He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
He didn't just mention her in passing...it sounds like he doesn't know exactly what happened to her, but he keeps pushing for McCabe to not isolate Miami FBI office and to send loads of investigators to Haiti to find out what really happened to her. He seems to feel that McCabe (hope I'm getting the name right) is currently blocking FBI getting the truth.
I could be wrong, but I can't help but think that he and other players (current and former agents of various alphabet agencies) are waiting for Jan 20th to turn the ship. I don't think it will happen right that day, but the wheels will be set in motion. I don't believe Trump for a second when he says he isn't going to prosecute Hillary. That's what I would say too, take 'em off defense, let their guard down. He isn't going to personally prosecute shit...all he is saying is that he's going to have the backs of those that try to set things somewhat right. At least I hope so.
Tried downvoting you, but I couldn't. He doesn't really want to touch the pizzagate stuff because he doesn't want to be the next Monica Petersen. He's said it himself in previous videos. Crumbs are dropped because it's an unavoidable subject intertwined into what he's discussing. He's far braver and provided more knowledge into what's going on than you have. Nothing personal, but I don't think we should knock down people who are getting truth out for nothing in return.
There is nothing wrong in criticizing ineffective delivery of Pizzagate related information. The mediums of exposure are so limited, that each one of them should be utilized to maximum effect. Same goes for David Seaman. I get his role, I do, but I can't even watch him these days, it's all rants and paranoia.
Respect for your opinion here, just wanted to comment -- I've watched all of George Webb's videos, and if you watch them from the beginning (especially as they're coming out) they paint a coherent picture, and he cites his sources in the linked slide deck. It's true in this case he didn't say too much about Monica Petersen, but his role isn't to put all of the detailed evidence in his video, it's to connect the different aspects of the whole system and give the critical leads for people to follow, so that we can help him by finding new connections and giving him sources to cite. (He explains this in some of his videos.)
He was at first, but he thought it better as sort of a dead man switch to use his full name and where he lives, increasing odds that his death would draw suspicion. At least that is what was said.
I'm sure he doesn't need anyone defending him, but I'm gonna do it anyway. He's put an awful lot of information together, all (ASAIK) from public sources. The important output is the Google presentation, which has all the cites. The videos are just icing, highlighting shifts in direction and fertile areas to explore. Are the videos perfect? No, but they're still remarkable. I learn new things every time.
view the rest of the comments →
rutkdn ago
He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
smudgepotforever ago
He didn't just mention her in passing...it sounds like he doesn't know exactly what happened to her, but he keeps pushing for McCabe to not isolate Miami FBI office and to send loads of investigators to Haiti to find out what really happened to her. He seems to feel that McCabe (hope I'm getting the name right) is currently blocking FBI getting the truth.
I could be wrong, but I can't help but think that he and other players (current and former agents of various alphabet agencies) are waiting for Jan 20th to turn the ship. I don't think it will happen right that day, but the wheels will be set in motion. I don't believe Trump for a second when he says he isn't going to prosecute Hillary. That's what I would say too, take 'em off defense, let their guard down. He isn't going to personally prosecute shit...all he is saying is that he's going to have the backs of those that try to set things somewhat right. At least I hope so.
it_was_foretold ago
Tried downvoting you, but I couldn't. He doesn't really want to touch the pizzagate stuff because he doesn't want to be the next Monica Petersen. He's said it himself in previous videos. Crumbs are dropped because it's an unavoidable subject intertwined into what he's discussing. He's far braver and provided more knowledge into what's going on than you have. Nothing personal, but I don't think we should knock down people who are getting truth out for nothing in return.
rutkdn ago
There is nothing wrong in criticizing ineffective delivery of Pizzagate related information. The mediums of exposure are so limited, that each one of them should be utilized to maximum effect. Same goes for David Seaman. I get his role, I do, but I can't even watch him these days, it's all rants and paranoia.
throwawaa ago
Respect for your opinion here, just wanted to comment -- I've watched all of George Webb's videos, and if you watch them from the beginning (especially as they're coming out) they paint a coherent picture, and he cites his sources in the linked slide deck. It's true in this case he didn't say too much about Monica Petersen, but his role isn't to put all of the detailed evidence in his video, it's to connect the different aspects of the whole system and give the critical leads for people to follow, so that we can help him by finding new connections and giving him sources to cite. (He explains this in some of his videos.)
Peace
srayzie ago
I'm surprised he has said his full name and shown his face. If I were him, I would want to be anonymous
smudgepotforever ago
He was at first, but he thought it better as sort of a dead man switch to use his full name and where he lives, increasing odds that his death would draw suspicion. At least that is what was said.
srayzie ago
Well that kind of makes sense too
oldchangling ago
I'm sure he doesn't need anyone defending him, but I'm gonna do it anyway. He's put an awful lot of information together, all (ASAIK) from public sources. The important output is the Google presentation, which has all the cites. The videos are just icing, highlighting shifts in direction and fertile areas to explore. Are the videos perfect? No, but they're still remarkable. I learn new things every time.
Rigg5 ago
He's trying not to get all his videos taken down and killed. Crumbs here and there are good enough for right now.
TrishaUK ago
Excellent!! insight Great YouTuber George Webb. Where is Eric Braverman.