You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:

  • bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
  • gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
  • who was a gay crown prosecutor
  • who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
  • This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault

That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.

Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:

hojuruku ago

Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles. THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it.

Point 2) Read the link for the sentancing of Dr Patrick Power Crown prosecutor I QUOTED IN THE OP

Point 3) See point 2 and the link that has is name in it above the quote

Point 4) See point 2 patrick power - see link to him on committee that first asked to make the gay panic defence a "gay rights issue" then see the case of the law being succesfully used in legal studies if you google "gay panic defence australia'. There are cases of children getting of murder because they were resisting a gay child rape attempt

Point 5) the link in the OP to the judge ruling the child had the crush on the gay dad. Courier mail link

All claims substantiated in the OP. Try again mate. No hard feelings. You'll keep me honest. You know if you were sincerely not understanding I'd be really greatful because my goal is to be more effective communicator.

GreenDell144 ago

I think that we are trying to keep a good record of everything that we put here, and form a complete and informative pictur.

@vindicator, you quoted these elements of the post:

“bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn who was a gay crown prosecutor who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense. This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault”

So, are you saying, that a LINK to something needs to be with each point?

This is done so that reader’s can see we are talking about something real, right?

So it could be better if it looked like this: bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys https://www.deseretnews.com/article/865675155/Big-Brothers-Big-Sisters-accused-of-allowing-sex-abuse.html

As a READER (that is my primary role here, IMO), I like this strategy. It helps me understand and digest these events in small pieces.

A shocking and horrid event may be a certain and established fact, but I may have never heard of it, so I need to catch up, as I read a post that connects to it.

Your work, hojoruku, ALWAYS gets my attention, but I often get stuck in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph, because I don’t understand the context of what you are writing about. It’s frustrating, because you write SO MUCH. Too much for us to read in large quantities like that. It appears like an angry rant and you lose your audience.

These small efforts to post links helps your readers so you don’t lose us. You are writing for a reason. Don’t waste your efforts.

I think vin is trying to help you.

Vindicator ago

So, are you saying, that a LINK to something needs to be with each point?

When there are many claims like this, absolutely. Otherwise, it's open season in here -- unfriendlies are free to post long, complicated baffle-with-bullshit posts with dozens of links to waste mod time and energy and slide legit content right off the board.

@hojuruku

hojuruku ago

Vin I think you are my most liked mod friendly mod here, so if you nix this thread. i'm gone.

I have to find somewhere better at fighting these real pedophile judicial pedophilia normalization gang I'm going after in Australia.

I don't want all this mod vs original shitposter stuff here. When I get back from my trip to the all night banh me shops and some nicotine...

I am NOT GOING TO CHANGE A FRIGGEN WORD OR LINK IN THE OP. But i will try and RE-ARRANGE SOME OF THE LINKS CLOSER to SOME OF THE CLAIMS MADE THEY BACK UP.

That's all I can do with the limited 10,000 character limit and no room for formatting changes.

As for the first post of yours that may have been rushed (mod pressure). I don't want my lesser of all evils mod her to have his credibility in doubt.

Really this will be good for us if we all stand down after that EXTREMELY MINOR COSMETIC FIX I do to my post. We all save face then the comment space has just got related news stories - a collection of 1000s of gay child sex in jewish care big brothers big sister news story and user generated content where everyone digs up similar MSM stories. Let's get back to fighting pedophiles rather than with each-other.

Seriously.... I'm not being an arse but I' am being assertive. Sorry Vin you are wrong this time. It happens people rush and pull the trigger too quickly with too many posts to process. No hard feelings. Really mate I want you to delete (and me to delete) this whole comment thread and references to it because I don't want my favorite mod turning into another MF clusterfuck. NOOOO not again. Please - I need to use this site as a platform to get my research out. If I can't do it and it has to be shut down because some pedophiles must have any criticism of them shut down because it's "anti-. semetic" This is my first post on the Jewish pedophile links to the gay lobby i'm fighting. The first one to Garry Burns was aleph.org.au Michael Barnett. Now there is literally about 40 Jewish tie-ins to the pedophile group I"m after now.

I only followed the evidence. I didn't start out this way. I was a PC leftist in Australia before my persecution waked me up to the fact of what the left was. Like you go to vegas one day I got drunk and found the next morning I jouned Socialist Alliance - the same group that was Standing with Lee Rhiannon with their sign praising the FBI infant sex fugitive Dr Matthew Hynd's right as a pedophile to bring his mate into the country on a gay partner visa - because what we need is to help pedophiles +1 their mates into the country or you area homophone. Chasing the truth turned me into what I am. No white nationalist - typical one - would want to be seen dead admitting they once joined SA... Also Marrying Asians is a big no no.

Listen to them give me shit about it for hours here: http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/twos-company-threes-allowed-luke-mckee-4-7-16/

I'm finding this not because I hate jews. But because the evidence is taking me there.

And still you censor my post.

Crensch ago

Vin I think you are my most liked mod friendly mod here, so if you nix this thread. i'm gone.

Given what I've seen just here, you won't be missed.

Source your claims, retard. It's not really that difficult, and it helps literally everyone else that reads your shit to be able to confirm your words instead of each one having to do the work, if they even believe you in the first place. If you can't be bothered to put in the time and effort on your own posts to support your arguments, then your words probably aren't really that important anyway.

hojuruku ago

I sourced them all.

The claims @Vindicator said weren't sourced were ALL SOURCED in the OP. Tell me which one HE said wasn't and I'll debunk you.

You call me a retard - you shoot the messenger but you don't want to stick to the message and the FACTS in the OP.

Crensch ago

I sourced them all.

Liar.

The claims @Vindicator said weren't sourced were ALL SOURCED in the OP. Tell me which one HE said wasn't and I'll debunk you.

This one

You call me a retard - you shoot the messenger but you don't want to stick to the message and the FACTS in the OP.

I call people acting like retards retards. Stop acting like one, and maybe you won't get the label.

FACT: You're a liar.

hojuruku ago

Where is your sources to a LIE in the OP.

You got to give sources not claims without sources. Hypocrite mods.

hojuruku ago

@sigmawarrior was right.