You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Freemasonsrus ago

I think we have all missed looking at the fact that we only have a handful of volunteers but there were supposedly 450 children. Can you imagine how many adults it would take to deal with 450 kids 24/7?? Also, who was paying for the meals, clothes, healthcare ect? Second, the orphanage was 11mi from the epicenter and all of the children were unhurt, yet two adult volunteers died? Thats some seriously fucked up odds. One of your articles says the orphanage was unscathed. So how did they die? In other articles Silsby herself is quoted as saying the orphanage collapsed. If we assumed she was telling the truth, the odds that ALL 450 children would be A-OK is impossible. My point is, the conflicting information given makes the most sense when viewed through the lens of a coverup of both the deaths of the volunteers and the stealing of the children.

sugarskull ago

This is mere speculation but here in the US the average class size is 26 children to every teacher. In a place that may be volunteer challenged two adults might be the number used to be in charge of say...100 children. That would bring that number back to the 350 that were supposedly 'all safe' and may be an interesting lead to where the 100 went and perhaps why two adults died in that process. Could they have been collateral damage whilst the children were being taken?