No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
view the rest of the comments →
ThorTheWonderful ago
No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
Jehosefat ago
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
pontagon ago
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
standalone ago
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
LookingGlass ago
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
standalone ago
Unnecessarily assertive about unproven hypothesis. Don't question why no video interview. Jumps the gun and calls other people CTR shills.
You seem more like the CTR shill to me.
hanknut42 ago
we arent calling you an idhot for not agreeing its just take everything MSM does with a grain of Salt. In the end its up to you in what you beleive in