https://kek.gg/i/mrz8X.jpeg
If you havent seen this, it proves it is not a forgery. Thanks to @MrShekelstein for posting it here
Adjusting certain values and color channels(among other tools) in photoshop you can usually spot artifacts that would reveal forgery. It's extremely difficult to edit a photo where the added layers will change in the same exact way as the rest of the image.
If this image was fake you'd likely see some strange edges or discoloring that would really stand out in the edited areas. Which in this case would most likely be the faces in the photo.
Since these images have the same effect evenly distributed across the entire photo, with no weird portions standing out in anyway, it's very likely the image is real. Though it's hard to know what kind of image faking technology exists. This is a very simple and common way of spotting photoshopped images.
Great explanation by @crashing_this_thread
Article worth reading, focus on sources, not opinions.
Archive of the instagram post, proving it is real.
Infographic done by anons on /qresearch/.
I think it is now safe to assume the image is not fake/photoshop.
NOTE
I would first like to apologize for x-posting. I know there are some users who browse only this subverse so just in case they dont miss it, I will post here too. I also want to apologize to users who I double-pinged right now, I do not want to take credit away from you.
This is my response to the previous posts by a certain user of questionable integrity who claims this is photoshop.
edit: sliding fuckery in the comments
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2596487/13057956
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/17/barack-hussein-and-the-cabals-dancingboys-newq-qanon-greatawakening/
edit:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2596487/13068187
Not Hussein, I repeat, it is not Hussein. Why is Hussein's friend, Arthur Davis standing next to a Moloch looking guy? Really makes you hmmmmmm
view the rest of the comments →
GreenDell144 ago
I think everyone that has been working on this, whether on one side of the debate, or the other, has done a fine work and made very worthy arguments. This work is done as a service to us, for our consideration, and I appreciate it. OP, thank you for this post and the tactful aplomb in which you delivered it.
Now, that said, I hope we move forward. Given the times this has been debunked and then ‘bunked’ again, I have to ask: How comfortable are we that this is legit? I’m comfortable with this explanation, and I’m for sure certain that is Obama dressed as a high priest of Ashtoreth or Molochh.
risewithoutfear ago
I usually only see fierce down-voting in posts when you the posters are right on the money!
I myself found some of my own obviously-shopped images and ran them through some tests..... now, fotoforensics (after I figured out what I was looking for by way of looking at several of my own through the service) and other basic photoshop tests I ran indicate this image? Is NOT shopped.
To the asshole saying that 'but look at Obama's smile!! it's the same as another picture!' well, to that numpty I say this: well no shit, Einstein, that's what happens when people smile! They look like every other picture of them smiling! He also raged his tits off about "the collar" and that area is vastly different between images.
But you know what, I'll bite. I'll photoshop the second image into the first and see how we get on.
GreenDell144 ago
I was interested mildly at first, but I didn’t think it was a big deal. People don’t seem to care about these witchcraft/Satanism exposures...
But now I’m starting to think it IS a big deal (it was always a big deal for me, but the masses are apathetic). Maybe if we keep hammering, the sleeping hormones will wake up to the fact that the people that they ALLOW to rule them are monstrous.
EDIT: I’m no expert, but it seems reasonably real. This last proof from dooob seems helpful.