I think he's a disinfo agent, controlled opposition, a limited hangout, and when he says worked for the CIA, i think we should really realize the ramifications of that, given he has inserted himself into the pizzagate investigation seemingly from out of nowhere, he has been caught saying crazy things like, we could all get at least a million dollars by tweeting a certain hashtag. There are reasons to question anyone that has worked for the very organization being fingered by our investigation. The CIA.
He knows too much to not be in some way connected to IC. He might be a controlled info agent, hard to see dis-info. He is exposing many different branches of criminal mischief, and part of how they operated them. He is connecting pizzagate to the bigger story if you watch it - "Rat Lines" means all of em. Pizzagate is one piece (although fucking unacceptable and should be investigated) of the takeover of the US Government by power hungry, greedy, war mongers.
I definwlty wouldn't have used the term disinfo if he had not been caught saying untrue things. That is serious accusation. It's one that he hurled at David Seaman, in fact. I know that seaman does not tell untruths, regardless of anything else one could say about him, so I challenged George Webb to support his accusation which he made in a video seen by thousands, about a well known researcher who sticks closely to the Podesta emails in his assessment (something that can't be said about Webb). The thing is, he could not support his claim because it was bullshit. So he replied in a tweet "oh I should have said distraction". So suddenly seaman goes from being disinfo to a distraction? I'm not sure how you prove the latter, I think it's projection on webbs part, but I asked him to make the correction (since we are dealing with someone reputation here) in another video, rather than just a reply to a tweet that no one will see. This was back when I didn't know whether he was trustworthy or not. I know truth tellers, and a real truther would make sure to correct himself, and not in the way mainstream media does it, which is not at all, or hidden on the back page, I expected after all he praise being heaped on him that he would do the respectable thing. Can you guess what he did? He ignored me from there on out, and never corrected his slander. Not did he explain how seaman was a distraction. I don't consider talking about Podesta and the emails a distraction. I do consider talking about mangoes or papayas and the rest of the weird and random stuff he talks about to be the epitome of distraction.
I also think it's disinfo to tell his viewers that if hey tweet out a certain hashtag, he will find us that way and we all get at least a million dollars. I've never seen anyone defend that but they continue to defend him. Something very fishy here.
Honestly, I'm unfamiliar with the situation regarding your comments so I'll take you for your word. Specifically the million dollars or whatever. The Mossad is fully involved with the CIA in the master plan that is the Middle East. If he identifies rat lines operated by a specific group within the most powerful chambers of the US government, I'm all for him. Whether he tells everyone that the Mossad ran the brownstone operations in order to facilitate the coups can be exposed by other means. However, his exposing of criminal activity and hacking of the government is worthy of some credit.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I think he's a disinfo agent, controlled opposition, a limited hangout, and when he says worked for the CIA, i think we should really realize the ramifications of that, given he has inserted himself into the pizzagate investigation seemingly from out of nowhere, he has been caught saying crazy things like, we could all get at least a million dollars by tweeting a certain hashtag. There are reasons to question anyone that has worked for the very organization being fingered by our investigation. The CIA.
Awoke_AF ago
He knows too much to not be in some way connected to IC. He might be a controlled info agent, hard to see dis-info. He is exposing many different branches of criminal mischief, and part of how they operated them. He is connecting pizzagate to the bigger story if you watch it - "Rat Lines" means all of em. Pizzagate is one piece (although fucking unacceptable and should be investigated) of the takeover of the US Government by power hungry, greedy, war mongers.
V____Z ago
I definwlty wouldn't have used the term disinfo if he had not been caught saying untrue things. That is serious accusation. It's one that he hurled at David Seaman, in fact. I know that seaman does not tell untruths, regardless of anything else one could say about him, so I challenged George Webb to support his accusation which he made in a video seen by thousands, about a well known researcher who sticks closely to the Podesta emails in his assessment (something that can't be said about Webb). The thing is, he could not support his claim because it was bullshit. So he replied in a tweet "oh I should have said distraction". So suddenly seaman goes from being disinfo to a distraction? I'm not sure how you prove the latter, I think it's projection on webbs part, but I asked him to make the correction (since we are dealing with someone reputation here) in another video, rather than just a reply to a tweet that no one will see. This was back when I didn't know whether he was trustworthy or not. I know truth tellers, and a real truther would make sure to correct himself, and not in the way mainstream media does it, which is not at all, or hidden on the back page, I expected after all he praise being heaped on him that he would do the respectable thing. Can you guess what he did? He ignored me from there on out, and never corrected his slander. Not did he explain how seaman was a distraction. I don't consider talking about Podesta and the emails a distraction. I do consider talking about mangoes or papayas and the rest of the weird and random stuff he talks about to be the epitome of distraction.
I also think it's disinfo to tell his viewers that if hey tweet out a certain hashtag, he will find us that way and we all get at least a million dollars. I've never seen anyone defend that but they continue to defend him. Something very fishy here.
Awoke_AF ago
Honestly, I'm unfamiliar with the situation regarding your comments so I'll take you for your word. Specifically the million dollars or whatever. The Mossad is fully involved with the CIA in the master plan that is the Middle East. If he identifies rat lines operated by a specific group within the most powerful chambers of the US government, I'm all for him. Whether he tells everyone that the Mossad ran the brownstone operations in order to facilitate the coups can be exposed by other means. However, his exposing of criminal activity and hacking of the government is worthy of some credit.