You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

justanotherpizza ago

I am one of those that criticised "coffeegate" when it was posted. I even used it as a good example of a shill post. What makes a post a good candidate it for a shill post? One of the goals is to 'muddy the waters'. Shills are very interested in introducing discourse that takes an investigation on a wild goose chase. If it can also use it to ridicule, then that is even better .

You have to consider that this is a day job for them . Which means that they can spend an extraordinary amount of time developing an "angle of attack".

Coffee gate was An extremely well researched post on an extremely flimsy premise. One that was easy to ridicule, and could be used against the pizzagate community.

The above post is once again ticking off all of my boxes. But I will give even further reason to ignore "coffee-based" logic ;) One of the defining aspects of pizza gate is that we see a pattern of pizza restaurants being involved in political events with ties to child abuse/paedophilia. The symbolic language that is found on Instagram and tumblr and Facebook and Twitter is littered with references to pizza , sex , children.

Coffee maybe a Euphemism for sex after a night out, but in terms of representing the kind of sick activity that we are talking about here, there is nothing noteworthy, except the desperateness of paid opposition to find cracks in pizza gate.

dogwalker ago

GTFO

justanotherpizza ago

I am a reasonable guy, and willing to change my mind given evidence opposite to my view. If you think I am wrong, what exactly makes you think that? I would maybe be able to agree that the poster isn't a shill, just an enthusiastic investigator. but then I would still say that the coffee angle is such a dead end. it doesn't have legs. do we have coffee houses implicated in pedophilia? any child molesting baristas to report? Dig into the orphanages, silsby, art galleries selling pedo themed art, there are SO MANY GOOD LEADS. do you see my point?

utez ago

What we have is a sex slave trafficking kinging paying Bill Clinton $90,000 for a cup of coffee. Do you see how maybe coffee isn't really coffee?

justanotherpizza ago

Hi Utez, thank you for engaging in discussion. so here are my thoughts:

So let me first say what I agree with:

I agree that 90k is corruption money. he is buying access to Clinton. the "Pay to Play" principle

I agree that all individuals mentioned probably have their fingers in various illegal activities. They might even be involved in sex trafficking, even child trafficking for all we know.

having said that, my take on the above is that it is "just" normal corruption. people want access to power. they pay to get it. it can be a 10k a plate fundraiser, a 90k cup of coffee, a 500k donation to the clinton foundation. but it is not systematic prostitution and trafficking of children.