My first problem is that I am out of characters to include in the post. I would have included a lot more links and summaries if I had more room. I used a scraper to scrape all the links off of the articles, which are explained in the images of text and are explained on my site, which is broken down into images... though it is just easier to visit my site. I then moved the scraped links down to the bottom of the post and, essentially, they are already explained multiple times in the Chan posts, on the site, and on the captured images from the site. Essentially, there are three presentations of exactly the same information which adds up to about 200 pages of content (if you printed it out.)

These links would require a short sentence as an intro/summary. Just a brief intro what each chan discussion thread is about.

4Chan Part 1: http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/207818214

4Chan Part 2: http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/207807866

8chan: https://8ch.net/pol/res/13024681.html

I was hoping that this explanation was enough:

"It's all the same stuff that I've got in a lot of places."

"It is a lot of information that, ultimately, is ancillary to Pizzagate, but lends to the overwhelming amount of evidence that proves protected political pedophilia is true beyond a reasonable doubt and that the characters surrounding Comet Ping Pong are involved. This is probably the longest post in the history of the sub, and, in order to fit it all in the character count, with sources in links, I have imaged the content. RIP mobile."

Is there another explanation you would suggest? If so, I am probably going to have to start reworking a lot of it, because I will have to pull more text out in an image and link to the image.

You see why I have never really trusted the format. It's like trying to prove Pizzagate on Twitter. It is seemingly designed to prevent great posts. In fact, I had the most upvoted summary of Pizzagate, two years ago, but they chose Millenial Falcon's because I started by explaining Uranium One.

2) https://i.imgur.com/swKX2AO.pngPNG

I guess that can stay as is, since it is a meme.

I have no problem removing it altogether.

3) Introduction: https://files.catbox.moe/ezwhwh.pngPNG

Proof that Trump is 'living two lives'?

I am reasonably prepared to address that. Trump's strategies are not a secret, really. He used the Art of War as the premise for Art of the Deal and he sticks to the core concepts of these books. Given his career in reality TV, he is already well practiced at having a private life and a public life. If this is necessary. I can address it, but it will be a lot of work .

Imo it would be good to link to some explanation what the Skolkovo project and the Gulftainer deal are. Unless you have explained it in the three links of you webofslime sub, but I get 'whoops not found' error messages for these.

They are explained in great detail in the Chan links, the site and the images of the site. The truth is that the Gulftainer deal, the Uranium One deal and the Skolkovo project are all compartments of the same scam that George Tenet has to have signed off on.

Interesting about the /v/webofslime links.

http://archive.fo/jTVmf

http://archive.fo/krBzo

http://archive.fo/01bs8

If it is a persistent problem, I can replace them with the archive links.

I think you would need to add your footnote no. 8 (about the costs of buying a vote on Reddit).

It is included in the text, the menu is from upvotes dot club which is hard banned on Voat. As a result, the image is included in the various versions of the texts.

I also had to leave out quite a few other hard banned links, even to my own articles from 2016 that show I have been right since day 1.

4) The Art of the Limited Hang Out Part I: https://files.catbox.moe/0nyhv4.png

Same problem as above: Footnotes that would back up your info, and explain where you got the pics from are not visible.

The links from the articles are all scraped and included and the explanation are in the imaged texts. My articles are like 100 pages. I can't imagine they need more explanation relative to every other post in Pizzagate.

I'd suggest to directly link to your website, like you do with the info below.

(https://webofslime.com/tgd)

(https://webofslime.com/tgc)

This would solve the footnote problem.

Those are, indeed, included and I made the text big to draw attention. I might be misunderstanding what you are saying. Do I have it right?

These links would require a short description:

Slime: https://i.imgur.com/DgRLpJa.jpgJPG JPG · 1788 x 1006 Open

Slime: https://i.imgur.com/OAYvUcN.pngPNG PNG · 1012 x 247 Open

Slime: https://i.imgur.com/f3eM1Hr.jpgJPG

Slime: https://i.imgur.com/ynnCE2x.pngPNG

...and if possible, a link to the original site where you got them from.

I explain in the Introduction what they are. They came from me. I made them in paint.net. "Slime Spells."

If you have a Veterans Today link, the post might get flaired the post 'Possible Disinfo'.

I use other articles to back up what it is saying and the primary purpose was to highlight the arrest of one particular individual. I actually didn't include this specific information to spoon feed people because it rapidly becomes a wild tangent. But take notice about the Executive Order that was just past about EMP. I feel these stories are related. But, again, I only have so many characters to work with. I just didn't want to distract too much, but it is there for people who have been paying attention. All media is limited hangout. They are going to put fake stuff in with real stuff to discredit what they hate the most. It is up to researchers to verify which assertions are which.

My target audience is smart people. I gave up on trying to communicate with stupid people unless I am trying to figure out if they are a shill or not.

I make actual money by spotting what shills are promoting or hating on and it doesn't have to have anything to do with politics. I watch a lot of subjects and attempt to measure their impressions. Politics is a hobby, anti-shilling has made me... not rich... but pretty well off.

Rest looks fine to me.

Thanks for looking it over.

@think-

@vindicator