As Paul Harvey would say, and now for the rest of the Story.

S, just some background. This rwb character came here just after Alex Jones declared Comet pizza innocent and that pizzagate was bullshit. I was staring to warn people about Jones' many close ties to the CIA, and was attacked relentlessly by rwb, who actually became the first and only person on the Internet to claim he'd like to meet me in person, to teach me a lesson about how wrong I am concerning Alex Jones (later saying he was just so angry he couldn't help making the threat). This is probably a paid troll, and he's got a screw loose though his use of the English language is stellar. Just a warning to you.

As usual, V____Z manufactures facts to suit his purposes. I will now disassemble those facts one by one.

This rwb character came here just after Alex Jones declared Comet pizza innocent and that pizzagate was bullshit.

Voat only provides vague dates for old posts rounded out to the month, but sometimes google is our friend. Here’s proof that my first Voat post was on Feb 16 2017: The submission and the comment

Alex Jones made his on air retraction on Friday March 24 2017. See proof here: Media Matters on Jones retraction

In other words, V____Z claims I joined after the retraction perhaps as some kind of damage control, but the indisputable truth is I joined over five weeks before the time he claims. I would have to be inordinately prescient to join Voat five weeks before Jones's retraction in order to make V____Z's theory work. In addition, Jones never remotely backed off Podesta or Clinton. Edit: Upon further recollection, Jones started walking back on CPP prior to the on air retraction, but the fact remains he was all over CPP and Alefantis when the Podesta emails broke, and remained there for some time, that is until the players decided to put the boots to Jones to the exclusion of everyone else.

I was starting to warn people about Jones' many close ties to the CIA, and was attacked relentlessly by rwb,

Completely untrue. In fact, V____Z and I had a rather warm relationship for more than a month before I started to push back on his relentless attacks on Alex Jones, and if he denies it, I will publish our private correspondence. I reached out to V____Z by DM because I had been involved in a ferocious defense of David Seaman, and at some point noticed V____Z had also defended him. V____Z told me that he knew DS better than probably 99% of people at Voat because he had followed him on twitter for years before pizzagate broke. I asked him several questions about DS because of his much better knowledge of same, and I trusted V____Z for a time. I continued to defend DS as I had already done, but now armed with key information courtesy of V____Z. And even when I spotted the first critical comments about Jones from V____Z, I first reached out in private mail again, and very cordially defended Jones in a way that I thought would allow us to continue to contribute at Voat on mutually respectful terms. Then I discovered V____Z was on a mission to destroy Jones, and I was obligated to counter his program. Thus began the slow spiral downward. We have since had no less than eight run ins about Jones of one kind or another. One final comment in this regard. V____Z had already attacked Jones several times prior to our private conversation, but I was wholly unaware of this at the time.

who actually became the first and only person on the Internet to claim he'd like to meet me in person, to teach me a lesson about how wrong I am concerning Alex Jones (later saying he was just so angry he couldn't help making the threat).

This is perhaps true. V____Z ‘s relentless attacks on Jones and Infowars are at times so outrageous, he's actually moved me to subtly imply something like this, however, it should have been obvious that the practical chance of us ever meeting was infinitely small, so him taking me literally was hard to fathom.

This is probably a paid troll.

My efforts countering V____Z's program to destroy Jones does not remotely meet the standard of being a troll. And I’ll say it yet again, Jones couldn’t afford to pay me what I am worth. I defend Jones out of loyalty for his work shining light on the deep state/nwo/global elite and their crimes against humanity. Proof I'm not paid? As V____Z duly notes, my writing style is hard to mistake, and if I were actually on Jones’s payroll (thus technically the CIA’s payroll since V____Z thinks Jones is on their payroll) my work defending Jones would show up on other forums or internet venues. As it is, any sufficient google search using unique keywords I’ve used when defending Jones will indicate Voat is the only place where I have made such an effort.

he's got a screw loose

V____Z didn’t think I had a screw loose when we warmly discussed the outrageous attacks on David Seaman. V____Z has a thoroughly closed mind. When he told me he knew Seaman better than 99% of the people at Voat because he had followed him for such a long time, I took him at his word, yet V____Z will not remotely reciprocate even though I know Jones far better than he does, and have proven this with sheer logic time and again.

In spite of appearances, I don't despise V____Z. However, he is so misguided, I am constantly moved to respond in the strongest of terms. The preceding is perfect proof that he can and does get major facts wrong, and he's got virtually all the facts wrong not just about me, but about Alex Jones, a man who if given the opportunity would separate the sternum with his bare hands and tear the still beating heart out of anyone who would bring harm to a child. So would I. V____Z doesn't appreciate the fact that my life experience allows me to peer right into Jones's soul in a way he will never be able to. Jones has many faults, but suffering pedophiles is not and never will be one of them.