The McCann lead is pushed frequently by shills and disinformation agents who usually "prove it" with something along the lines of "Podesta confirmed in Portugal at time of disappearance!" Except that was never confirmed. The link there is possible but not concrete.
The coincidence that she and Soros both have coloboma is just the sort of thing shills would latch onto to push the McCann narrative.
Gerry McCann tie in is pretty flimsy. You have to be able to see that.
Agreed that Soros funding Kushner is shitty but it doesn't tie in to pizzagate AT ALL.
Classic shill tactic of loosely associating things together to try to connect them in your mind and derail the conversation.
Thanks for the welcome. I lurked for a long time before making an account. so not really that new but appreciate the sentiment.
Thanks for explaining (why these are shills) ... I've no energy to do it. I love this line from their post (not):
tetrahydrocannabinol exposure. Such processes would be invaluable to scientists who wish to live forever, for if you are able to maintain telomere length, you can experience cell division indefinitely.
I haven't seen any serious debunking of the McCain connection, it has been discussed here in depth. It only leads to more questions. Can you show me where it has been debunked?
Shilling hard today, I think the op and keyboard12 are all participants in some story telling bunch of McCann Colombana stories spring up weak arguments and the shootdowns seem scripted. Dont entertain them with your time, heads up @privatepizza
Edit: re McCann theres definitely a story there just not this story
I didn't say it has been and I don't think it will be. I think it's an open lead that will likely not go anywhere and it's being pushed so that people focus on the wrong things.
I personally wonder why you're concerned about people focusing on the 'Wrong Things'. I would ask, who are you to decide what people focus on? And why you're so fast to disparage this research when it could be of interest?
I would say that it's not up to you to decide what people research. You say yourself that it's an OPEN LEAD. Why disparage the OP then?
Since it's all speculation, it's kind of hard to cite. I'm also not saying I think the mccann lead is a red herring. I do think that disinformation agents have picked up on it and turned it into a wild goose chase involving eye deformations, cloning, microchipping etc and that the affiliations are loose at best.
I appreciate your opinion, said like this, I really do. Personally I'm on the fence about this, but * circumstantial evidence * says we have something to look at. In this case, why shut down others research on it? Really, every little thing (info) helps, and we'll find out in the end what's correct. But to shut down others discussing it, who have obviously put time into posting, isn't maybe the best approach, as it dis-encourages others to look at it.
If we don't care about the subject, no problem! I for one wouldn't downvoat someone who IS caring, and possibly revealing new info.
To be citing Shill Tactics, you don't half display the appearance of one.
The McCann lead is pushed frequently by shills and disinformation agents who usually "prove it" with something along the lines of "Podesta confirmed in Portugal at time of disappearance!" Except that was never confirmed. The link there is possible but not concrete.
If it hasn't been proven, why disregard it?
The coincidence that she and Soros both have coloboma is just the sort of thing shills would latch onto to push the McCann narrative. Gerry McCann tie in is pretty flimsy. You have to be able to see that.
The amount of shilling on this subject may tell us, don't you think, what's really going on with this case? IF unproven, why are you so vehement in dis-crying it?
Agreed that Soros funding Kushner is shitty but it doesn't tie in to pizzagate AT ALL.
If you don't have concrete reasons why it doesn't tie in, why be shilling it?
Classic shill tactic of loosely associating things together to try to connect them in your mind and derail the conversation.
Far from 'loosely accociating things to try to connect them in our minds, we are joining the dots, if there are indeed any. Why put people off them when you have no concrete evidence to the contrary, other than disparaging genuine citizen investigators?
Thanks for the welcome. I lurked for a long time before making an account. so not really that new but appreciate the sentiment.
Yes well, I believe you but thousands wouldn't. With this shit you look like a paid shill-head. GTFO unless you've anything positive to say.
view the rest of the comments →
keyboard12 ago
This is so obviously disinformation masking as a research post.
privatepizza ago
Can you give examples / sources on why this is a shill post and irrelevant to the investigation? I see you're pretty new here. Welcome.
keyboard12 ago
The McCann lead is pushed frequently by shills and disinformation agents who usually "prove it" with something along the lines of "Podesta confirmed in Portugal at time of disappearance!" Except that was never confirmed. The link there is possible but not concrete.
