Re-post after original, similar post deleted...
Dear VOAT lawyers, Judicial Watch, other judicial watchdogs, and concerned citizens
We, the people, need to get a motion filed in federal court to disqualify Steve Wasserman from the Awan criminal case. If you are not a lawyer, you can help contact one or Judicial Watch and encourage them to file one. Usually, the defense will file this motion when a prosecutor has a conflict of interest arising from becoming a necessary witness to the case. Usually, no one has to worry about a prosecutor who has a familial relation to the case because the prosecutor would automatically recuse themselves. Usually defense files the motion because they are the affected party of the conflict of interest. In this case, Wasserman would potentially be helping defense, so the affected party in "United States v. Awan" would be the United States. Thus, as a US citizen, any one of us would have standing to file this disqualification motion, no?
While I would happily file a motion, I refuse to dox myself. I already did a large portion of the work on a different thread (albeit, I used the USAG handbook as the rules referenced instead of caselaw).
-concerned Lawyer4Justice
Seek Justice brothers and sisters
As stated before, the Awan investigation has deep, potential ties to pizzagate. https://squawker.org/all/steven-wasserman-brother-of-debbie-wasserman-schultz-to-oversee-awan-family-investigation/
mooteensy ago
This is absolutely FUCKED.
Vindicator ago
Heads up @JrSlimms
WhyAserverWasBuilt ago
Amen
shtbh ago
Current Board Of Washington
DC Police Foundation:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1872032.
The ex wife of Tony Podesta is on this board. As is Lanny Breuer.
James C. Dinegar is on the board. He is with The Greater Washington Board Of Trade.
Thank you @privatepizza
Here is their web address:
http://www.dcpolicefoundation.org
Wow slim pickings for a website. It is almost a complete nothing-burger.
UglyTruth ago
Need is the basis of lawlessness.
The people of the constitution are not citizens, since they are responsible for the establishment of the system that citizens turn to for the protection of their rights. I agree that there's a valid case for the disqualification of Wasserman, but the question of standing is a little trickier because of the national security implications of the Awan case. AFAIK federal courts were only instituted for civil matters, so this may not be an appropriate venue.
Dressage2 ago
You learn right away that the important stuff is deleted and you need to look at that 1st thing when logging on.
mooteensy ago
How do I do this?
shtbh ago
To understand this topic, thinking this is is a 'must read'.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2030121
Thank you to:
@lawyer4justice
independenceday ago
Isn't there an obvious conflict of interest that should force him to recuse himself? How the hell did he end up in that position to begin with?
shtbh ago
Debbie's sibling?
What is that all about?
Big Crazy.
2impendingdoom ago
just don't link to the deleted submissions. Actually you can, everybody else does, but I told Vindicator that I would not do that anymore. I'm just glad to be un-banned. So much drama!
Vindicator ago
Linking to them is just fine -- it's reposting removed submissions without fixing them to comply that's the problem. We ban PGisStupid alts for that; we have to ban everyone who does it.
Solution: Post the link as a Comment, not a standalone thread. ;-) "Comments are Sacred".
lawyer4justice ago
Meh, i just copied and changed a little bit so it would fit that rule that was quoted regardless if i agreed or not. An extra hoop.. Whatevs
Good to have you back though
4warned ago
Will do! Thanks for the information.
Commoner ago
"We, the people, need to get a motion filed in federal court to disqualify Steve Wasserman from the Awan criminal case."
Funny, how that little detail about Debbie's brother is left out of all the talk about Seth Rich.
lawyer4justice ago
I mentioned that in a previous post i did on Reasonable Doubt and Seth Rich.