they're stretched thin as it is. My role as moderator is to assume the risk of being disappeared for control of the subverse, and was also originally to keep this entire subverse from getting destroyed by older Voat users who didn't like the Redditors coming here.
Fraud =/= child trafficking and fucking.
No, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620595/7914374 is a perfectly acceptable response. Mods have to remove hundreds of posts per day, we cannot treat you all like special snowflakes.
You were not banned. Re-post with that link to child fucking or trafficking clearly described and sourced. Post cannot be reinstated. The amount of upvotes is irrelevant.
DING DING DING! Mods are not the arbiters of what is valid and what is not. The only thing mods have in their power to do is remove rule-violating posts. Not doing so, or removing rule-abiding posts gets that mod removed (after a warning, maybe two).
Not at all. SOME mods might know everything there is to know about this, but most probably do not. The rules are there to keep the information at the fingertips of those that do not know everything about that particular branch of the investigation. Which is usually most of the people watching the subverse.
Laundering money =/= child fucking unless the link can be shown to be true. A man that goes on a shooting spree at a club doesn't have the company he works for investigated just because that's where he got the money for the gun. What a stupid idea.
Maybe. What mover&shaker hasn't bowed to some "defend the chilluns" virtue signalling? SHOW YOUR WORK, RESEARCHER. It's really not that difficult.
Lies, as evidenced by the response of the mod. You're a liar.
Jesus fucking tap-dancing christ. Did you not read your fucking comment responses?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1620334/7914397
@sandersnista_4_TRUMP EXPLAINED IT TO YOU. SO DID @KWIJIBO!
Yes. Your personal opinion on the matter means fuck-all, because this is the best way to research and collaborate. ALL research and collaboration has notes for the people to get caught up. It's the only way to guarantee NOT shutting down the research, you imbecile.
Literally anything stands a good chance of overlapping and being X for Y here. Networked companies and people all intertwine so tightly that you could come up with more "leads" than all of us could fully uncover in our lifetimes.
Like a rule-breaking, butthurt whiner? If he doesn't, he should.
No, there's fucking not. There's something wrong with every troll, shill, and idiot trying to muck up the place with garbage-tier posting.
That's not how it is, and we still get TONS of non-rulebreaking posts each day.
Absolutely essential that difficult-to-catch-up-with submissions are removed. Period.
Because people are almost certainly being paid to divide and conquer, sow seeds of discord, and otherwise attempt to create chaos here - because the childfuckers with money want this gone.
Ok... ok. This is going to be the last part of your long post I'll respond to, because THIS IS TOO STUPID TO CONSIDER LEGITIMATE.
The post you're referring to links to this post
RULE 3
The title *is a fucking clickbait title about who? What arrests?
RULES EXIST FOR A REASON. I should be able to READ what it is about before watching it, then be able to confirm that the content is the same as the title.
The title tells me precisely dick.
foxxywoxxy ago
"as i dont want to be ruled by rude, arrogant and ignorant pedants who have a little bit of power and abuse it ," Did i say that was about you? NO. So your accusatiosn are false.
"Fraud =/= child trafficking and fucking." Fraud was the titel of the article linked - that is why i put it as title of the article
" Your personal opinion on the matter means fuck-all, because this is the best way to research and collaborate. ALL research and collaboration has notes for the people to get caught up. It's the only way to guarantee NOT shutting down the research, you imbecile." My opinion is only worth nothing if the mods and owner wont listen, you have shown that to be true. lol you think the best way to research is on a shill infested , probably shill moderated , shill owned, and definitely abusive owned group. What planet are you from?
"You were not banned. " I never said i was banned?? My point still stands "no explanation there is apparently no appeal so i cannot even try and convince a mod who does not understand why it is relevant. "
"Lies, as evidenced by the response of the mod. You're a liar." No. An explanation is WHY the post does not fit into the simplistic venn diagram or rule 1 not the statement
You have at least finally addressed some of the points even though abusively and wrongly but it confirms my opinion to leave if a person like @crensch is owner of this. It quite obviously is not the place for research.
"eg Millenial Falcon just deleted a potentially very important and relevant thread" It was not the post it links to , the point was , which you overlooked is a transparent system WHEN someone complains. you have admitted noone takes any notice in pizzagate mods or message the moderators. so what choice is there for raising a point about deletion??
Your argumetn sare largely ad hominem abuse and straw man arguemtns or i am right cos i say i am,so i will not address those , but you remain happy that you have shown to many people that v/pizzagate is not the place for them
You appear to consider that research is done best in a place of abuse, with shills, no warnigns, no explations,no appeals run by an abusive dictator . Hey i disagree. its your group. carry on abusing
Crensch ago
Bullshit. Not a single Voater would fall for that facetious backpedaling. Now you're both a liar, AND dishonest.
