@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
who was a gay crown prosecutor
who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles. THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it.
Point 2) Read the link for the sentancing of Dr Patrick Power Crown prosecutor I QUOTED IN THE OP
Point 3) See point 2 and the link that has is name in it above the quote
Point 4) See point 2 patrick power - see link to him on committee that first asked to make the gay panic defence a "gay rights issue" then see the case of the law being succesfully used in legal studies if you google "gay panic defence australia'. There are cases of children getting of murder because they were resisting a gay child rape attempt
Point 5) the link in the OP to the judge ruling the child had the crush on the gay dad. Courier mail link
All claims substantiated in the OP. Try again mate. No hard feelings. You'll keep me honest. You know if you were sincerely not understanding I'd be really greatful because my goal is to be more effective communicator.
I think that we are trying to keep a good record of everything that we put here, and form a complete and informative pictur.
@vindicator, you quoted these elements of the post:
“bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
who was a gay crown prosecutor
who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault”
So, are you saying, that a LINK to something needs to be with each point?
This is done so that reader’s can see we are talking about something real, right?
As a READER (that is my primary role here, IMO), I like this strategy. It helps me understand and digest these events in small pieces.
A shocking and horrid event may be a certain and established fact, but I may have never heard of it, so I need to catch up, as I read a post that connects to it.
Your work, hojoruku, ALWAYS gets my attention, but I often get stuck in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph, because I don’t understand the context of what you are writing about. It’s frustrating, because you write SO MUCH. Too much for us to read in large quantities like that. It appears like an angry rant and you lose your audience.
These small efforts to post links helps your readers so you don’t lose us. You are writing for a reason. Don’t waste your efforts.
Your work, hojoruku, ALWAYS gets my attention, but I often get stuck in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph, because I don’t understand the context of what you are writing about.
I think vin is trying to help you.
Thank you, @GreenDell144. I can only hope OP will take this to his heart.
I am more worried about the evil he seems to be uncovering and the victims he is speaking about. I have this gut feeling that he’s exposed something nasty AND that maybe we can do something about it.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
hojuruku ago
Point 1) Google "big brothers big sisters" pedophile. You get a long list of homosexual pedophiles. THEY MADE A POLICY THEY ONLY WANT GAY MENTORS FOR KIDS IN 2002 and WND and others covered it.
Point 2) Read the link for the sentancing of Dr Patrick Power Crown prosecutor I QUOTED IN THE OP
Point 3) See point 2 and the link that has is name in it above the quote
Point 4) See point 2 patrick power - see link to him on committee that first asked to make the gay panic defence a "gay rights issue" then see the case of the law being succesfully used in legal studies if you google "gay panic defence australia'. There are cases of children getting of murder because they were resisting a gay child rape attempt
Point 5) the link in the OP to the judge ruling the child had the crush on the gay dad. Courier mail link
All claims substantiated in the OP. Try again mate. No hard feelings. You'll keep me honest. You know if you were sincerely not understanding I'd be really greatful because my goal is to be more effective communicator.
GreenDell144 ago
I think that we are trying to keep a good record of everything that we put here, and form a complete and informative pictur.
@vindicator, you quoted these elements of the post:
“bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn who was a gay crown prosecutor who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense. This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault”
So, are you saying, that a LINK to something needs to be with each point?
This is done so that reader’s can see we are talking about something real, right?
So it could be better if it looked like this: bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys https://www.deseretnews.com/article/865675155/Big-Brothers-Big-Sisters-accused-of-allowing-sex-abuse.html
As a READER (that is my primary role here, IMO), I like this strategy. It helps me understand and digest these events in small pieces.
A shocking and horrid event may be a certain and established fact, but I may have never heard of it, so I need to catch up, as I read a post that connects to it.
Your work, hojoruku, ALWAYS gets my attention, but I often get stuck in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph, because I don’t understand the context of what you are writing about. It’s frustrating, because you write SO MUCH. Too much for us to read in large quantities like that. It appears like an angry rant and you lose your audience.
These small efforts to post links helps your readers so you don’t lose us. You are writing for a reason. Don’t waste your efforts.
I think vin is trying to help you.
think- ago
Thank you, @GreenDell144. I can only hope OP will take this to his heart.
@Vindicator @kevdude
GreenDell144 ago
I am more worried about the evil he seems to be uncovering and the victims he is speaking about. I have this gut feeling that he’s exposed something nasty AND that maybe we can do something about it.