You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Northern_Soul ago

..MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH, VERY IMPORTANT.

FIRST, UNDER THE MICROSCOPE & THE AGENTS ATTACKING THIS STORY.

Agent No 1 @DarkMath - A "Podesta sympathizer" & "paid worker"

Agent No 2 @equineluvr - A "Big Bully" and a "General Idiot"

Agents - 1 , 2 & 3, ALL attacking upon a female user who's popular on this site, Because she truly speaks out for the innocent victims... Go over her submissions if you need convincing.


THE STORY

News Article, April 18th 2017....... http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/two-trey-gowdys-investigators-disappeared/

The reason their is such a surge to debunk this story can be found here again...

Article, March 16th, 2017 ..... * https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2017/03/16/who-they-wisconsins-missing-children/98347286/

Coincidence?? missing children lists...


"THE MISSING DETECTIVES?"

Reported missing people in MARCH 2017

  1. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?333214-WI-Krista-Sypher-44-Plover-13-March-2017 (READ THE RELATED COMMENTS)

Quote..

Plovermom79 Im a close personal friend of krista for over 17 yrs The article made me sick. This isnt her and she wouldnt leave her kids no matter what. Krista is a kind dedicated spunky mother and friend all of is that know her, know she would not walk.out quietly and disappear. My heart breaks for her kids, they are being lead to believe their mother left because of some bulls**t mental disorder story one person out there knows where she is and.i hope hes caught out!.

Quote...

MissEhrmann The family does not want help according to the Facebook page. It says: Look at her picture, have you seen her? If you have let us know, if you have not, please do not say anything. WOW! They have to know something they are not saying.

http://www.weau.com/content/news/Plover-Police-issue-statewide-alert-for-missing-woman-416851093.html (WATERED DOWN GOVERNMENT VERSION)


My fellow "brethren", "truth fighters", "mums", "dads", all the good people who have shred so many tears these past 6 months... We are the voice, We are the light, so lets make our selves heard... Lets finish what these brave people started, they can't silence us all.!!!

rwb ago

I have to disagree with your assessment. It is virtually impossible to prove someone who questions particular elements of pizzagate is a paid agent of deception or worse. PG now comprises perhaps hundreds of individual pieces of information, and like any complex theory, each of us builds an overall viewpoint on PG from these individual pieces, and that viewpoint will vary from person to person. Then what happens is we see someone disagree with one or more pieces of information we assume are a lock, and we automatically think paid agent or worse, but this is highly unreasonable because it is impossible for any two people to agree on all points, and it's ultimately not helpful to disturb the Voat community by calling people out even if one were to surmise correctly about any one or more persons playing for the other side. And you're not going to like this part, but it's now my estimation that the most likely candidates to be paid disinformation or worse are those who cause the most dissension, say by attacking Alex Jones, David Seaman, George Webb, or anyone of the like over and over again, and also those constantly leveling the charge of shill against others, which you of necessity would now fall into that category. I am not remotely implying you have nefarious intent, but just a heads up that this is usually the first thing that raises suspicion in me.

Look, the best thing you can do for yourself and for other Voat readers and contributors is to deep read someone's comment history, beginning, middle, and late period, to get a broader assessment of their worldview, and then formulate great responses to any posts which you find suspicious. And the irony is, if you're on the money about anyone playing for the other side, the clever reader will more readily accept what you might tacitly imply, rather than what you are now trying express explicitly.