The coincidence that she and Soros both have coloboma is just the sort of thing shills would latch onto to push the McCann narrative. Gerry McCann tie in is pretty flimsy. You have to be able to see that.
Agreed that Soros funding Kushner is shitty but it doesn't tie in to pizzagate AT ALL.
Classic shill tactic of loosely associating things together to try to connect them in your mind and derail the conversation.
Thanks for the welcome. I lurked for a long time before making an account. so not really that new but appreciate the sentiment.
HollandDrive ago
Thanks for explaining (why these are shills) ... I've no energy to do it. I love this line from their post (not):
Jem777 ago
It is so fascinating to watch people claim how smart they are then when big words are used they call someone disinfo. stunning.
The OP should have used crayons
HollandDrive ago
I didn't (nor don't) make any claims like that (being smart), maybe you're thinking of someone else?
V____Z ago
I haven't seen any serious debunking of the McCain connection, it has been discussed here in depth. It only leads to more questions. Can you show me where it has been debunked?
LostandFound ago
Shilling hard today, I think the op and keyboard12 are all participants in some story telling bunch of McCann Colombana stories spring up weak arguments and the shootdowns seem scripted. Dont entertain them with your time, heads up @privatepizza
Edit: re McCann theres definitely a story there just not this story
privatepizza ago
I'm hearin ya, thanks for the heads up ;)
keyboard12 ago
I didn't say it has been and I don't think it will be. I think it's an open lead that will likely not go anywhere and it's being pushed so that people focus on the wrong things.
privatepizza ago
I personally wonder why you're concerned about people focusing on the 'Wrong Things'. I would ask, who are you to decide what people focus on? And why you're so fast to disparage this research when it could be of interest?
I would say that it's not up to you to decide what people research. You say yourself that it's an OPEN LEAD. Why disparage the OP then?
keyboard12 ago
Should I also be limited in pointing out misdirection when I feel I see it?
privatepizza ago
NO ! Not at all, but give citations / counter arguments rather than insults, because doing this makes you look disingenuous at least.
keyboard12 ago
Since it's all speculation, it's kind of hard to cite. I'm also not saying I think the mccann lead is a red herring. I do think that disinformation agents have picked up on it and turned it into a wild goose chase involving eye deformations, cloning, microchipping etc and that the affiliations are loose at best.
privatepizza ago
I appreciate your opinion, said like this, I really do. Personally I'm on the fence about this, but * circumstantial evidence * says we have something to look at. In this case, why shut down others research on it? Really, every little thing (info) helps, and we'll find out in the end what's correct. But to shut down others discussing it, who have obviously put time into posting, isn't maybe the best approach, as it dis-encourages others to look at it.
If we don't care about the subject, no problem! I for one wouldn't downvoat someone who IS caring, and possibly revealing new info.
keyboard12 ago
Fair enough.
privatepizza ago
Cool, appreciate that.
privatepizza ago
To be citing Shill Tactics, you don't half display the appearance of one.
If it hasn't been proven, why disregard it?
The amount of shilling on this subject may tell us, don't you think, what's really going on with this case? IF unproven, why are you so vehement in dis-crying it?
If you don't have concrete reasons why it doesn't tie in, why be shilling it?
Far from 'loosely accociating things to try to connect them in our minds, we are joining the dots, if there are indeed any. Why put people off them when you have no concrete evidence to the contrary, other than disparaging genuine citizen investigators?
Yes well, I believe you but thousands wouldn't. With this shit you look like a paid shill-head. GTFO unless you've anything positive to say.
YingYangMom ago
Well said.
LostandFound ago
Haha nice! I didnt see your last response before pinging you. Best BTFO post I have seen in a while, see this burn /\ @V____Z
V____Z ago
One of those upvotes is mine ;)
privatepizza ago
; ) Cheers friend