Not only this but it is debatable if he even says John, it sounds more like "Darren" if you think he says Darren. It can be John but its quite unclear.
Also TheTuringTest you are linking to a wrong thread about the Dam, there is nothing in here about Podesta or Pizzagate
Alright not trying to be a shill, but you can be objective about it. Also there is ZERO evidence that in any of these videos the child calls him Skippy, not until i get a timestamp and filename of where it supposedly is.
Ask yourself who the disinfo shill really is here, the first thing you would do with such a claim is say its in "x" video at "2:21" timestamp, whole thread no one says anything like that!
Thats the hard part, i dont hear skippy in that lunacy. But this guy is going on about his multiple personalties. Its like they are all there in that bathroom.
Anunnaki_Bukakke 4 points (+4|-0) 2 hours ago
http://worldcorpo.net/ At 12 seconds the child says "John," which also admittedly sounds like it could also be "Darren." Then the child repeats it, and it is most certainly John to my ear at 14 seconds. If you alter your equalizer you can isolate the child's voice better.
If you alter your equalizer you can isolate the child's voice better.
Could you be more vague?
/snark
Srsly though, what alteration do you recommend? I don't hear any Skippy or John anywhere yet. Just Darren and a bunch of screaming which I can't make words out of.
The test here is going to be what a normie hears in a blind testing arrangement. Take this to someone who has no idea what it is and tell them nothing, and simply ask them to listen and tell what they hear. It's dumb for us moralfags to take our own impressions as objective facts (which, hopefully, we all realize), and it's simple to address the subjectivity factor.
view the rest of the comments →
ploppy ago
Where is the audio of him saying skippy? proof might be nice.
Pechal ago
Not only this but it is debatable if he even says John, it sounds more like "Darren" if you think he says Darren. It can be John but its quite unclear.
Also TheTuringTest you are linking to a wrong thread about the Dam, there is nothing in here about Podesta or Pizzagate
Touchdown50 ago
No it sounds like John.
Pechal ago
Alright not trying to be a shill, but you can be objective about it. Also there is ZERO evidence that in any of these videos the child calls him Skippy, not until i get a timestamp and filename of where it supposedly is.
Ask yourself who the disinfo shill really is here, the first thing you would do with such a claim is say its in "x" video at "2:21" timestamp, whole thread no one says anything like that!
Touchdown50 ago
Thats the hard part, i dont hear skippy in that lunacy. But this guy is going on about his multiple personalties. Its like they are all there in that bathroom.
Pechal ago
The multiple personalities thing is definitely more evidence, but all I'm saying is theres no evidence of this in this video.
Touchdown50 ago
If you listen to that second video you can hear him say" and me and me and me."
TheTuringTest ago
Anunnaki_Bukakke 4 points (+4|-0) 2 hours ago http://worldcorpo.net/ At 12 seconds the child says "John," which also admittedly sounds like it could also be "Darren." Then the child repeats it, and it is most certainly John to my ear at 14 seconds. If you alter your equalizer you can isolate the child's voice better.
Then in this video http://worldcorpo.net/content/video/each.mp4MP4
At ~7s the child says "No Skippy Skippy please" clear as a bell. Pechal is going to every comment and spreading FUD, makes me very suspicious of him.
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Could you be more vague?
/snark
Srsly though, what alteration do you recommend? I don't hear any Skippy or John anywhere yet. Just Darren and a bunch of screaming which I can't make words out of.
The test here is going to be what a normie hears in a blind testing arrangement. Take this to someone who has no idea what it is and tell them nothing, and simply ask them to listen and tell what they hear. It's dumb for us moralfags to take our own impressions as objective facts (which, hopefully, we all realize), and it's simple to address the subjectivity factor.
Yay for common sense.