The McCann lead is pushed frequently by shills and disinformation agents who usually "prove it" with something along the lines of "Podesta confirmed in Portugal at time of disappearance!" Except that was never confirmed. The link there is possible but not concrete.
The coincidence that she and Soros both have coloboma is just the sort of thing shills would latch onto to push the McCann narrative.
Gerry McCann tie in is pretty flimsy. You have to be able to see that.
Agreed that Soros funding Kushner is shitty but it doesn't tie in to pizzagate AT ALL.
Classic shill tactic of loosely associating things together to try to connect them in your mind and derail the conversation.
Thanks for the welcome. I lurked for a long time before making an account. so not really that new but appreciate the sentiment.
I haven't seen any serious debunking of the McCain connection, it has been discussed here in depth. It only leads to more questions. Can you show me where it has been debunked?
I didn't say it has been and I don't think it will be. I think it's an open lead that will likely not go anywhere and it's being pushed so that people focus on the wrong things.
I personally wonder why you're concerned about people focusing on the 'Wrong Things'. I would ask, who are you to decide what people focus on? And why you're so fast to disparage this research when it could be of interest?
I would say that it's not up to you to decide what people research. You say yourself that it's an OPEN LEAD. Why disparage the OP then?
Since it's all speculation, it's kind of hard to cite. I'm also not saying I think the mccann lead is a red herring. I do think that disinformation agents have picked up on it and turned it into a wild goose chase involving eye deformations, cloning, microchipping etc and that the affiliations are loose at best.
I appreciate your opinion, said like this, I really do. Personally I'm on the fence about this, but * circumstantial evidence * says we have something to look at. In this case, why shut down others research on it? Really, every little thing (info) helps, and we'll find out in the end what's correct. But to shut down others discussing it, who have obviously put time into posting, isn't maybe the best approach, as it dis-encourages others to look at it.
If we don't care about the subject, no problem! I for one wouldn't downvoat someone who IS caring, and possibly revealing new info.
view the rest of the comments →
keyboard12 ago
This is so obviously disinformation masking as a research post.
privatepizza ago
Can you give examples / sources on why this is a shill post and irrelevant to the investigation? I see you're pretty new here. Welcome.
keyboard12 ago
The McCann lead is pushed frequently by shills and disinformation agents who usually "prove it" with something along the lines of "Podesta confirmed in Portugal at time of disappearance!" Except that was never confirmed. The link there is possible but not concrete.
The coincidence that she and Soros both have coloboma is just the sort of thing shills would latch onto to push the McCann narrative. Gerry McCann tie in is pretty flimsy. You have to be able to see that.
Agreed that Soros funding Kushner is shitty but it doesn't tie in to pizzagate AT ALL.
Classic shill tactic of loosely associating things together to try to connect them in your mind and derail the conversation.
Thanks for the welcome. I lurked for a long time before making an account. so not really that new but appreciate the sentiment.
V____Z ago
I haven't seen any serious debunking of the McCain connection, it has been discussed here in depth. It only leads to more questions. Can you show me where it has been debunked?
keyboard12 ago
I didn't say it has been and I don't think it will be. I think it's an open lead that will likely not go anywhere and it's being pushed so that people focus on the wrong things.
privatepizza ago
I personally wonder why you're concerned about people focusing on the 'Wrong Things'. I would ask, who are you to decide what people focus on? And why you're so fast to disparage this research when it could be of interest?
I would say that it's not up to you to decide what people research. You say yourself that it's an OPEN LEAD. Why disparage the OP then?
keyboard12 ago
Should I also be limited in pointing out misdirection when I feel I see it?
privatepizza ago
NO ! Not at all, but give citations / counter arguments rather than insults, because doing this makes you look disingenuous at least.
keyboard12 ago
Since it's all speculation, it's kind of hard to cite. I'm also not saying I think the mccann lead is a red herring. I do think that disinformation agents have picked up on it and turned it into a wild goose chase involving eye deformations, cloning, microchipping etc and that the affiliations are loose at best.
privatepizza ago
I appreciate your opinion, said like this, I really do. Personally I'm on the fence about this, but * circumstantial evidence * says we have something to look at. In this case, why shut down others research on it? Really, every little thing (info) helps, and we'll find out in the end what's correct. But to shut down others discussing it, who have obviously put time into posting, isn't maybe the best approach, as it dis-encourages others to look at it.
If we don't care about the subject, no problem! I for one wouldn't downvoat someone who IS caring, and possibly revealing new info.
keyboard12 ago
Fair enough.
privatepizza ago
Cool, appreciate that.