@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
who was a gay crown prosecutor
who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
you got an upvote. i want everyone to see my reply and give you a second opinion on it for 24 hours.
Don't insta-delete this thread or I'll loose faith in this forum when I try hard do it right and still I get bogus complains when all your questions were substantiated in the OP.
You are trying very hard flagging 3 of my posts in the space of 5 mins. You are a real keyboard warrior i thought I typed fast. I wont screenshot my notifications others can see the dates.
Without anger I refute everything you said above. Everyone can clearly see all things you doubt have been proven have been proven by links in the OP.
hojuruku, I am not trying to censor you. The exact opposite, in fact. Your approach to writing has the effect of burying your essential message and valuable research under layers of non-essential name calling. I get that you are pissed at the corrupt system. Shit, dude, WE ALL ARE! That's why we are here trying to eviscerate them with the facts. If you would rather rant without supporting links, we've got a subverse for that. But here in the research sub, we want to stick with what can be sourced.
You are trying very hard flagging 3 of my posts in the space of 5 mins. You are a real keyboard warrior i thought I typed fast. I wont screenshot my notifications others can see the dates.
Yes, after flairing several of your posts since @kevdude unbanned you, and explaining what you needed to do to post here, then seeing this thread today where you ignored everything we have asked, I looked at your submissions and saw this was a pattern. Several of your posts were downvoted to the point where I did not see them on the board during my shift. So I left a comment, flaired, etc. as needed this morning. Users expect mods here to be consistent. That is what I am doing.
Don't insta-delete this thread
I flaired it, and hope you will take advantage of the 24 hour opportunity to either provide linked sourced for all of the unsourced claims or edit the post to remove them and just write what you have evidence for.
so it's a secret 24 hour notice and no tag on the post subject line so I think everything ok and it's gets deleted?
And when you do ad that tag please ad a new comment saying you did it and my response to you to prove the claims you say weren't substantiated in the OP actually were and that the person saying they weren't substantiated lacked the comprehension because they didn't click on all the links.
If you clicked on any of the links before flagging it you couldn't have wrote what you wrote. It's ok. Mods are swamped. I criticized OTO child sex cult 24 hour notice censorship on another thread you reacted damn quickly. But please for you sake don't make your stand on this thread taking it down. It will be worse than @Millenial_Falcon all over again. I don't need to threaten you, the truth speaks for itself.
Nobody wants a war and more factional deterioration of pizzagate again. We are still recovering from the last mod who censored too much.
What I am saying sir is pick your battles carefully. There is no way you can come out of this without looking like you have in-proprietary. You haven't crossed the line yet - I'm asking you please don't and confirm all claims you claimed were unproven were really infact proven based on the links in the OP and the fact if you google "big brothers big sisters" pedophilia only cases of boys being raped under Jewish care comes up for the first few pages of google search results. If heterosexual pedophiles as 98% of the population who do 66% of the abuse are 90% of the pedophile population you would why is there such a cluster of gay pedophiles in Big Brothers Big Sisters eh? You think more stories of big brothers big sisters raping girls too would come up not just gay men in the news?
so it's a secret 24 hour notice and no tag on the post subject line so I think everything ok and it's gets deleted?
And when you do ad that tag please ad a new comment saying you did it
There's nothing secret about it, Hojuruku. I never leave a flair without a comment. Not one time in the entire year+ I've been modding. I not only comment, I usually comment with a ping to the OP so the notification shows up in both his Submission Replies and Comment Mentions.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:
That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.
Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:
hojuruku ago
you got an upvote. i want everyone to see my reply and give you a second opinion on it for 24 hours. Don't insta-delete this thread or I'll loose faith in this forum when I try hard do it right and still I get bogus complains when all your questions were substantiated in the OP.
You are trying very hard flagging 3 of my posts in the space of 5 mins. You are a real keyboard warrior i thought I typed fast. I wont screenshot my notifications others can see the dates.
Without anger I refute everything you said above. Everyone can clearly see all things you doubt have been proven have been proven by links in the OP.
Vindicator ago
hojuruku, I am not trying to censor you. The exact opposite, in fact. Your approach to writing has the effect of burying your essential message and valuable research under layers of non-essential name calling. I get that you are pissed at the corrupt system. Shit, dude, WE ALL ARE! That's why we are here trying to eviscerate them with the facts. If you would rather rant without supporting links, we've got a subverse for that. But here in the research sub, we want to stick with what can be sourced.
Yes, after flairing several of your posts since @kevdude unbanned you, and explaining what you needed to do to post here, then seeing this thread today where you ignored everything we have asked, I looked at your submissions and saw this was a pattern. Several of your posts were downvoted to the point where I did not see them on the board during my shift. So I left a comment, flaired, etc. as needed this morning. Users expect mods here to be consistent. That is what I am doing.
I flaired it, and hope you will take advantage of the 24 hour opportunity to either provide linked sourced for all of the unsourced claims or edit the post to remove them and just write what you have evidence for.
hojuruku ago
so it's a secret 24 hour notice and no tag on the post subject line so I think everything ok and it's gets deleted?
And when you do ad that tag please ad a new comment saying you did it and my response to you to prove the claims you say weren't substantiated in the OP actually were and that the person saying they weren't substantiated lacked the comprehension because they didn't click on all the links.
If you clicked on any of the links before flagging it you couldn't have wrote what you wrote. It's ok. Mods are swamped. I criticized OTO child sex cult 24 hour notice censorship on another thread you reacted damn quickly. But please for you sake don't make your stand on this thread taking it down. It will be worse than @Millenial_Falcon all over again. I don't need to threaten you, the truth speaks for itself.
Nobody wants a war and more factional deterioration of pizzagate again. We are still recovering from the last mod who censored too much.
What I am saying sir is pick your battles carefully. There is no way you can come out of this without looking like you have in-proprietary. You haven't crossed the line yet - I'm asking you please don't and confirm all claims you claimed were unproven were really infact proven based on the links in the OP and the fact if you google "big brothers big sisters" pedophilia only cases of boys being raped under Jewish care comes up for the first few pages of google search results. If heterosexual pedophiles as 98% of the population who do 66% of the abuse are 90% of the pedophile population you would why is there such a cluster of gay pedophiles in Big Brothers Big Sisters eh? You think more stories of big brothers big sisters raping girls too would come up not just gay men in the news?
Vindicator ago
There's nothing secret about it, Hojuruku. I never leave a flair without a comment. Not one time in the entire year+ I've been modding. I not only comment, I usually comment with a ping to the OP so the notification shows up in both his Submission Replies and Comment Mentions.