The code words in the infographic and the summary in the sidebar state the code as if it were fact. The summary says at one point: " "Cheese" is a known pedophile codeword for little girls, whereas "pasta" is a known codeword for little boys" . This is echoed as a refrain all across this board that the emails contain "known pedophile code words", but there is NO evidence of this. If there is evidence of it I am willing to believe it but have never seen it. I think that it's a serious problem that everyone on this board seems to believe it when they clearly have never seen the evidence.
Just look at the cognitive dissonance in this conversation between me (JUNOAK) and whitehand. He first claims, and I think truly believes, that you can find citations for the code words with a simple search. But after asking him to show me specifically where he finally gives me instructions that leads to the FBI pedophile symbols, but this is obviously not what I asked for.
After that exchange I created this post asking for citations for the words. It got only a couple of upvotes and one downvote for some reason. No one was able to provide citations and even someone repeated the claim that it was easy to find. IAMWHOIAM provided some links, but they must not have read them because none of them showed an explanation for the code words and even had evidence against it. From the voat thread about the man claiming to be a pedophile he says:
Pizza being used for a little girl i've never heard it used in that context. Nor have I ever heard hotdog used in that context
Either the infographic and the summary in the sidebar need to be changed to remove "the code", or more appropriate language needs to be used to talk about it, or everyone on here needs to stop complaining about being called fake news. I thought that the fake news accusation wasn't exactly deserved despite being a skeptic, but if this remains it is an outright lie.
People are being accused of the most heinous crimes based on it and people really believe it on here. It's irresponsible to a group that claims to be "investigators".
EDIT: Look at the cognitive dissonance in this thread and tell me that pizzagate doesn't have a serious problem.
view the rest of the comments →
notdivided ago
Also, just because someone you talked to didn't know their source doesn't mean there is no source or the info is bad. All kinds of logical fallacies in this OP
JUNOAK ago
I realize that but the fact that everyone on here seems to believe that these words are "known pedophile code words" is extremely irresponsible.
Look at the infographic and the summary and tell me that the code is being talked about as if it's just speculation. The infographic has the words with an equals sign to what they're supposed to mean but there is no evidence for any of those. Maybe leaving it at "appear to be code words" might be ok. But that list with the title "The Code" is ridiculous and irresponsible.
The summary is awful oto, just stating it outright that these are known code words.
I realize that there could be evidence for this code but that doesn't give anyone license to believe it and make accusations of pedophilia based on it.
notdivided ago
The fact is the words are pseudonyms that have been used by pedos on the internet for which we have evidence prepizzagate. That makes them known pedophile code words..
That being said if someone is saying the codewords as applied to the emails isn't speculation I tend to agree with you, we don't have any email that says "hey john we are using these codewords" etc..
UglyTruth ago
Facts are public not private. What seems to be the case for you is not necessarily how things actually are.