Re-post after original, similar post deleted...
Dear VOAT lawyers, Judicial Watch, other judicial watchdogs, and concerned citizens
We, the people, need to get a motion filed in federal court to disqualify Steve Wasserman from the Awan criminal case. If you are not a lawyer, you can help contact one or Judicial Watch and encourage them to file one. Usually, the defense will file this motion when a prosecutor has a conflict of interest arising from becoming a necessary witness to the case. Usually, no one has to worry about a prosecutor who has a familial relation to the case because the prosecutor would automatically recuse themselves. Usually defense files the motion because they are the affected party of the conflict of interest. In this case, Wasserman would potentially be helping defense, so the affected party in "United States v. Awan" would be the United States. Thus, as a US citizen, any one of us would have standing to file this disqualification motion, no?
While I would happily file a motion, I refuse to dox myself. I already did a large portion of the work on a different thread (albeit, I used the USAG handbook as the rules referenced instead of caselaw).
-concerned Lawyer4Justice
Seek Justice brothers and sisters
As stated before, the Awan investigation has deep, potential ties to pizzagate. https://squawker.org/all/steven-wasserman-brother-of-debbie-wasserman-schultz-to-oversee-awan-family-investigation/
view the rest of the comments →
UglyTruth ago
Need is the basis of lawlessness.
The people of the constitution are not citizens, since they are responsible for the establishment of the system that citizens turn to for the protection of their rights. I agree that there's a valid case for the disqualification of Wasserman, but the question of standing is a little trickier because of the national security implications of the Awan case. AFAIK federal courts were only instituted for civil matters, so this may not be an appropriate venue.