We don't WANT the fucking title of the article.
You're saying that as if you cannot submit a post that follows the rules. Stop being deliberately obtuse, you're looking more and more like a troll now. That, or you're a woman that can't admit she's wrong and works through things like this with her feelings instead of with her intellect.
This is where my response to this ends.
HE EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHY. Fraud =/= Child trafficking/fucking.
You'll get nowhere if you cannot stop being so stupid.
I can guarantee you one thing, nothing is going to change. I can also guarantee you that this abuse you so desire to not have directed at you will get much worse if you do not admit that you were backpedaling, and actually did mean what you obviously meant, and that the mod explained exactly why your post was removed.
foxxywoxxy ago
If your mind cannot see that a Hillary stop trafficking organisation involved in fraud could just well be the opposite and actually be a child trafficking organisation, then it does not say much for your knowledge or intelligence. by that score then Hillary paid $265,000 by company caught illegally selling human organs/marrow/tissue! with 420 upvotes should be deleted. doh Do i have to point out that hillary is connected to podesta too??
foxxywoxxy ago
Incredible your first response is abuse of me, not addressing the points i make . thats voat for you
Crensch ago
/v/introductions
Check the sticky.
Crensch ago
You don't know the first thing about Voat. You can't see the content because you can't get over the fact that it's not delivered with kid gloves.
foxxywoxxy ago
You dont know about child abuse research obviously, you do know about abuse though
Crensch ago
You don't understand what you're wanting here.
Your post is nothing but the co-opting of the PG resources for your own pet project of FRAUD. If there's a link to child trafficking and fucking, then show it in the OP. Until then, your post violated the rules and was rightly removed.
foxxywoxxy ago
oh dear. i have nothing to do with any projects on fraud. wrong aagin. What level do i hav eto go down to dumb everything down for the most stupid moderators who dont even understand the thing they are moderating, nor check the links. The child defense fund , which is meant to stop chidl trafficking, which Hillary was head of for a few years was fraudulent. Not a big jump considering all the child traficking revelations and Hillary to say that it needs investigation for doing the opposite of what it says and it may well be child trafficking. if this needs to be explained to you, it says it all that these posts are being deleted and you are the owner /shill
Crensch ago
Is there a connection to child trafficking/fucking, or is its ostensible goal all you have? That's like the shills posting about the pizza places near them and "satanic" swirls of art and other stupid shit.
Your post might have been fine had you written out that the org was specifically to stop child trafficking, but you were too stupid to write about it. I don't know for sure how you'd have posted it, so maybe it would have, maybe not. You seem adamant about breaking the rules, so I wouldn't hold my breath.
The rules can be pretty easily filtered down to "Put a fucking ELI5 with everything. The most ignorant, newest members should be able to pick right up where you're at and move forward."
foxxywoxxy ago
@crensch ignore my points,abuse me, i dont care, i was leaving anyway, but i am concerned about research into child sexual abuse, but you dont want to admit there could be anythign wrong with your approach
Crensch ago
I didn't ignore a single point you made. It's your fault that you made such stupid statements that I refused to continue until you admitted you were wrong with them. I took more time than you were worth here, and the entire community thanks you for fucking off now.
foxxywoxxy ago
you didnt take any on board is what i meant by" ignore"
Crensch ago
Your points were absurd, and the supporting arguments, if you can call them that, were laughable. There is only one right answer here, and I have reached it, while you have continued to piss and moan about how you can't follow such easy rules.
I assume you're not a child, so be a fucking adult and take some responsibility for your actions. You chose to make a post that runs afoul of the rules, it's not anyone else's job to fix that for you.
Follow the rules, or fuck off.
foxxywoxxy ago
more abuse
Crensch ago
Nobody cares about you.
foxxywoxxy ago
more abuse and you speak for everyone, the omnipotent abusive shill @crensch
Crensch ago
Yeah, it's obvious from this thread that you have nothing but whining to offer, so I speak for everyone when I say we'll all be happy you're gone. The only people mourning your loss will be those that want the place flooded with absolute shit.
foxxywoxxy ago
All i did was post the link, with what i thought was sufficient information to flag up that Hillarys "Childrens defense fund " was worthy of research. I put the fraud in as that was in the title of the article link and to show there was already something dodgy. My mistake was not realising that moderators were so dumb as to delete posts that to many people ( as evidenced by 40 upvotes) were worthy of further research. Then deleted - no warning, no explanation, no appeal, no responses - then after pushing for 24 hour -abuse and accusation from moderate / owner @crensch with a modicum of explanation.
