You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@ArtificialDuality: There is no reference to "Alice in Wonderland" in the QAnon leaks. It's "Alice and Wonderland". Have you actually read the leaks? Please cite some other references that make you think this is "controlled opposition." People are saying it's a LARP, but almost no one is claiming it's controlled. QAnon goes to great lengths to emphasize the problem is massive and worldwide and has required extreme measures of coordination to break the web of corruption. And confirmation that is happening has since come from Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe, and Lebanon.

ESOTERICshade ago

And Vin sometimes things are just what they are. Everybody was holding their breath for Trump's big speech. Q set everybody up for this big reveal. And the speech?


"Everything is great, the economy is great, less unemployment, stocks are up, everything is great, met with all these big leaders, fair trade, everything is great, more sanctions on NK, Chinese are great people...."


Not at all what was expected. Everybody expected martial law, electrical blackout, etc...at what point can a person start to be skeptical here without being a kill joy or suspected amalek shill?

srayzie ago

From what I understand, Q never made a big deal about Trumps upcoming speech. Some people were excited and had expectations and got disappointed. I would recommend watching Tracy Beanz on YouTube if you want to know more. She addressed this yesterday and has been covering this topic very well.

Vindicator ago

I would submit that those who expected that were those who did not actually examine the Q leaks, but were instead caught up in their own expectations. I did not expect it.

I saw this coming last night, as the expectation began to peak over his announcement tweet. It's very interesting that he deliberately did it, especially if Q is real. Why titillate only to disappoint? That's either the world's most inept communication/sales strategy, or a deliberate tactic employed for a particular reason. I'm not of the camp who thinks Trump is a retarded buffoon puppet, so option A is out. I am leaning toward the idea that this is another "covfeffe", a deliberate snafu designed to viralize discussion of a topic.

As for skepticism: it's easy. It takes no intellectual effort whatsoever to say "look at the new boss: same as the old boss." Nor does it get us anywhere. And it's boring. Why even log on, if that's what we're going to talk about? I don't want to mod a sub full of it, for sure.

It's much harder to seriously consider what might be new evidence, to envision how things could be done better than ever before, in a whole new way and how we could each contribute. That's challenging...but interesting to me.

ESOTERICshade ago

I am leaning toward the idea that this is another "covfeffe", a deliberate snafu designed to viralize discussion of a topic.

Well i'm give him some covfeffe then because that was a good un :)