One should not declare the whole source as unreliable based on an unreliable article (or even many) published by that source. Every article should be handled as separate, regarding fact checking. Please don't use my earlier post as an excuse for your personal opinion about usapoliticsnow.
I do have a certain amount of suspicion towards them as a source, which makes me to look into their reliability more closely when I read an article by them, but not ALL they publish is bullshit.
Have you looked at the site? Most of the "articles" on there provide zero linked evidence for their claims and would not satisfy the submission requirements of this subverse. There is also no contact information for any reporters or editors, and their domain registry information is masked on WhoIs. It's all clickbait.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@http404;
I am flairing this "Accuracy in Question" due to new research: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1779596
People should not trust http://usapoliticsnow.com -- it is clearly unreliable and possibly deliberate disinfo.
@Millennial_Falcon, @wecanhelp, @abortionburger, @sensitive, @nnfx -- Please note future link posts to this site probably will not satisfy Rule 2.
anonOpenPress ago
One should not declare the whole source as unreliable based on an unreliable article (or even many) published by that source. Every article should be handled as separate, regarding fact checking. Please don't use my earlier post as an excuse for your personal opinion about usapoliticsnow.
I do have a certain amount of suspicion towards them as a source, which makes me to look into their reliability more closely when I read an article by them, but not ALL they publish is bullshit.
http404 ago
Okay. Got that.
One question. Has there been previous instances which point that the site's info is unreliable?
Vindicator ago
Have you looked at the site? Most of the "articles" on there provide zero linked evidence for their claims and would not satisfy the submission requirements of this subverse. There is also no contact information for any reporters or editors, and their domain registry information is masked on WhoIs. It's all clickbait.