I think he's a disinfo agent, controlled opposition, a limited hangout, and when he says worked for the CIA, i think we should really realize the ramifications of that, given he has inserted himself into the pizzagate investigation seemingly from out of nowhere, he has been caught saying crazy things like, we could all get at least a million dollars by tweeting a certain hashtag. There are reasons to question anyone that has worked for the very organization being fingered by our investigation. The CIA.
He knows too much to not be in some way connected to IC. He might be a controlled info agent, hard to see dis-info. He is exposing many different branches of criminal mischief, and part of how they operated them. He is connecting pizzagate to the bigger story if you watch it - "Rat Lines" means all of em. Pizzagate is one piece (although fucking unacceptable and should be investigated) of the takeover of the US Government by power hungry, greedy, war mongers.
I definwlty wouldn't have used the term disinfo if he had not been caught saying untrue things. That is serious accusation. It's one that he hurled at David Seaman, in fact. I know that seaman does not tell untruths, regardless of anything else one could say about him, so I challenged George Webb to support his accusation which he made in a video seen by thousands, about a well known researcher who sticks closely to the Podesta emails in his assessment (something that can't be said about Webb). The thing is, he could not support his claim because it was bullshit. So he replied in a tweet "oh I should have said distraction". So suddenly seaman goes from being disinfo to a distraction? I'm not sure how you prove the latter, I think it's projection on webbs part, but I asked him to make the correction (since we are dealing with someone reputation here) in another video, rather than just a reply to a tweet that no one will see. This was back when I didn't know whether he was trustworthy or not. I know truth tellers, and a real truther would make sure to correct himself, and not in the way mainstream media does it, which is not at all, or hidden on the back page, I expected after all he praise being heaped on him that he would do the respectable thing. Can you guess what he did? He ignored me from there on out, and never corrected his slander. Not did he explain how seaman was a distraction. I don't consider talking about Podesta and the emails a distraction. I do consider talking about mangoes or papayas and the rest of the weird and random stuff he talks about to be the epitome of distraction.
I also think it's disinfo to tell his viewers that if hey tweet out a certain hashtag, he will find us that way and we all get at least a million dollars. I've never seen anyone defend that but they continue to defend him. Something very fishy here.
Honestly, I'm unfamiliar with the situation regarding your comments so I'll take you for your word. Specifically the million dollars or whatever. The Mossad is fully involved with the CIA in the master plan that is the Middle East. If he identifies rat lines operated by a specific group within the most powerful chambers of the US government, I'm all for him. Whether he tells everyone that the Mossad ran the brownstone operations in order to facilitate the coups can be exposed by other means. However, his exposing of criminal activity and hacking of the government is worthy of some credit.
That's not necessarily a bad thing if the CIA is going through a Civil War of sorts. I'm sure there are Good Guys in the CIA just as there are Good Guys at the FBI despite the fact both organizations are dripping in corruption.
Check his first post here on Voat where he put a link to his linked in page - all tech and data jobs. This is why there are so many questions about him.
I meant, is he one of the good guys, as your comment seems to imply. I think we've seen many signs he's not, and not to be trusted. Do you have an opinion about the subject of this post, the fact that he's leaking private information on people?
He's doing that because Andrew McCabe won't investigate. Andrew McCabe and James Comey are professional Deep State "slow walkers". They were put in those jobs to stifle any investigation that might lead to the Deep State committing a crime.
I guess that's my biggest problem with your position. You seem incapable of ascribing any guilt to the Deep State. It's kind of like me being reluctant to blame George Webb for dis-info. I appreciate you pointing out that George Webb may be controlled opposition meant to steer things away from Israel. You're right.
I'd expect you to be doing the same with Andrew McCabe and James Comey and the Deep State. But I've never seen you even mention them. All you mention is George Webb investigating Muslims. That's odd don't you think?
It's odd that you would make a statement about me without checking out the facts. Or maybe it's not odd, maybe it's the norm for you. In one of my most recent submissions, you will find mention of the actors you say i ignore: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1849772
Here's what I wrote: "I'd expect you to be doing the same with Andrew McCabe and James Comey and the Deep State."
I go here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1849772 to look for either Andrew McCabe or James Comey. Let's leave out Deep State because that's not an individual "actor".
And the verdict is: you mentioned neither Andrew McCabe nor James Comey.
Actually whatever the fuck your name is, it's odd that you would accuse me of not checking out the facts when I just "checked out the facts" and found I was right.
Bro "Why don't you try clickin gon that link again and read the first line" remember the fact you copied a fucking tweet.
Copying the title of a tweet isn't you expounding on why James Comey is a corrupt traitor who should be tried and convicted of Misprision of Treason and hung by the neck until dead now is it?
You need more of that colorful shit expressing your anger and righteous indignation at these mother fuckers. You know like I do. You have no passion in what you write. That smacks of shillary to me. When I read your writing all I think of is you're punching a clock, you're mailing it in if you will.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I think he's a disinfo agent, controlled opposition, a limited hangout, and when he says worked for the CIA, i think we should really realize the ramifications of that, given he has inserted himself into the pizzagate investigation seemingly from out of nowhere, he has been caught saying crazy things like, we could all get at least a million dollars by tweeting a certain hashtag. There are reasons to question anyone that has worked for the very organization being fingered by our investigation. The CIA.
4_InquiringMinds ago
Well fuck, there goes my retirement fund. Next you'll tell me there is no Santa Claus?
