He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
Tried downvoting you, but I couldn't. He doesn't really want to touch the pizzagate stuff because he doesn't want to be the next Monica Petersen. He's said it himself in previous videos. Crumbs are dropped because it's an unavoidable subject intertwined into what he's discussing. He's far braver and provided more knowledge into what's going on than you have. Nothing personal, but I don't think we should knock down people who are getting truth out for nothing in return.
There is nothing wrong in criticizing ineffective delivery of Pizzagate related information. The mediums of exposure are so limited, that each one of them should be utilized to maximum effect. Same goes for David Seaman. I get his role, I do, but I can't even watch him these days, it's all rants and paranoia.
Respect for your opinion here, just wanted to comment -- I've watched all of George Webb's videos, and if you watch them from the beginning (especially as they're coming out) they paint a coherent picture, and he cites his sources in the linked slide deck. It's true in this case he didn't say too much about Monica Petersen, but his role isn't to put all of the detailed evidence in his video, it's to connect the different aspects of the whole system and give the critical leads for people to follow, so that we can help him by finding new connections and giving him sources to cite. (He explains this in some of his videos.)
view the rest of the comments →
rutkdn ago
He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
it_was_foretold ago
Tried downvoting you, but I couldn't. He doesn't really want to touch the pizzagate stuff because he doesn't want to be the next Monica Petersen. He's said it himself in previous videos. Crumbs are dropped because it's an unavoidable subject intertwined into what he's discussing. He's far braver and provided more knowledge into what's going on than you have. Nothing personal, but I don't think we should knock down people who are getting truth out for nothing in return.
rutkdn ago
There is nothing wrong in criticizing ineffective delivery of Pizzagate related information. The mediums of exposure are so limited, that each one of them should be utilized to maximum effect. Same goes for David Seaman. I get his role, I do, but I can't even watch him these days, it's all rants and paranoia.
throwawaa ago
Respect for your opinion here, just wanted to comment -- I've watched all of George Webb's videos, and if you watch them from the beginning (especially as they're coming out) they paint a coherent picture, and he cites his sources in the linked slide deck. It's true in this case he didn't say too much about Monica Petersen, but his role isn't to put all of the detailed evidence in his video, it's to connect the different aspects of the whole system and give the critical leads for people to follow, so that we can help him by finding new connections and giving him sources to cite. (He explains this in some of his videos.)
Peace