He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
I'm sure he doesn't need anyone defending him, but I'm gonna do it anyway. He's put an awful lot of information together, all (ASAIK) from public sources. The important output is the Google presentation, which has all the cites. The videos are just icing, highlighting shifts in direction and fertile areas to explore. Are the videos perfect? No, but they're still remarkable. I learn new things every time.
view the rest of the comments →
rutkdn ago
He really likes to hear himself talk but actually says very little of substance. He could have used this platform to go over the Monica Petersen case. Instead, he uses her name in the title and just kind of mentions her suspicious death in passing a couple of times, providing little value especially to newcomers.
oldchangling ago
I'm sure he doesn't need anyone defending him, but I'm gonna do it anyway. He's put an awful lot of information together, all (ASAIK) from public sources. The important output is the Google presentation, which has all the cites. The videos are just icing, highlighting shifts in direction and fertile areas to explore. Are the videos perfect? No, but they're still remarkable. I learn new things every time.