@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
who was a gay crown prosecutor
who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles. THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it.
Point 2) Read the link for the sentancing of Dr Patrick Power Crown prosecutor I QUOTED IN THE OP
Point 3) See point 2 and the link that has is name in it above the quote
Point 4) See point 2 patrick power - see link to him on committee that first asked to make the gay panic defence a "gay rights issue" then see the case of the law being succesfully used in legal studies if you google "gay panic defence australia'. There are cases of children getting of murder because they were resisting a gay child rape attempt
Point 5) the link in the OP to the judge ruling the child had the crush on the gay dad. Courier mail link
All claims substantiated in the OP. Try again mate. No hard feelings. You'll keep me honest. You know if you were sincerely not understanding I'd be really greatful because my goal is to be more effective communicator.
Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles.
You didn't link to the Google search results or state that was the basis of your claim.
THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it. I can't link to them due to keyword censorship so I put it in this comment https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2497273/12472932 that has a link to a pastebin already provided before you brought me up on this
Evidence link has to be in the post, either right next to the claim, or as an embedded url made by highlighting the words of the claim itself so it's clear what link supports what claim. Especially in complex multi-claim threads like this.
Evidence link has to be in the post, either right next to the claim, or as an embedded url made by highlighting the words of the claim itself so it's clear what link supports what claim.
It is a battle to get it all in to 10,000 words. Trust me the links to prove all the things are doubting are there if you click on them. Please remove the 24 hour hold or say what claim you say isn't proven.
Next time I'll try and use more control codes but literally I had to move things out of the post like the WND link into comments because it was too big. There is no space for formatting codes so click on the links to see all the claims in the text are backed up by a link that is near them. Now instead of people reading news stories about Big Brothers big sisters in America and their wave of same sex child abuse almost worse than boy scouts of America etc in the comments and sharing that we have this pointless re-hasing of the OP. Please there is no free characters to fix formatting. Get VOAT to increase OP post size if you want nicer formatting.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
hojuruku ago
Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles. THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it.
Point 2) Read the link for the sentancing of Dr Patrick Power Crown prosecutor I QUOTED IN THE OP
Point 3) See point 2 and the link that has is name in it above the quote
Point 4) See point 2 patrick power - see link to him on committee that first asked to make the gay panic defence a "gay rights issue" then see the case of the law being succesfully used in legal studies if you google "gay panic defence australia'. There are cases of children getting of murder because they were resisting a gay child rape attempt
Point 5) the link in the OP to the judge ruling the child had the crush on the gay dad. Courier mail link
All claims substantiated in the OP. Try again mate. No hard feelings. You'll keep me honest. You know if you were sincerely not understanding I'd be really greatful because my goal is to be more effective communicator.
Vindicator ago
You didn't link to the Google search results or state that was the basis of your claim.
Evidence link has to be in the post, either right next to the claim, or as an embedded url made by highlighting the words of the claim itself so it's clear what link supports what claim. Especially in complex multi-claim threads like this.
think- ago
This.
@hojuruku - please consider what @Vindicator said above. Thank you.
@kevdude
hojuruku ago
It is a battle to get it all in to 10,000 words. Trust me the links to prove all the things are doubting are there if you click on them. Please remove the 24 hour hold or say what claim you say isn't proven.
Next time I'll try and use more control codes but literally I had to move things out of the post like the WND link into comments because it was too big. There is no space for formatting codes so click on the links to see all the claims in the text are backed up by a link that is near them. Now instead of people reading news stories about Big Brothers big sisters in America and their wave of same sex child abuse almost worse than boy scouts of America etc in the comments and sharing that we have this pointless re-hasing of the OP. Please there is no free characters to fix formatting. Get VOAT to increase OP post size if you want nicer formatting.