No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
I thought I heard a glitch when he said ok in between two sentences but then I felt like I heard that same thing while Sean was talking- almost like a record skipping. So maybe it was just the recording
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
Splices, aside, he didn't offer any new information. Just a repetition of the sources that he didn't understand as well as he should have, considering most people who have gone over the leaks could have answered a lot of those questions.
I'm not going to go right out and say it wasn't him, but I can conclusively say that we were given no new information and he said some information that is suspect, like the media was wrong in predicting Trump's odds. The media wasn't wrong, they lied. Even Vegas was way off their mark, and Vegas still took the biggest hit in political wagering in history.
My only counterpoint to that is he's been locked up and without Internet access, but albeit I can concur his last two interviews have been really disappointing information-wise.
The voice is obviously artificial, you only have to listen to his voice rather than listen to the words he is saying. Just pretend he is really boring and you can see for yourself it is 100 percent ficking fake.
view the rest of the comments →
ThorTheWonderful ago
No kidding.. As soon as I heard about I had to dive into his recorded interviews so I can recognize the splices when they play them into the fake interview.
Everybody thinks that FOX is trustworthy, not so, their majority share holder is a Saudi prince!
Jehosefat ago
Ok, then please post the splices side by side with the originals. If you don't do this, then all you have is speculation. I listened to the interview live and did not detect any audio glitches or mismatches at all. If you make a claim like this then you have to back it up.
Godwillwin ago
I thought I heard a glitch when he said ok in between two sentences but then I felt like I heard that same thing while Sean was talking- almost like a record skipping. So maybe it was just the recording
ThorTheWonderful ago
When I download it and give it a listen, I will. I am still listening to all his old interviews, some are hours long.
EDIT: I'll even try to un-filter some of the back ground noises in their splices. Audio manipulation is easy but there is usually traces left!
pontagon ago
The hesitations/stumbling seemed pretty natural to me actually, and I'd imagine they are the types of things it would be tricky to fake, but its somewhat pointless arguing about it, theres no real proof either way, we just have to see how it unfolds.
I also find it strange/curious to why so many people are also pushing "IT IS 100% FAKE YOURE AN IDOT IF YOU DONT AGREE" is actually the idiotic stance here, please just wait until we have something solid to make such absolute claims. And it seems to be echoing hard around this part of the internet.
standalone ago
Nobody is saying it's 100% fake. What people are saying is that it's not a valid proof that Assange is alive and so this piece of pseudo-evidence is 100% useless.
LookingGlass ago
Nothing about the interview seemed suspicious to me.
People are pushing the "fake" thing and "Julian is dead" to discredit Wikileaks publications as fake too. It's an obvious CTR troll effort, this Pizzagate scandal is making them desperate, and it seems we have a few of these CTR cockroaches here on VOAT too....
standalone ago
Unnecessarily assertive about unproven hypothesis. Don't question why no video interview. Jumps the gun and calls other people CTR shills.
You seem more like the CTR shill to me.
hanknut42 ago
we arent calling you an idhot for not agreeing its just take everything MSM does with a grain of Salt. In the end its up to you in what you beleive in
webofslime ago
Splices, aside, he didn't offer any new information. Just a repetition of the sources that he didn't understand as well as he should have, considering most people who have gone over the leaks could have answered a lot of those questions.
I'm not going to go right out and say it wasn't him, but I can conclusively say that we were given no new information and he said some information that is suspect, like the media was wrong in predicting Trump's odds. The media wasn't wrong, they lied. Even Vegas was way off their mark, and Vegas still took the biggest hit in political wagering in history.
RebelSkum ago
My only counterpoint to that is he's been locked up and without Internet access, but albeit I can concur his last two interviews have been really disappointing information-wise.
kiiiiiiTttty ago
The voice is obviously artificial, you only have to listen to his voice rather than listen to the words he is saying. Just pretend he is really boring and you can see for yourself it is 100 percent ficking fake.
common_sense ago
Not really the case.
What, specifically, makes you think that? I'm torn tbh, but saying it's "obviously" fake is just nonsense.
dafacts ago
It is not obviously fake.. what a stupid assumption to make. If it is fake, it's a bloody good one.
Cantilever ago
Of course it's a good one. Knowing that millions of ears would scrutinize it, why would they submit anything less than the very best?