The code words in the infographic and the summary in the sidebar state the code as if it were fact. The summary says at one point: " "Cheese" is a known pedophile codeword for little girls, whereas "pasta" is a known codeword for little boys" . This is echoed as a refrain all across this board that the emails contain "known pedophile code words", but there is NO evidence of this. If there is evidence of it I am willing to believe it but have never seen it. I think that it's a serious problem that everyone on this board seems to believe it when they clearly have never seen the evidence.
Just look at the cognitive dissonance in this conversation between me (JUNOAK) and whitehand. He first claims, and I think truly believes, that you can find citations for the code words with a simple search. But after asking him to show me specifically where he finally gives me instructions that leads to the FBI pedophile symbols, but this is obviously not what I asked for.
After that exchange I created this post asking for citations for the words. It got only a couple of upvotes and one downvote for some reason. No one was able to provide citations and even someone repeated the claim that it was easy to find. IAMWHOIAM provided some links, but they must not have read them because none of them showed an explanation for the code words and even had evidence against it. From the voat thread about the man claiming to be a pedophile he says:
Pizza being used for a little girl i've never heard it used in that context. Nor have I ever heard hotdog used in that context
Either the infographic and the summary in the sidebar need to be changed to remove "the code", or more appropriate language needs to be used to talk about it, or everyone on here needs to stop complaining about being called fake news. I thought that the fake news accusation wasn't exactly deserved despite being a skeptic, but if this remains it is an outright lie.
People are being accused of the most heinous crimes based on it and people really believe it on here. It's irresponsible to a group that claims to be "investigators".
EDIT: Look at the cognitive dissonance in this thread and tell me that pizzagate doesn't have a serious problem.
view the rest of the comments →
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
I don't know mate, if the fact that the word pizza comes up related to sex in pedo conversations and culture thousands of times I don't know what to say to you. Alefantis is a close friend of Podesta, if he uses Pizza as a sexual reference, it stands to reason that when Podesta talks about pizza and is clearly not talking about actual pizza, there is a good chance that this is what he's talking about. I'm not saying its proveable, I'm just saying its idiotic to theorize it could be drugs etc. Im not recommending using it as evidence, that would be stupid. They don't 'involve pizza in some way' they have a slice of pizza on genitals. That is concrete symbolism, to deny it is beyond cognitive dissonance. have you looked at the photos? have you researched any of this?
Pizzainmyass ago
I think the dude was just trying to make the point that we can't use it as evidence and that this being some people's main argument is counter productive for us and would allow to someone to infer that our other conclusions include logical jumps of the sort.
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
Yea, I agree the argument points should be concrete, not hypotheses.