Trying to solidify the evidence of the large number of missing kids in Virginia talked about in these threads.
This 'evidence' was pulled from www.missingkids.com which does not provide downloadble statistics. Meaning that whoever created graphs like these:
had to manually search the website of www.missingkids.com and copy the numbers, which makes them questionable. Or they must be script-kiddies that copied the database. But I wasn't convinced, so started digging to search for (big) data and ran into a couple of interesting things:
the FBI's NCIC (National Crime Information Center) has published statistics about 'Missing Person and Unidentified Person Statistics' from 2007* to 2015 - *I didn't search for earlier numbers
These FBI reports do not split any data by state, or age, but hey it's the FBI. They certainly know. So could you ask them? I'm not a US citizen, I just would like to know.
I did not copy all data into a sheet to actually compare (too much work), so disclaimer: the following is a loose statement based on observation: *I was triggered by this https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1454609 suspected that the number of missing kids could increase leading up to Halloween..
Looking at the second table in the FBI links called NCIC Missing Persons (Monthly Totals), and comparing years. It seems that May & October - together with April & March always among highest number of cases.* This can be verified if anyone is interested.
As my search for 'by state' data of missing children continued a lot of sources where referring to NISMART and this is where it get's interesting.
According to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NISMART
" NISMART or the National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway and Throwaway Children, was a research project supported by the United States Department of Justice. It was enacted to address the 1984 Missing Children's Assistance Act (Pub.L. 98-473). This required the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to conduct periodic national incidence studies to determine the actual number of children reported missing and the number recovered. "
Finding data on NISMART-1 from 1988, seemed unrelevant. NISMART-2 which was initiated in 1999 and published in 2002 and can be accessed.
This research is mentioned in almost every research on child abuse I've found, even here on VOAT it's been used to debunk the "800.000 children go missing every year" statement https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/comments/1435600 however it's based on one 1997 sample group and is not actively monitored. * I didn't plowed through the datasets+inlog for their prediction on stats for Virginia.
So where is NISMART-3 ??? Good question! here is a timeline of evidence that seems to suggest that ..ehmm? yes what happened exactly?
And now in June of 2016 this got released
How did they publish only this almost 6 years after the start of the project? By looking at the Grant Application they had much much bigger goals back in 2010. https://www.ojjdp.gov/grants/solicitations/FY2010/NISMART3.pdf So are we still waiting, or is Wikipedia right that it was a research?
*I've lost a reference, will look it up. It was something about the ambition to make NISMART a triannual thing, by law..
HERE COME THE KIDS
Anyway after finding all of this, I wasn't one bit closer to the missing kids in Virginia, so I said ff it, I'll do it. Back to www.missingkids.com* who make some compelling trafficking infographics btw http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/desktop/CST-Full-1-5-2016.png
The website http://www.fugitivehunter.org/Statemissing.html made opening 52 tabs pretty easy. Copy+paste & voila!
guess we could have trusted the original posters of the information on the #extremly high rate of children missing in Virginia, this is shocking!
http://i.imgur.com/Pfkxu57.png
- Virginia has a 260% higher rating of missing children than the US average for missing childeren when accounted for population size
- Also note that Virginia bordering state West Virginia has the lowest rating?
- Compare this with the map of Huffington Post, looks like completly different picture!
open link below, and verify and copy this document please!
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Eouq0m_g-TLQ42qkTaG0yzs9PnQ1l_sdsaYBskh8h38/pubhtml
if someone could write a importxml, so we can auto scrub the links from missingkids.com, that would be nice
Guess the real question is: Is Virginia really this scary or are there tactics at play over at missingkids.com?
view the rest of the comments →
ThorTheWonderful ago
What I want to know is how many of the total are IVF babies and of IVF babies, what is the % of them that get kid napped and under what circumstances and what ages. Medical Organ trade is as big as pedo trade. DNA compatible donors could be big bucks for the extremely rich who need to live well over 100 so they can keep this shit going. Like Soros!!
As for Huffpo, they are a bunch of feminist pedophiles them selves so I am sure they will do anything to miss inform people.
DCmommaBear ago
Wow, that's a creepy thought!
ThorTheWonderful ago
That thought stems from the fact that people kept pointing out that the elites and some victims seemed to have the same genetic condition, the eyes iris. One of those victims was Maddy McCann. Her case seems to have all the ear marks of a pre-planned abduction. So the thought came to mind to ask the question, was she an IVF baby? I thought if only we could ask the parents. Well, it turns out they talked about the matter a long time ago and my question was answered. YES, she is an IVF baby!
Now what drives me to think about is knowing that this gene is rare and hereditary but most prevalent in multi generational inbreeding. In other words, if you breed incestuously for several generations, it is highly likely to develop this gene, once formed it becomes hereditary. And guess what, most people who have this gene are wealthy descendants of royalty and other elites. These elites are all related so closely, they are developing sever birth defects. I believe they are some form of supremacists who believe they must stay pure of race and pass their blood line by the mother only. This means female babies will be used in research, pedophilia and organ donors while male babies who are seeded through IVF will be used to impregnate pure elite females to produce off spring that most resemble their fathers blood line but with introduction of out side breeding to attempt to correct for the deformities of their genes.
This way the genetics are still in the elite family bloodline but removed by one external barer and reintroduced back into the family tree.
When I was a kid growing up on a ranch, I was the master at animal breeding. Not as simple as just sticking 2 animals together. And even though most animals are mature within a couple or three or four years, it can still be an extremely time consuming project to create the results you want. You can not simply breed two champion horses to produce a third champ. Or to create a stable champion breed.
DCmommaBear ago
Very interesting indeed!