Crensch ago
And you're literally too stupid to understand the reality of the situation. Pearls before swine. "modicum of explanation" my ass.
foxxywoxxy ago
more ad hominem abuse, control yourself
Crensch ago
Grow a pair, idiot.
foxxywoxxy ago
Have you ever stopped to consider that survivors of child abuse , many of whom want to help research abuse might actually find the atmosphere hostile. For your information as you appear to have no comprehension, confrontation can be extremely triggering for victims. So rather than telling people to grow a pair perhaps you should do some soul searching and change your aggressive, confrontational and abusive attitude @crensch. Otherwise the only explanation is that you are deliberately encouraging and creating an atmosphere positively hostile to the victims of what you are supposed to be exposing...............
Crensch ago
I do not, nor will I ever, care.
Fuck off to some hugbox, you fucking snowflake. I don't give a single fuck about "triggering" anyone. Voat is not the place for crybullies.
Not a chance.
I don't give a fuck about yours, theirs, or anyone's feelings. This is the internet. Sack up, or log out.
foxxywoxxy ago
ah very telling, the owner of a group investigating child sexual abuse that does not "give a fuck" about victims of child sexual abuse. It all becomes very clear.
Crensch ago
You're being dishonest again, troll.
Re-read what I actually said, instead of straw-manning my arguments.
foxxywoxxy ago
oh its very clear thanks @crensch You said you dont care about survivors of child abuse, yet you own a group investigating it...
me- Have you ever stopped to consider that survivors of child abuse , many of whom want to help research abuse might actually find the atmosphere hostile. [crensch] I do not, nor will I ever, care.
For your information tas you have no comprehension that confrontation can be extremely triggering for victims. [crensch] Fuck off to some hugbox, you fucking snowflake. I don't give a single fuck about "triggering" anyone. Voat is not the place for crybullies.
So rather than telling people to grow a pair perhaps you should do some soulsearching and change your confrontation and abusive attitude @crensch. [crensch] Not a chance.
Otherwise the only explanation is that you are deliberately encouraging and creating an atmosphere positively hostile to the victims of what you are supposed to be exposing............... [crensch] I don't give a fuck about yours, theirs, or anyone's feelings. This is the internet. Sack up, or log out.
Crensch ago
Wait, wait, wait...
Are you saying you seriously do not understand the difference between not giving a fuck about FEELINGS and not giving a fuck about humans/children?
Is that your malfunction here?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Oh fuck, you're just not worth the carbon you're made of.
foxxywoxxy ago
oh its very clear thanks @crensch You said you dont care about survivors of child abuse, yet you own a group investigating it...
Have you ever stopped to consider that survivors of child abuse , many of whom want to help research abuse might actually find the atmosphere hostile. [crensch] I do not, nor will I ever, care.
For your information tas you have no comprehension that confrontation can be extremely triggering for victims. [crensch] Fuck off to some hugbox, you fucking snowflake. I don't give a single fuck about "triggering" anyone. Voat is not the place for crybullies.
So rather than telling people to grow a pair perhaps you should do some soulsearching and change your confrontation and abusive attitude @crensch. [crensch] Not a chance.
Otherwise the only explanation is that you are deliberately encouraging and creating an atmosphere positively hostile to the victims of what you are supposed to be exposing............... [crensch] I don't give a fuck about yours, theirs, or anyone's feelings. This is the internet. Sack up, or log out.
Crensch ago
copy/paste shill. Time to move on now.
Crensch ago
Read. My. Fucking. Words. Troll.
I no longer believe you're arguing in good faith here. You're just trolling, because nobody could be so stupid that they believe such a blatantly absurd straw-man of my response. You at least know what a straw-man is, right?
foxxywoxxy ago
yet more ad hominem abuse is that your answer to everything ?/
Crensch ago
It's a great filter, as it causes subhumans like you to show your true colors.
foxxywoxxy ago
yet more ad hominem abuse
Crensch ago
Nobody cares.
Crensch ago
Nobody. Gives a fuck. About the title.
PG was, and is, an upvote farm. People upvote the content no matter how bad it is. The upvotes mean precisely dick.
LIAR
foxxywoxxy ago
you know everything wow - now try researching Hillarys Child Defense Fund
Crensch ago
Try proving that there was no explanation or response.
foxxywoxxy ago
you delete a post in way than 4 hours but dont have the courtesy to even justify your actions in that time