No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
+1. Also I realise he says 'ah' a lot in previous interviews but the latest audio interview its seems strange..almost like the exact same sound bite imo
Having lived my life, I don't trust anybody any more. Especially nobody in entertainment, news, education, politics, CIA, DHS, churches, etc etc.. I have more trust for old school mafia hitmen. These people make Al Capone look like a sweet heart.
I've met sociopaths, so many of them, I actually would trust the typical sociopath more. At least I can understand them as long as I know their motives.
Yeah I don't blame you. I should say I believe in some of my favorite journalists based on history. But I don't trust people. Especially after all of this
splices... they don't need that anymore. see voco by adobe. if they're gonna give that to civilians... those against assange have at least that already.
Prove it by making an Adobe Voco fake interview of Assange that explains with his voice that the interview is fake and explains how easy it is to fake his voice.
They have been grooming civilization for a lot longer than I've been alive, little by little they liberalize the masses and little by little the masses get closer to becoming ultra easy to conquer! Classic Bolshevik style pre-invasion.
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
I thought I heard a glitch when he said ok in between two sentences but then I felt like I heard that same thing while Sean was talking- almost like a record skipping. So maybe it was just the recording
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
Splices, aside, he didn't offer any new information. Just a repetition of the sources that he didn't understand as well as he should have, considering most people who have gone over the leaks could have answered a lot of those questions.
I'm not going to go right out and say it wasn't him, but I can conclusively say that we were given no new information and he said some information that is suspect, like the media was wrong in predicting Trump's odds. The media wasn't wrong, they lied. Even Vegas was way off their mark, and Vegas still took the biggest hit in political wagering in history.
My only counterpoint to that is he's been locked up and without Internet access, but albeit I can concur his last two interviews have been really disappointing information-wise.
The voice is obviously artificial, you only have to listen to his voice rather than listen to the words he is saying. Just pretend he is really boring and you can see for yourself it is 100 percent ficking fake.
view the rest of the comments →
ThorTheWonderful ago
No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
Eph513 ago
+1. Also I realise he says 'ah' a lot in previous interviews but the latest audio interview its seems strange..almost like the exact same sound bite imo
srayzie ago
I trust Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson
ThorTheWonderful ago
Having lived my life, I don't trust anybody any more. Especially nobody in entertainment, news, education, politics, CIA, DHS, churches, etc etc.. I have more trust for old school mafia hitmen. These people make Al Capone look like a sweet heart.
I've met sociopaths, so many of them, I actually would trust the typical sociopath more. At least I can understand them as long as I know their motives.
srayzie ago
Yeah I don't blame you. I should say I believe in some of my favorite journalists based on history. But I don't trust people. Especially after all of this
ThorTheWonderful ago
They are playing a think tank number, its like "good cop, bad cop" but with MSM, "good media, bad media".
They play people, "gas lighting", "grooming", never trust these types.
pontagon ago
this wasn't on fox though, just a fox anchor - just clarifying.
ThorTheWonderful ago
Doesn't matter, he still represents FOX.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
splices... they don't need that anymore. see voco by adobe. if they're gonna give that to civilians... those against assange have at least that already.
standalone ago
Prove it by making an Adobe Voco fake interview of Assange that explains with his voice that the interview is fake and explains how easy it is to fake his voice.
ThorTheWonderful ago
I've done editing 35 years ago and you couldn't tell. With digital media it should be a piece a piss.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
yeah voco see that shit.
fucking silly for anyone to believe this shit.
anything wiki puts out now
i consider part of the greatest disinfo campaign in the history of mankind.
ahem cough hash cough keys cough
ThorTheWonderful ago
They have been grooming civilization for a lot longer than I've been alive, little by little they liberalize the masses and little by little the masses get closer to becoming ultra easy to conquer! Classic Bolshevik style pre-invasion.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
we've long been conquered.
ThorTheWonderful ago
Don't kid your self, it gets worse than this!
Jehosefat ago
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
Godwillwin ago
I thought I heard a glitch when he said ok in between two sentences but then I felt like I heard that same thing while Sean was talking- almost like a record skipping. So maybe it was just the recording
ThorTheWonderful ago
When I download it and give it a listen, I will. I am still listening to all his old interviews, some are hours long.
EDIT: I'll even try to un-filter some of the back ground noises in their splices. Audio manipulation is easy but there is usually traces left!
pontagon ago
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
standalone ago
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
LookingGlass ago
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
standalone ago
Unnecessarily assertive about unproven hypothesis. Don't question why no video interview. Jumps the gun and calls other people CTR shills.
You seem more like the CTR shill to me.
hanknut42 ago
we arent calling you an idhot for not agreeing its just take everything MSM does with a grain of Salt. In the end its up to you in what you beleive in
webofslime ago
Splices, aside, he didn't offer any new information. Just a repetition of the sources that he didn't understand as well as he should have, considering most people who have gone over the leaks could have answered a lot of those questions.
I'm not going to go right out and say it wasn't him, but I can conclusively say that we were given no new information and he said some information that is suspect, like the media was wrong in predicting Trump's odds. The media wasn't wrong, they lied. Even Vegas was way off their mark, and Vegas still took the biggest hit in political wagering in history.
RebelSkum ago
My only counterpoint to that is he's been locked up and without Internet access, but albeit I can concur his last two interviews have been really disappointing information-wise.
kiiiiiiTttty ago
The voice is obviously artificial, you only have to listen to his voice rather than listen to the words he is saying. Just pretend he is really boring and you can see for yourself it is 100 percent ficking fake.
common_sense ago
Not really the case.
What, specifically, makes you think that? I'm torn tbh, but saying it's "obviously" fake is just nonsense.
dafacts ago
It is not obviously fake.. what a stupid assumption to make. If it is fake, it's a bloody good one.
Cantilever ago
Of course it's a good one. Knowing that millions of ears would scrutinize it, why would they submit anything less than the very best?