John Podesta, kids in a pool for entertainment, and 3 degrees of separation from child porn (the story in pictures)

John Podesta, kids in a pool for entertainment, and 3 degrees of separation from child porn (the story in pictures) (pizzagate)

submitted 8 years ago by V____Z

Since VOAT is more text-based, and a lot of our evidence is visual, I pasted together some of your comments along with the evidence, based on the great work from @pizzagater99 and @TruthSeeker710, as well as comments from @4TruthUnited, @GodWillWin, @GeorgeT and one of you who wanted to remain anonymous.

In this post is a breakdown of the "kids as entertainment" email, the "raw and uncut" comment from Evie's Blog, and finally the recent discovery of blatant solicitation of child porn on the blog recommended by Luzzatto.

Some of you have said this evidence should result in nothing less than immediate action by authorities.

https://occupyblogosphere.wordpress.com/2017/04/26/john-podesta-kids-in-a-pool-for-entertainment-and-3-degrees-of-separation-from-child-porn/

73 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

The_Crux 8 years ago

I don't know how you people come up with that interpretation that she's sending kids to a party to be raped by Podesta and other various Democrats. And you keep reposting this evil slander. I'm thinking it's the shill camp that keeps harping on this.

link

V____Z 8 years ago

Exactly where in the world did this post say what you're quoting?

link

The_Crux 8 years ago

What is the crux of your post? Are you saying that she wasn't sending the kids to the party to be raped by Democrats? What is the insinuation then? I destroy dumb-play specialists. It's my specialty.

link

V____Z 8 years ago

If I had anything to say beyond what is stated and shown in the post, I would have added it. If you want to ask me if I personally believe Podesta raped a child in the pool, I have to admit I've never really thought it that far through, and it wouldn't matter what I think anyway. The only thing I'm concerned with is the evidence, circumstantial and otherwise, that points to strange and concerning language being used with regard to children. And finally in the post we have actual evidence of a link to solicitation of child porn, or was that lost on you? Recognizing child porn is not part of your specialty?

link

The_Crux 8 years ago

So you have no insinuation about why she's sending the kids to that party but you made a post about it? But then you say you picked up something "strange" in the language that she used but you become bashful about explaining what that is once I make my charge about what you are insinuating. Wouldn't you say you are at least implying some shenanigans were going on with those children and the adults at that party? If you admit that then I'm gonna ask you what kind of shenanigans so be careful.