Well, look at the Plaintiff and Defendant. Cernovich's name wasn't on there. Was he a party to this action? Did he put into have access to what Ghislaine Maxwell says if she's forced to testify? He would get a copy of affidavit if that were the case, and the testimony might be redacted because it's ongoing litigation. It's the same case number, I think. I glanced at it so I hope it saw what I think i saw. But even without finding it online, a look at the Plaintiff/Defendant does not show Epstein as the complainant or Cernovich as the defendant.
I really think he got rattled. There's been a lot going on and he might of forgotten requesting records. I'm more wondering if there was a final determination, and if not, what's going on. Cernovich's attorney would definitely be able to find that out.
It's an honest mistake. It shows what pressure these guys are under.
He is? I don't know. I've followed him for a long time and he's been a stand up guy. Maybe sleep deprivation? He and his wife just had that baby. I don't know what to say. It does seem like he'd at least at the Plaintiff and Defendant in the case. No, wait! It has to be an honest mistake because he's blasted this all over the internet! If it turns out that this has absolutely nothing to do with him (and it appears that it doesn't and that the papers are only copies of court proceedings), then he's going to have to say that. No one would put themselves in that position. It would be better to say you're sued, not show anything, but the envelope, and never be proven wrong.
I don't mean to sound harsh but this pisses me off. I've been on the fence about him for a while but the incidents like this keep piling up. Clicks. It's always the clicks and numbers to him.
I wanted to trust him early on because he seemed on the side of gg but too much has happened. His changing ideologies and denying he said or tweeted something when the archives and screenshots exist finally made me see that he's fundamentally dishonest.
view the rest of the comments →
quantokitty ago
Just saw this. It doesn't look like you're being sued. Not sure where you're getting that idea. Motion to Quash seems to be pertaining to the subpoena served to Ghislaine Maxwell. Here's the text online in pdf format. It appears to be the same case number: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2015cv07433/447706/503/0.pdf
Singleservename ago
So this pertains to Churcher not Cernovich? Now I'm confused.
quantokitty ago
Well, look at the Plaintiff and Defendant. Cernovich's name wasn't on there. Was he a party to this action? Did he put into have access to what Ghislaine Maxwell says if she's forced to testify? He would get a copy of affidavit if that were the case, and the testimony might be redacted because it's ongoing litigation. It's the same case number, I think. I glanced at it so I hope it saw what I think i saw. But even without finding it online, a look at the Plaintiff/Defendant does not show Epstein as the complainant or Cernovich as the defendant.
Singleservename ago
Case number matches you're spot on. No coincidence here.
Makes me wonder what this Cernovich is up to though.
quantokitty ago
I really think he got rattled. There's been a lot going on and he might of forgotten requesting records. I'm more wondering if there was a final determination, and if not, what's going on. Cernovich's attorney would definitely be able to find that out.
It's an honest mistake. It shows what pressure these guys are under.
Yates ago
Cernovich IS an attorney. I don't think this is an honest mistake.
quantokitty ago
He is? I don't know. I've followed him for a long time and he's been a stand up guy. Maybe sleep deprivation? He and his wife just had that baby. I don't know what to say. It does seem like he'd at least at the Plaintiff and Defendant in the case. No, wait! It has to be an honest mistake because he's blasted this all over the internet! If it turns out that this has absolutely nothing to do with him (and it appears that it doesn't and that the papers are only copies of court proceedings), then he's going to have to say that. No one would put themselves in that position. It would be better to say you're sued, not show anything, but the envelope, and never be proven wrong.
Yates ago
I don't mean to sound harsh but this pisses me off. I've been on the fence about him for a while but the incidents like this keep piling up. Clicks. It's always the clicks and numbers to him.
roundhouse1776 ago
Long before this, I've heard a lot of stuff that said not to trust Cernovich, that's he's controlled disinfo.
Yates ago
I wanted to trust him early on because he seemed on the side of gg but too much has happened. His changing ideologies and denying he said or tweeted something when the archives and screenshots exist finally made me see that he's fundamentally dishonest.