Have you looked at the site? Most of the "articles" on there provide zero linked evidence for their claims and would not satisfy the submission requirements of this subverse. There is also no contact information for any reporters or editors, and their domain registry information is masked on WhoIs. It's all clickbait.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@http404;
I am flairing this "Accuracy in Question" due to new research: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1779596
People should not trust http://usapoliticsnow.com -- it is clearly unreliable and possibly deliberate disinfo.
@Millennial_Falcon, @wecanhelp, @abortionburger, @sensitive, @nnfx -- Please note future link posts to this site probably will not satisfy Rule 2.
http404 ago
Okay. Got that.
One question. Has there been previous instances which point that the site's info is unreliable?
Vindicator ago
Have you looked at the site? Most of the "articles" on there provide zero linked evidence for their claims and would not satisfy the submission requirements of this subverse. There is also no contact information for any reporters or editors, and their domain registry information is masked on WhoIs. It's all clickbait.