With the Pegasus project and all that it entails, I believe we can now see quite clearly the MO of these fuckers.
What they need is
1) a place to display the merchandise (children)
2) a place to receive the buyers
3) a place where the adults can view the merchandise discretely
4) a place to pick up the merchandise (tbd, I still like the tunnels, other methods could raise suspicion)
5) A friendly neighborhood ANC
In the case of Pegasus they did just that: buy a front - the museum - to receive potential buyers. Take control of a place for display (Trolley Park, controlled by Alefantis acquaintance Dubeshter), take control of the neighborhood by buying other properties (Alefantis' Blue House fronting Pegasus, the suspicious white house next to it(?), Dubeshter and his partner John Henderson's extensive 11th street properties) and, finally, take control of neighborhood management by installing ANC's (Dubeshter).
And what they did at Pegasus is almost a mirror-image of what they did at Comet Ping Pong. Display the merchandise (ping pong rooms), have a place close to receive buyers (e.g. Buck's), control the neighborhood by owning, controlling or buying properties (Besta Pizza, Politics & Prose, the McCullough/Rockefeller place etc.) and control the ANC's (this is why they HAD to get rid of Frank Winstead by gaslighting and fear mongering).
This MO is by now so clearly established that I think we may try some deductive reasoning and see if they have deployed the same method before, and where.
view the rest of the comments →
AreWeSure ago
This is ridiculous. The Ping Pong Rooms are to "display the merchandise?" Why would you choose a spot that is completely open to the public. Why would you even need "the merchandise" on display?
Why not just have a small anonymous office somewhere where you show pictures of the merchandise? That takes care of 1, 2 and 3 above? And then the completely ridiculous #5 becomes irrelevant.
Why go through the trouble of running two active restaurants?
eyeVoated ago
Off the top of my head: 1) Cover. 2) Laundry money.
AreWeSure ago
Laundry money is a pretty great typo. You can get both those things with less ambitious restaurants.
And cover is pretty much gone if like the OP says, you are using the place to "display the merchandise." Too many visitors you have no control over. Too many people a child could say something too.
eyeVoated ago
Children do say things, and then their handlers calmly collect them and reprogram them by throwing them back in their cages.
(also, laundry money was a pun--e.g., landlords make extra cash by emptying their tenants' laundry machines--tax free)
(edit 2: ambitious? Have you ever been to a nice restaurant? those pedo restaurants are bare functional and exceedingly disgusting.)
AreWeSure ago
VieBleu ago
I can answer that one - surely you've seen the pics of the cages stacked at CPP? If not, too bad I don't have the link but they are archived. Yep, large metal cages, just like the ones pictured in sadistic ritual abuse paintings, right there on CPP property. Just like the kind that are used to transport animals like medium large monkeys. There were pictures of that too. Of course, I'm sure you can find a logical explanation why an "organic restauranteur" as you so elegantly put it would keep several rather large cages stacked two deep in precious kitchen space. Perfectly logical to you no doubt. Had to keep the tomatoes in those to keep them from escaping right?
AreWeSure ago
The "cages" I've seen at Comet Ping Pong were
A. Standard Metro rack shelving cages. These are common in the restaurant industry for storing high dollar items. B. Visible to the Public and in publicly accessible areas (Not Hidden) C. Filled with beer, wine and liquor.
Yes, this is all logical.
VieBleu ago
Those aren't the cages.
AreWeSure ago
Are you referring to specific cages? At Comet Ping Pong? Kids were kept on site there?
VieBleu ago
I looked one of the pics up - yes it could be explained by your explanation. In what I see it is holding cases of liquor it looks like.
Overall, and I was going to say this yesterday but we got caught up on something else, anyway I actually think your presence here is a very positive thing. I do wonder why in the world you would be interested in coming here, given your stance, as a hobby, so I have to conclude it is your job to do so. Fair enough. But actually being a voice of critical reason on the negative side is an important roll that every website of this kind needs and sometimes actually installs through a named character that always "trolls" to prevent groupthink. So you fulfill that role well whether intentionally or not and make people look at what they are saying, edit it and think more critically. Can't be a bad thing.
The regular people that are here are drawn here because they are concerned about hurt children. Thus the emotional factor is always going to be turned up a notch.
But you calling Alephantis an "organic restauranteur" is a bit rich. C'mon. you know he's a lot more than that.
eyeVoated ago
Dude, you're in the wrong subvoat