V____Z ago
Lol ;)
Awoke_AF ago
He knows too much to not be in some way connected to IC. He might be a controlled info agent, hard to see dis-info. He is exposing many different branches of criminal mischief, and part of how they operated them. He is connecting pizzagate to the bigger story if you watch it - "Rat Lines" means all of em. Pizzagate is one piece (although fucking unacceptable and should be investigated) of the takeover of the US Government by power hungry, greedy, war mongers.
V____Z ago
I definwlty wouldn't have used the term disinfo if he had not been caught saying untrue things. That is serious accusation. It's one that he hurled at David Seaman, in fact. I know that seaman does not tell untruths, regardless of anything else one could say about him, so I challenged George Webb to support his accusation which he made in a video seen by thousands, about a well known researcher who sticks closely to the Podesta emails in his assessment (something that can't be said about Webb). The thing is, he could not support his claim because it was bullshit. So he replied in a tweet "oh I should have said distraction". So suddenly seaman goes from being disinfo to a distraction? I'm not sure how you prove the latter, I think it's projection on webbs part, but I asked him to make the correction (since we are dealing with someone reputation here) in another video, rather than just a reply to a tweet that no one will see. This was back when I didn't know whether he was trustworthy or not. I know truth tellers, and a real truther would make sure to correct himself, and not in the way mainstream media does it, which is not at all, or hidden on the back page, I expected after all he praise being heaped on him that he would do the respectable thing. Can you guess what he did? He ignored me from there on out, and never corrected his slander. Not did he explain how seaman was a distraction. I don't consider talking about Podesta and the emails a distraction. I do consider talking about mangoes or papayas and the rest of the weird and random stuff he talks about to be the epitome of distraction.
I also think it's disinfo to tell his viewers that if hey tweet out a certain hashtag, he will find us that way and we all get at least a million dollars. I've never seen anyone defend that but they continue to defend him. Something very fishy here.
Awoke_AF ago
Honestly, I'm unfamiliar with the situation regarding your comments so I'll take you for your word. Specifically the million dollars or whatever. The Mossad is fully involved with the CIA in the master plan that is the Middle East. If he identifies rat lines operated by a specific group within the most powerful chambers of the US government, I'm all for him. Whether he tells everyone that the Mossad ran the brownstone operations in order to facilitate the coups can be exposed by other means. However, his exposing of criminal activity and hacking of the government is worthy of some credit.
DarkMath ago
"he says worked for the CIA"
That's not necessarily a bad thing if the CIA is going through a Civil War of sorts. I'm sure there are Good Guys in the CIA just as there are Good Guys at the FBI despite the fact both organizations are dripping in corruption.
seekingpeace ago
Check his first post here on Voat where he put a link to his linked in page - all tech and data jobs. This is why there are so many questions about him.
DarkMath ago
" all tech and data jobs"
All linked in pages have those. George Webb posted the linked in page to prove he's real. That's all that is.
seekingpeace ago
So all those jobs he listed are not real? Is that what you're saying or am I missing something?
DarkMath ago
"all those jobs"
You mean his Resume on LinkedIn or the adverts for jobs on LinkedIn?
V____Z ago
Sure, but is he one of them?
DarkMath ago
I don't know if he's CIA. I'm not even sure if he's mossad. Maybe he's just one guy taking on the world.
V____Z ago
I meant, is he one of the good guys, as your comment seems to imply. I think we've seen many signs he's not, and not to be trusted. Do you have an opinion about the subject of this post, the fact that he's leaking private information on people?
DarkMath ago
"leaking private information on people"
He's doing that because Andrew McCabe won't investigate. Andrew McCabe and James Comey are professional Deep State "slow walkers". They were put in those jobs to stifle any investigation that might lead to the Deep State committing a crime.
I guess that's my biggest problem with your position. You seem incapable of ascribing any guilt to the Deep State. It's kind of like me being reluctant to blame George Webb for dis-info. I appreciate you pointing out that George Webb may be controlled opposition meant to steer things away from Israel. You're right.
I'd expect you to be doing the same with Andrew McCabe and James Comey and the Deep State. But I've never seen you even mention them. All you mention is George Webb investigating Muslims. That's odd don't you think?
V____Z ago
It's odd that you would make a statement about me without checking out the facts. Or maybe it's not odd, maybe it's the norm for you. In one of my most recent submissions, you will find mention of the actors you say i ignore: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1849772
DarkMath ago
"you will find mention of the actors"
Fair enough, let me check the tape.
Here's what I wrote: "I'd expect you to be doing the same with Andrew McCabe and James Comey and the Deep State."
I go here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1849772 to look for either Andrew McCabe or James Comey. Let's leave out Deep State because that's not an individual "actor".
And the verdict is: you mentioned neither Andrew McCabe nor James Comey.
Actually whatever the fuck your name is, it's odd that you would accuse me of not checking out the facts when I just "checked out the facts" and found I was right.
What's up bro, why you taking me for a fool?
V____Z ago
Why don't you try clickin gon that link again and read the first line. OR better yet, here:
That was the first line. You're trippin bro.
DarkMath ago
Bro "Why don't you try clickin gon that link again and
read the first line" remember the fact you copied a fucking tweet.Copying the title of a tweet isn't you expounding on why James Comey is a corrupt traitor who should be tried and convicted of Misprision of Treason and hung by the neck until dead now is it?
You need more of that colorful shit expressing your anger and righteous indignation at these mother fuckers. You know like I do. You have no passion in what you write. That smacks of shillary to me. When I read your writing all I think of is you're punching a clock, you're mailing it in if you will.
:-D
V____Z ago
You are a straight up TRIP.